Heigener David, Küchler Thomas
Department of Thoracic Oncology, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf GmbH, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Wöhrendamm 80, 22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Reference Center on Quality of Life in Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Prüner Gang 15, Haus 1,24103 Kiel, Germany.
Lung Cancer Manag. 2016 Jun;5(2):105-116. doi: 10.2217/lmt-2016-0010. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Quality of life (QoL) is important to cancer patients and is increasingly included as a trial end point. The methodologies/findings of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of second-line treatments approved for use in the EU in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, without known targetable mutations, were evaluated. Seven trials were identified; five compared active treatments and two compared active treatment to placebo. Methodologies used and reporting varied. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer lung cancer questionnaire was the most commonly used assessment method (n = 4). There was no evidence to suggest differences in QoL between active treatments. Consistent and appropriate use of standard QoL instruments in future would increase the reliability of results and their applicability to clinical decision-making.
生活质量(QoL)对癌症患者很重要,并且越来越多地被纳入试验终点。对评估欧盟批准用于晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)且无已知可靶向突变患者的二线治疗的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验的方法/结果进行了评估。共识别出7项试验;5项比较了活性治疗,2项将活性治疗与安慰剂进行了比较。所使用的方法和报告各不相同。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织肺癌问卷是最常用的评估方法(n = 4)。没有证据表明活性治疗之间在生活质量上存在差异。未来一致且适当地使用标准生活质量工具将提高结果的可靠性及其在临床决策中的适用性。