Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Anesthesiology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Int Orthop. 2019 Sep;43(9):2191-2198. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4262-7. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
To study the clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics and summarize the experience of treatment of abdominal vascular injury related to lumbar surgery.
We analyzed patients who suffered abdominal vascular injury during lumbar surgery in our hospital retrospectively and reviewed related literature in the PUBMED database from 2002 to 2017. Combined with the existing treatment options and outcomes, we investigated further and summarized our findings.
With the data from our hospital, four cases of injuries were included, i.e., left common iliac artery and vein (CIA and CIV), left internal iliac artery, and inferior vena cava. Almost all of the patients (one exception) manifesting unstable haemodynamics were primarily treated by traditional vessel suture. After treatment, two patients died eventually, while the others recovered well at follow-up. With the reported data, 77 patients with the most frequently type of laceration (58.4%) were included. For vascular laceration, unstable haemodynamics was diagnosed in most of the patients (88.9%); CIA and CIV accounted for the all the most common patients (78.7%). Extracted from these data, traditional surgical method was selected to repair laceration prevalently (86.7%), while arteriovenous fistula and pseudoaneurysm were treated with an interventional procedure. Negative outcomes included two deaths, two suffered lower limb deep vein thrombosis, and two suffered graft infection.
Different treatment choices should be conducted depending on different injury characteristics and patients' condition. Moreover, early recognition and prompt treatment are critical components to successful rescue. When a vascular injury is suspected, ultrasonography and positive abdominal exploration are recommended together with unified leadership in the rescue team.
研究与腰椎手术相关的腹部血管损伤的临床和病理生理特征,并总结其治疗经验。
我们回顾性分析了我院在腰椎手术中发生腹部血管损伤的患者,并检索了 2002 年至 2017 年 PUBMED 数据库中的相关文献。结合现有的治疗方案和结果,我们进行了进一步的调查和总结。
根据我院的数据,纳入了 4 例损伤,即左髂总动脉和静脉(CIA 和 CIV)、左髂内动脉和下腔静脉。几乎所有表现为血流动力学不稳定的患者(1 例外)均首先采用传统的血管缝合治疗。治疗后,2 例患者最终死亡,其余患者在随访中恢复良好。根据报告的数据,纳入了 77 例最常见的裂伤类型(58.4%)的患者。对于血管裂伤,大多数患者(88.9%)被诊断为血流动力学不稳定;CIA 和 CIV 占所有最常见患者(78.7%)。从这些数据中提取出,传统的手术方法被选择来修复裂伤(86.7%),而动静脉瘘和假性动脉瘤则采用介入治疗。不良结局包括 2 例死亡,2 例下肢深静脉血栓形成,2 例移植物感染。
应根据不同的损伤特征和患者情况选择不同的治疗方案。此外,早期识别和及时治疗是成功抢救的关键因素。当怀疑发生血管损伤时,建议联合超声检查和阳性腹部探查,并在抢救团队中实施统一的领导。