• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠外营养医嘱书写和审核美国肠外肠内营养学会规范实施对能力、态度和认知的影响。

Impact of Implementation of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Model for Parenteral Nutrition Order Writing and Review on Competency, Attitudes, and Perceptions.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Administrative Science, Howard University College of Pharmacy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Coordinated Program in Dietetics, La Salle University School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;34(4):597-605. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10237. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1002/ncp.10237
PMID:30644606
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) parenteral nutrition (PN) safety consensus recommendations advise a comprehensive education program and competency assessment for all healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients receiving PN. The ASPEN-model papers provide guidance for designing PN competencies for prescribers, pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive educational program that aligns with the ASPEN model on PN competency, attitudes, and perceptions in a multidisciplinary healthcare professional audience.

METHODS

Dietitians, pharmacists, and physicians attended a 3-hour ASPEN model-based educational program focused on PN order writing and review. Matched preeducation and posteducation competency assessments were completed by attendees. Attitudes and perceptions were also assessed before and after the educational program using 5-point Likert scales.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven subjects were included in the analysis. The majority of attendees were dietitians (53.6%), followed by pharmacists (45.4%). Overall, multidisciplinary competency assessment scores improved by an average of 12.6% (preassessment average of 62.7%, postassessment average of 75.3%, P < 0.0001). Nine out of 10 statements regarding PN attitudes and perceptions significantly improved on the 5-point Likert scales (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive PN educational program in alignment with the ASPEN model positively impacted multidisciplinary healthcare professional PN competency, attitudes, and perceptions. To optimize patient safety, local organizations and institutions should implement formalized training as outlined by the ASPEN model for healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients receiving PN.

摘要

背景

美国肠外肠内营养学会(ASPEN)肠外营养(PN)安全共识建议为所有参与 PN 治疗患者护理的医疗保健专业人员提供全面的教育计划和能力评估。ASPEN 模式论文为制定 PN 能力提供了指导,包括处方者、药剂师和药剂技术员。本研究旨在评估与 ASPEN 模式一致的综合教育计划对多学科医疗保健专业人员 PN 能力、态度和看法的影响。

方法

营养师、药剂师和医生参加了 3 小时的 ASPEN 模式为基础的教育计划,重点是 PN 医嘱的书写和审查。与会者完成了匹配的教育前和教育后能力评估。使用 5 分制李克特量表,在教育计划前后还评估了态度和看法。

结果

97 名受试者被纳入分析。与会者主要是营养师(53.6%),其次是药剂师(45.4%)。总体而言,多学科能力评估分数平均提高了 12.6%(教育前平均 62.7%,教育后平均 75.3%,P <0.0001)。关于 PN 态度和看法的 10 个陈述中有 9 个在 5 分制李克特量表上显著改善(P <0.05)。

结论

与 ASPEN 模式一致的全面 PN 教育计划对多学科医疗保健专业人员的 PN 能力、态度和看法产生了积极影响。为了优化患者安全,地方组织和机构应按照 ASPEN 模式为参与 PN 治疗患者护理的医疗保健专业人员实施规范化培训。

相似文献

1
Impact of Implementation of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Model for Parenteral Nutrition Order Writing and Review on Competency, Attitudes, and Perceptions.肠外营养医嘱书写和审核美国肠外肠内营养学会规范实施对能力、态度和认知的影响。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;34(4):597-605. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10237. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
2
Standardized Competencies for Parenteral Nutrition Order Review and Parenteral Nutrition Preparation, Including Compounding: The ASPEN Model.肠外营养医嘱审核及肠外营养配制(包括混合调配)的标准化能力:美国肠外肠内营养学会模型
Nutr Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;31(4):548-55. doi: 10.1177/0884533616653833. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
3
Enteral and Parenteral Order Writing Survey-A Collaborative Evaluation Between the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Dietitians in Nutrition Support Dietetics Practice Group and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Dietetics Practice Section.肠内和肠外医嘱书写调查-营养支持营养师实践组与美国肠外和肠内营养学会(ASPEN)营养师实践分会之间的合作评估。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Oct;120(10):1745-1753. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
Enteral and Parenteral Order Writing Survey-A Collaborative Evaluation Between the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Dietitians in Nutrition Support Dietetics Practice Group and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Dietetics Practice Section.肠内和肠外医嘱书写调查-营养支持营养师实践组的美国营养与饮食学会(Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics)和肠外与肠内营养学会(American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition,ASPEN)营养实践分会之间的合作评估。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;35(3):377-385. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10467. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Standardized Competencies for Parenteral Nutrition Prescribing: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Model.肠外营养处方的标准化能力:美国肠外和肠内营养学会模型
Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Aug;30(4):570-6. doi: 10.1177/0884533615591167. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
6
Parenteral nutrition safe practices: results of the 2003 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition survey.肠外营养安全操作规范:2003年美国肠外和肠内营养学会调查结果
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 May-Jun;30(3):259-65. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030003259.
7
Standardized Competencies for Parenteral Nutrition Administration: The ASPEN Model.肠外营养管理的标准化能力:ASPEN 模式。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;33(2):295-304. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10055. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?肠外营养何时适用?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Mar;41(3):324-377. doi: 10.1177/0148607117695251. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Improving the safety and effectiveness of parenteral nutrition: results of a quality improvement collaboration.改善肠外营养的安全性和有效性:质量改进合作的结果。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;25(6):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0884533610385349.
10
Role of pharmacists in providing parenteral nutrition support: current insights and future directions.药剂师在提供肠外营养支持中的作用:当前见解与未来方向。
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018 Oct 2;7:125-140. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S117118. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition and Personalized Nutritional Approach After Colorectal Resection Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.结直肠切除术后的外周肠外营养与个性化营养方法:当前证据的全面综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 14;61(8):1459. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081459.
2
The Role of a Simulation-Based Activity on Student Perceptions of Parenteral Nutrition Education.基于模拟的活动在学生对肠外营养教育认知方面的作用
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Jul 21;8(3):123. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8030123.