World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6875.
High costs and risks of research and development (R&D) have been used to justify the high prices of cancer drugs. However, what the return on R&D investment is, and by extension what a justifiable price might be, is unclear.
To compare incomes from the sales of cancer drugs with the estimated R&D costs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study used global pharmaceutical industry sales data to quantify the cumulative incomes generated from the sales of cancer drugs for companies that have held patents or marketing rights (originator companies). All cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 1989 to 2017 were identified from the United States Food and Drug Administration's website and literature. Itemized product sales data were extracted from the originator companies' consolidated financial reports. For drugs with data missing in specific years, additional data was sought from other public sources, or where necessary, estimated values from known reported values. Drugs were excluded if there were missing data for half or more of the years since approval. Data analysis was conducted from May 2018 to October 2018.
Sales data were expressed in 2017 US dollars with adjustments for inflation. Cumulative incomes from the sales of these drugs were compared against the R&D costs estimated in the literature, which had been adjusted for the costs of capital and trial failure (risk adjusted).
Of the 156 US Food and Drug Administration-approved cancer drugs identified, 99 drugs (63.5%) had data for more than half of the years since approval and were included in the analysis. There was a median of 10 years (range, 1-28 years) of sales data with 1040 data points, 79 (7.6%) of which were estimated. Compared with the total risk-adjusted R&D cost of $794 million (range, $2827-$219 million) per medicine estimated in the literature, by the end of 2017, the median cumulative sales income was $14.50 (range, $3.30-$55.10) per dollar invested for R&D. Median time to fully recover the maximum possible risk-adjusted cost of R&D ($2827 million) was 5 years (range, 2-10 years; n = 56). Cancer drugs continued to generate billion-dollar returns for the originator companies after the end-of-market exclusivity, particularly for biologics.
Cancer drugs, through high prices, have generated returns for the originator companies far in excess of possible R&D costs. Lowering prices of cancer drugs and facilitating greater competition are essential for improving patient access, health system's financial sustainability, and future innovation.
高昂的研发(R&D)成本和风险被用来证明癌症药物的高价是合理的。然而,R&D 投资的回报是多少,以及由此延伸的合理价格可能是多少,目前尚不清楚。
比较癌症药物销售收入与估计的研发成本。
设计、地点和参与者:本观察性研究使用全球制药行业的销售数据,从专利或营销权(原研公司)拥有者的角度,量化了自 1989 年至 2017 年期间,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的癌症药物销售所产生的累计收入。从美国 FDA 网站和文献中确定了所有在美国 FDA 批准的癌症药物。从原研公司的合并财务报告中提取了产品销售的明细数据。对于特定年份数据缺失的药物,如果缺失数据超过一半,则从其他公开来源寻找额外数据,或者在必要时根据已知报告值进行估计值。如果有一半或一半以上年份的数据缺失,则将药物排除在外。数据分析于 2018 年 5 月至 2018 年 10 月进行。
销售数据以 2017 年美元表示,并进行了通胀调整。将这些药物的销售累计收入与文献中估计的研发成本进行比较,这些成本已经考虑了资本成本和试验失败的风险(风险调整后)。
在所确定的 156 种美国 FDA 批准的癌症药物中,有 99 种(63.5%)药物的批准后销售数据超过一半,被纳入分析。销售数据中位数为 10 年(范围,1-28 年),共 1040 个数据点,其中 79 个(7.6%)为估计值。与文献中估计的每一种药物 7.94 亿美元(范围,2.827 亿至 2.19 亿美元)的总风险调整后研发成本相比,截至 2017 年底,研发每投资 1 美元的累积销售收入中位数为 14.50 美元(范围,3.30-55.10 美元)。完全收回最大可能风险调整后研发成本(2.827 亿美元)的中位时间为 5 年(范围,2-10 年;n=56)。在市场独占期结束后,癌症药物继续为原研公司带来数十亿美元的回报,特别是生物制剂。
通过高价,癌症药物为原研公司带来的回报远远超过了可能的研发成本。降低癌症药物价格并促进更大的竞争,对于改善患者获得药物的机会、医疗体系的财务可持续性以及未来的创新至关重要。