Wouters Olivier J, Vogel Matthew, Feldman William B, Beall Reed F, Kesselheim Aaron S, Tu S Sean
Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
JAMA. 2024 Dec 24;332(24):2101-2108. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.16911.
Biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) receive 12 years of guaranteed protection from biosimilar competition compared with 5 years of protection from generic competition for new small-molecule drugs. Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, biologics are exempt from selection for Medicare price negotiation for 11 years compared with 7 years for small-molecule drugs. Congress codified these differing legal protections on the premise that biologics require more time and resources to develop and have weaker patent protection, necessitating additional protections for manufacturers to recoup their development costs and generate adequate returns on investment.
To review empirical evidence from the US experience with biologics to analyze the assumptions underlying longer periods of market exclusivity and protection from price negotiation compared with small-molecule drugs.
Recent data on development times, clinical trial success rates, research and development costs, patent protection, market exclusivity periods, revenues, and treatment costs of biologics vs small-molecule drugs were analyzed.
The FDA approved 599 new therapeutic agents from 2009-2023, of which 159 (27%) were biologics and 440 (73%) were small-molecule drugs. Median development times were 12.6 years (IQR, 10.6-15.3 years) for biologics vs 12.7 years (IQR, 10.2-15.5 years) for small-molecule drugs (P = .76). Biologics had higher clinical trial success rates at every phase of development. Median development costs were estimated to be $3.0 billion (IQR, $1.3 billion-$5.5 billion) for biologics and $2.1 billion (IQR, $1.3 billion-$3.7 billion) for small-molecule drugs (P = .39). Biologics were protected by a median of 14 patents (IQR, 5-24 patents) compared with 3 patents (IQR, 2-5 patents) for small-molecule drugs (P < .001). The median time to biosimilar competition was 20.3 years (IQR, 16.9-21.7 years) compared with 12.6 years (IQR, 12.5-13.5 years) for small-molecule drugs. Biologics achieved higher median peak revenues ($1.1 billion in year 13; IQR, $0.5 billion-$2.9 billion) than small-molecule drugs ($0.5 billion in year 8; IQR, $0.1 billion-$1.2 billion; P = .01) and had higher median revenues in each year following FDA approval. The median annual cost of treatment was $92 000 (IQR, $31 000-$357 000) for biologics and $33 000 (IQR, $4000-$177 000) for small-molecule drugs (P = .005).
There is little evidence to support biologics having longer periods of market exclusivity or protection from negotiation. As a result of differential treatment, US law appears to overly reward the development of biologics relative to small-molecule drugs.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的生物制剂可获得12年免受生物类似药竞争的保障,而新型小分子药物的专利保护期为5年。根据2022年《降低通胀法案》,生物制剂在11年内可免于医疗保险价格谈判,而小分子药物为7年。国会编纂这些不同的法律保护措施的前提是,生物制剂的研发需要更多时间和资源,且专利保护较弱,因此需要为制造商提供额外保护,以收回其研发成本并获得足够的投资回报。
回顾美国生物制剂经验的实证证据,以分析与小分子药物相比,更长的市场独占期和免受价格谈判保护背后的假设。
分析了生物制剂与小分子药物在研发时间、临床试验成功率、研发成本、专利保护、市场独占期、收入和治疗成本方面的最新数据。
2009年至2023年,FDA批准了599种新型治疗药物,其中159种(27%)是生物制剂,440种(73%)是小分子药物。生物制剂的中位研发时间为12.6年(四分位间距,10.6 - 15.3年),小分子药物为12.7年(四分位间距,10.2 - 15.5年)(P = 0.76)。生物制剂在研发的每个阶段都有更高的临床试验成功率。生物制剂的中位研发成本估计为30亿美元(四分位间距,13亿美元 - 55亿美元),小分子药物为21亿美元(四分位间距,13亿美元 - 37亿美元)(P = 0.39)。生物制剂受到的专利保护中位数量为14项(四分位间距,5 - 24项),而小分子药物为3项(四分位间距,2 - 5项)(P < 0.001)。生物类似药竞争的中位时间为20.3年(四分位间距,16.9 - 21.7年),小分子药物为12.6年(四分位间距,12.5 - 13.5年)。生物制剂实现的中位峰值收入(第13年为11亿美元;四分位间距,5亿美元 - 29亿美元)高于小分子药物(第8年为5亿美元;四分位间距,1亿美元 - 12亿美元;P = 0.01),且在FDA批准后的每年中位收入都更高。生物制剂的中位年治疗成本为92000美元(四分位间距,31000美元 - 357000美元),小分子药物为33000美元(四分位间距,4000美元 - 177000美元)(P = 0.005)。
几乎没有证据支持生物制剂拥有更长的市场独占期或免受谈判保护。由于区别对待,美国法律似乎相对于小分子药物过度奖励了生物制剂的研发。