• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后 1 年内主要心血管事件的相关危险因素。

Risk Factors Associated With Major Cardiovascular Events 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181079. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1079.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1079
PMID:30646102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6324290/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients who survive acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a high risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events. Efforts to identify risk factors for recurrence have primarily focused on the period immediately following AMI admission.

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors and develop and evaluate a risk model that predicts 1-year cardiovascular events after AMI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study. Patients with AMI (n = 4227), aged 18 years or older, discharged alive from 53 acute-care hospitals across China from January 1, 2013, to July 17, 2014. Patients were randomly divided into samples: training (50% [2113 patients]), test (25% [1057 patients]), and validation (25% [1057 patients]). Risk factors were identified by a Cox model with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and further evaluated by latent class analysis. Analyses were conducted from May 1, 2017, to January 21, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Major cardiovascular events, including recurrent AMI, stroke, heart failure, and death, within 1 year after discharge for the index AMI hospitalization.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 60.8 (11.8) years and 994 of 4227 patients (23.5%) were female. Common comorbidities included hypertension (2358 patients [55.8%]), coronary heart disease (1798 patients [42.5%]), and dyslipidemia (1290 patients [30.5%]). One-year event rates were 8.1% (95% CI, 6.91%-9.24%), 9.0% (95% CI, 7.22%-10.70%), and 6.4% (95% CI, 4.89%-7.85%) for the training, test, and validation samples, respectively. Nineteen risk factors comprising 15 unique variables (age, education, prior AMI, prior ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, hypertension, angina, prearrival medical assistance, >4 hours from onset of symptoms to admission, ejection fraction, renal dysfunction, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, white blood cell count, blood glucose, and in-hospital complications) were identified. In the training, test, and validation samples, respectively, the risk model had C statistics of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75-0.83), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.78), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.70-0.83) and a predictive range of 1.2% to 33.9%, 1.2% to 37.9%, and 1.3% to 34.3%. The C statistic was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) for the latent class model in the training data. The risk model stratified 11.3%, 81.0%, and 7.7% of patients to high-, average-, and low-risk groups, with respective probabilities of 0.32, 0.06, and 0.01 for 1-year events.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Nineteen risk factors were identified, and a model was developed and evaluated to predict risk of 1-year cardiovascular events after AMI. This may aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients who would benefit most from intensive follow-up and aggressive risk factor reduction.

摘要

重要性

急性心肌梗死(AMI)存活的患者有很高的发生后续重大心血管事件的风险。努力识别复发的风险因素主要集中在 AMI 入院后立即发生的时期。

目的

确定风险因素,并开发和评估预测 AMI 后 1 年心血管事件的风险模型。

设计、地点和参与者:前瞻性队列研究。患者为 AMI(n=4227),年龄 18 岁或以上,从 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 7 月 17 日从中国 53 家急性护理医院出院存活。患者被随机分为样本:训练(50%[2113 例])、测试(25%[1057 例])和验证(25%[1057 例])。通过带有马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模拟的 Cox 模型确定风险因素,并通过潜在类别分析进一步评估。分析于 2017 年 5 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 21 日进行。

主要结局和测量

出院后索引 AMI 住院期间 1 年内发生的主要心血管事件,包括复发性 AMI、中风、心力衰竭和死亡。

结果

队列的平均(标准差)年龄为 60.8(11.8)岁,4227 例患者中有 994 例(23.5%)为女性。常见合并症包括高血压(2358 例[55.8%])、冠心病(1798 例[42.5%])和血脂异常(1290 例[30.5%])。训练、测试和验证样本的 1 年事件发生率分别为 8.1%(95%CI,6.91%-9.24%)、9.0%(95%CI,7.22%-10.70%)和 6.4%(95%CI,4.89%-7.85%)。确定了 19 个风险因素,包括 15 个独特变量(年龄、教育程度、既往 AMI、既往室性心动过速或颤动、高血压、心绞痛、到达前医疗援助、症状发作至入院时间>4 小时、射血分数、肾功能障碍、心率、收缩压、白细胞计数、血糖和院内并发症)。在训练、测试和验证样本中,风险模型的 C 统计分别为 0.79(95%CI,0.75-0.83)、0.73(95%CI,0.68-0.78)和 0.77(95%CI,0.70-0.83),预测范围为 1.2%至 33.9%、1.2%至 37.9%和 1.3%至 34.3%。训练数据中潜在类别模型的 C 统计为 0.69(95%CI,0.65-0.74)。风险模型将 11.3%、81.0%和 7.7%的患者分为高、中、低风险组,相应的 1 年事件概率分别为 0.32、0.06 和 0.01。

结论和相关性

确定了 19 个风险因素,并开发和评估了预测 AMI 后 1 年心血管事件风险的模型。这可能有助于临床医生识别高风险患者,这些患者最需要强化随访和积极降低风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/a0041e359dc6/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/ec16be4556e5/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/466f24677fca/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/a0041e359dc6/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/ec16be4556e5/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/466f24677fca/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/6324290/a0041e359dc6/jamanetwopen-1-e181079-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors Associated With Major Cardiovascular Events 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后 1 年内主要心血管事件的相关危险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181079. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1079.
2
[Identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction that may be discharged early: prospective evaluation with simple clinical and instrumental indicators].[急性心肌梗死患者早期出院可能性的识别:采用简单临床和仪器指标的前瞻性评估]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2001 Jul;2(7):775-82.
3
Development and validation of dynamic models to predict postdischarge mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.开发和验证用于预测急性心肌梗死患者出院后死亡风险的动态模型:来自中国急性心肌梗死注册研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 29;13(3):e069505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069505.
4
High thrombotic risk increases adverse clinical events up to 5 years after acute myocardial infarction. A nationwide retrospective cohort study.高血栓形成风险会增加急性心肌梗死后长达5年的不良临床事件。一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2019 Nov 21;89(3). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2019.1166.
5
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Associated With In-Hospital Acute Myocardial Infarction.与院内急性心肌梗死相关的发病率、危险因素和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7348.
6
Development and validation of Women Acute Myocardial Infarction in-Hospital Mortality Score (WAMI Score).女性急性心肌梗死院内死亡率评分(WAMI 评分)的制定与验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;259:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.010.
7
Association Between Medication Adherence and 1-Year Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events After Acute Myocardial Infarction in China.中国急性心肌梗死后药物治疗依从性与 1 年主要心血管不良事件的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011793. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011793.
8
Association Between Subsequent Hospitalizations and Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction Within 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后 1 年内再次住院与复发性急性心肌梗死的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 17;9(6):e014907. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014907. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
9
Hemodialysis immediately after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后立即进行血液透析。
Nephron. 1996;74(1):104-9. doi: 10.1159/000189287.
10
The early diastolic myocardial velocity: a marker of increased risk in patients with coronary heart disease.舒张早期心肌速度:冠心病患者风险增加的一个标志物。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Sep;34(5):389-96. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12110. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical diagnostic and prognostic value of homocysteine combined with hemoglobin [f (Hcy-Hb)] in cardio-renal syndrome caused by primary acute myocardial infarction.同型半胱氨酸联合血红蛋白[f(Hcy-Hb)]在原发性急性心肌梗死所致心肾综合征中的临床诊断及预后价值
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 23;23(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06512-4.
2
Development of a multidimensional prediction model for long-term prognostic risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective observational cohort study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者长期预后风险的多维预测模型的开发:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0318445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318445. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Heart failure after myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Mechanisms, incidence and identification of patients at risk.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代心肌梗死后的心衰:机制、发生率及高危患者的识别
World J Cardiol. 2017 May 26;9(5):407-415. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.407.
2
Depression Treatment and 1-Year Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRIUMPH Registry (Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status).急性心肌梗死后的抑郁症治疗与1年死亡率:来自TRIUMPH注册研究(急性心肌梗死患者健康状况潜在差异的转化研究)的见解
Circulation. 2017 May 2;135(18):1681-1689. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025140. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Does a Raised Serum Troponin During a Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Predict Future Cardiovascular Events?
严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期血清肌钙蛋白升高是否预示未来心血管事件?
Cureus. 2025 Feb 19;17(2):e79288. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79288. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Assessment of the prognostic performance of TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC and GRACE scores for short-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing emergent percutaneous revascularisation: a prospective observational study.评估TIMI、PAMI、CADILLAC和GRACE评分对接受急诊经皮血管重建术患者短期主要不良心血管事件的预后预测性能:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 12;15(3):e091028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091028.
5
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病急性肾损伤风险预测模型的开发与验证
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 10;25(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04466-x.
6
Plasma infrared fingerprinting with machine learning enables single-measurement multi-phenotype health screening.结合机器学习的血浆红外指纹图谱技术可实现单次测量的多表型健康筛查。
Cell Rep Med. 2024 Jul 16;5(7):101625. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101625. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Therapeutic education of patients with coronary heart disease: Impact of digital platform monitoring in preventing major cardiovascular events in Tunisia: Study protocol.冠心病患者的治疗教育:数字平台监测对预防突尼斯主要心血管事件的影响:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300250. eCollection 2024.
8
Genomic risk prediction of cardiovascular diseases among type 2 diabetes patients in the UK Biobank.英国生物银行中2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病的基因组风险预测
Front Bioinform. 2024 Jan 4;3:1320748. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1320748. eCollection 2023.
9
Impact of myocardial deformation on risk prediction in patients following acute myocardial infarction.心肌形变对急性心肌梗死后患者风险预测的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 10;10:1199936. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199936. eCollection 2023.
10
Plasma metabolic fingerprints for large-scale screening and personalized risk stratification of metabolic syndrome.血浆代谢指纹图谱用于代谢综合征的大规模筛查和个体化风险分层。
Cell Rep Med. 2023 Jul 18;4(7):101109. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101109.
Accelerometry-Assessed Latent Class Patterns of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Mortality.加速度计评估的身体活动和久坐行为潜在类别模式与死亡率的关系
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2):135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.033.
4
Applying Latent Class Analysis to Risk Stratification for Perioperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Intraabdominal General Surgery.将潜在类别分析应用于腹部普通外科手术患者围手术期死亡风险分层
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):193-205. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001279.
5
Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗1年后双联抗血小板治疗获益与风险预测规则的制定与验证
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1735-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3775.
6
Four Distinct Health Profiles in Older Patients With Cancer: Latent Class Analysis of the Prospective ELCAPA Cohort.老年癌症患者的四种不同健康状况:前瞻性ELCAPA队列的潜在类别分析
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Dec;71(12):1653-1660. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw052. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
7
China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Prospective Study of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Study Design.中国以患者为中心的心脏事件评估急性心肌梗死前瞻性研究:研究设计
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 5;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.172596.
8
Sleeping difficulty, disease and mortality in older women: a latent class analysis and distal survival analysis.老年女性的睡眠困难、疾病与死亡率:潜在类别分析和远端生存分析
J Sleep Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):648-57. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12324. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698.
10
National trends in stroke after acute myocardial infarction among Medicare patients in the United States: 1999 to 2010.1999年至2010年美国医疗保险患者急性心肌梗死后中风的全国趋势
Am Heart J. 2015 Jan;169(1):78-85.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 14.