Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186054. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6054.
Despite progress in narrowing gender-based salary gaps, notable disparities persist in the scientific community. The significance of pay difference may be underestimated, with little data evaluating its effect on lifetime wealth after accounting for factors like time to promotion and savings.
To characterize gender disparities in salary and assess the outcomes associated with a gender equity initiative (GEI).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Quality improvement study with simulations of salary and additional accumulated wealth (AAW) using retrospectively reviewed Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine annual salary and promotion data. All academic faculty were included in the faculty salary analysis from 2005 (n = 1481) and 2016 (n = 1885).
Salary and longitudinal promotion data from 2005 to 2016 were used to estimate gender-based differences in salary and time to promotion. The effect of these differences on total salary and AAW, including retirement and salary-based investments, was simulated for a representative male and female faculty member over a 30-year career in 3 scenarios: (1) pre-GEI, (2) post-GEI, and (3) in real time for GEI, beginning with and progressing through these initiatives.
Analyses of salaries of 1481 faculty (432 women) in 2005 and 1885 faculty (742 women) in 2016 revealed that a decade after GEI implementation, the overall mean (SE) salary gap by gender decreased from -2.6% (1.2%) (95% CI, -5.6% to -0.3%) to -1.9% (1.1%) (95% CI, -4.1% to 0.3%). Simulation of pre-GEI disparities correlated with male faculty collecting an average lifetime AAW of $501 416 more than the equivalent woman, with disparities persisting past retirement. The AAW gap decreased to $210 829 in the real-time GEI simulation and to $66 104 using post-GEI conditions, reflecting success of GEI efforts.
Even small gender-based salary gaps are associated with substantial differences in lifetime wealth, but an institutional commitment to achieving equitable promotion and compensation for women can appreciably reduce these disparities. The findings of this study support broad implementation of similar initiatives without delay, as results may take more than a decade to emerge. A modifiable version of the simulation is provided so that external users may assess the potential disparities present within their own institutions.
尽管在缩小基于性别的薪资差距方面取得了进展,但科学界仍存在显著的差距。薪酬差异的意义可能被低估了,几乎没有数据评估其在考虑晋升时间和储蓄等因素后对终身财富的影响。
描述薪酬方面的性别差距,并评估性别平等倡议(GEI)带来的结果。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项质量改进研究,使用约翰霍普金斯大学医学院回溯审查的年度薪资和晋升数据进行薪资模拟和额外累计财富(AAW)分析。从 2005 年(n=1481)和 2016 年(n=1885)的所有学术教员中纳入教员薪资分析。
使用 2005 年至 2016 年的薪资和纵向晋升数据来估计薪资方面的性别差异和晋升时间。为了模拟这些差异对代表男女教员在 30 年职业生涯中的总薪资和 AAW 的影响,包括退休和基于薪资的投资,在 3 种情况下对男性和女性教员进行了模拟:(1)GEI 前,(2)GEI 后,(3)GEI 实时,从这些倡议开始并持续进行。
对 2005 年的 1481 名教员(432 名女性)和 2016 年的 1885 名教员(742 名女性)的薪资进行分析发现,在实施 GEI 十年后,整体性别薪资差距从 -2.6%(1.2%)(95%CI,-5.6%至-0.3%)缩小到-1.9%(1.1%)(95%CI,-4.1%至 0.3%)。对 GEI 前差异的模拟与男性教员在其整个职业生涯中平均比同等女性多获得 501416 美元的累计财富有关,且这种差异一直持续到退休后。在实时 GEI 模拟中,AAW 差距缩小到 210829 美元,而在使用 GEI 后条件下,差距缩小到 66104 美元,这反映了 GEI 努力的成功。
即使是很小的基于性别的薪资差距也与终身财富的巨大差异有关,但机构承诺为女性实现公平的晋升和薪酬待遇可以显著减少这些差距。本研究的结果支持广泛实施类似倡议而不拖延,因为结果可能需要十多年的时间才能显现。提供了一个可修改的模拟版本,以便外部用户可以评估其所在机构存在的潜在差距。