Oukes Tamara, Blauw Helga, van Bon Arianne C, DeVries J Hans, von Raesfeld Ariane M
1 Center for Entrepreneurship, Strategy and Innovation Management (ESIM-NIKOS), Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Endocrinology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Sep;13(5):899-909. doi: 10.1177/1932296818823728. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
Psychosocial factors that may affect acceptance of artificial pancreas (AP) systems have been investigated in small sample sizes of highly motivated, self-selected persons with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) with a focus on product characteristics. We aimed to develop a valid survey to investigate the association of technology readiness and social influence with AP acceptance in a larger sample, including both self-selected and invited respondents with T1DM.
An online survey was developed based on established questionnaires. Intention to use the AP was chosen as measure of AP acceptance. T1DM patients who signed up themselves for scientific research into AP systems represented the self-selected group, while patients treated at a teaching hospital represented the invited group. Questionnaire values were compared using independent -tests and regression analyses.
The developed survey showed reliability and validity. The survey was completed by 425 self-selected and 109 invited persons. Intention to use the AP was high in both groups, but was significantly higher among self-selected respondents. In both groups, intention to use the AP was most strongly related to product compatibility, followed by product complexity, technology readiness, and product usefulness among invited respondents; and followed by product usefulness and technology innovativeness among self-selected respondents.
Product characteristics have a stronger relationship with AP acceptance than technology readiness, while social influence does not seem to be associated with AP acceptance. As the (strength of) factors differ between self-selected and invited persons, researchers and product developers should be cautious when relying on self-selected persons with T1DM in the design, development, and testing of AP systems.
在小样本、积极性高且为自我选择的1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者中,已对可能影响人工胰腺(AP)系统接受度的心理社会因素进行了研究,重点关注产品特性。我们旨在开发一项有效的调查,以在更大样本中研究技术准备情况和社会影响与AP接受度之间的关联,样本包括自我选择和受邀参与的T1DM患者。
基于已有的问卷开发了一项在线调查。将使用AP的意向作为AP接受度的衡量指标。自行报名参与AP系统科研的T1DM患者代表自我选择组,而在教学医院接受治疗的患者代表受邀组。使用独立样本t检验和回归分析对问卷数据进行比较。
所开发的调查显示出可靠性和有效性。425名自我选择的患者和109名受邀患者完成了调查。两组使用AP的意向都很高,但自我选择的受访者中该意向显著更高。在两组中,使用AP的意向与产品兼容性的相关性最强,在受邀受访者中其次是产品复杂性、技术准备情况和产品有用性;在自我选择的受访者中其次是产品有用性和技术创新性。
产品特性与AP接受度的关系比技术准备情况更强,而社会影响似乎与AP接受度无关。由于自我选择和受邀人员的(影响)因素强度不同,研究人员和产品开发者在AP系统的设计、开发和测试中依赖自我选择的T1DM患者时应谨慎。