• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坑式厕所填满率:内罗毕-肯尼亚非正规住区的变化决定因素及其对公共卫生的影响。

Pit latrine fill-up rates: variation determinants and public health implications in informal settlements, Nakuru-Kenya.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Resource and Environmental Science, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya.

Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6403-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-6403-3
PMID:30646871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6334433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pit latrine operational management and sludge accumulation rate, presents a challenging sanitation problem in low-income urban settlements. However, these challenges have been under-researched. This study was carried out between December 2014 and September 2015 in Nakuru, Kenya. Its objectives were to determine pit latrine management activities and content accumulation rates.

METHODS

A longitudinal design was used to study 100 households and their respective pit latrines. Sludge accumulation in 73 pit latrines was monitored for 10 months using a digital laser range-finder. Data analysis included normality testing and descriptive statistics. Differences in fill up across and within the study areas were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and the Fisher's Exact Test used to determine areas with significant differences.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of the pit latrines were used as solid waste disposal points while 45% of the respondents had no hygiene awareness. The annual fill-up rate and individual sludge contribution were 0.87 ± 0.20 m and 41.82 l respectively. The sludge accumulation rates across the study areas had statistically significant mean differences (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Operational management and design affect the fill-up rates and post fill-up management operations. This study argues for a need to link information and awareness to users, construction artisans, property owners and local authorities on appropriate vault volumes and management practices. Linking the variables would ensure efficient sanitation service delivery and public health protection.

摘要

背景

在低收入城市住区,粪坑的运营管理和淤渣积累率是一个具有挑战性的环境卫生问题。然而,这些挑战还没有得到充分研究。本研究于 2014 年 12 月至 2015 年 9 月在肯尼亚纳库鲁进行,目的是确定粪坑管理活动和淤渣积累率。

方法

采用纵向设计,研究了 100 户家庭及其各自的粪坑。使用数字激光测距仪监测 73 个粪坑中的淤渣积累情况,持续 10 个月。数据分析包括正态性检验和描述性统计。使用单向方差分析和 Fisher 精确检验分析研究区域之间和内部的填满差异,以确定具有显著差异的区域。

结果

61%的粪坑被用作固体废物处置点,而 45%的受访者没有卫生意识。年填满率和个体淤渣贡献分别为 0.87±0.20 m 和 41.82 l。研究区域的淤渣积累率存在统计学上的显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论

运营管理和设计会影响填满率和填满后的管理操作。本研究认为,需要向用户、建筑工匠、业主和地方当局提供有关适当拱顶体积和管理实践的信息和意识。将这些变量联系起来可以确保高效的环境卫生服务提供和公共卫生保护。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/a49e1ef86168/12889_2019_6403_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/b594957cf654/12889_2019_6403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/487f97636bde/12889_2019_6403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/bafad6a580e7/12889_2019_6403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/95eb07ff31ab/12889_2019_6403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/a49e1ef86168/12889_2019_6403_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/b594957cf654/12889_2019_6403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/487f97636bde/12889_2019_6403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/bafad6a580e7/12889_2019_6403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/95eb07ff31ab/12889_2019_6403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/595d/6334433/a49e1ef86168/12889_2019_6403_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pit latrine fill-up rates: variation determinants and public health implications in informal settlements, Nakuru-Kenya.坑式厕所填满率:内罗毕-肯尼亚非正规住区的变化决定因素及其对公共卫生的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6403-3.
2
Fecal Sludge Management in Low Income Settlements: Case Study of Nakuru, Kenya.低收入住区的粪便污泥管理:肯尼亚纳库鲁案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;9:750309. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750309. eCollection 2021.
3
Adopt or Adapt: Sanitation Technology Choices in Urbanizing Malawi.采用还是适应:城市化进程中的马拉维卫生技术选择
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161262. eCollection 2016.
4
Is there a difference in prevalence of helminths between households using ecological sanitation and those using traditional pit latrines? A latrine based cross sectional comparative study in Malawi.使用生态卫生设施的家庭与使用传统坑式厕所的家庭之间,蠕虫的流行率是否存在差异?在马拉维进行的一项基于厕所的横断面比较研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jun 9;10(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2519-7.
5
Pit Latrine Fecal Sludge Resistance Using a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Low Income Areas in Mzuzu City, Malawi.马拉维姆祖祖市低收入地区使用动态圆锥贯入仪评估坑式厕所粪便污泥的阻力
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 3;14(2):87. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020087.
6
Problems associated with the use of pit latrines in Blantyre, Republic of Malawi.马拉维共和国布兰太尔使用坑式厕所所带来的问题。
J R Soc Promot Health. 2000 Sep;120(3):175-82. doi: 10.1177/146642400012000307.
7
Sanitation and hygiene in urban and rural households in East Africa.东非城乡家庭中的环境卫生与个人卫生
Int J Environ Health Res. 2003 Jun;13(2):107-15. doi: 10.1080/0960312031000098035.
8
Pit latrine emptying behavior and demand for sanitation services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的坑式厕所清空行为及卫生服务需求
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Feb 27;12(3):2588-611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302588.
9
Advantages and limitations for users of double pit pour-flush latrines: a qualitative study in rural Bangladesh.双坑式冲水厕所使用者的优点和局限性:孟加拉国农村地区的一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4412-7.
10
Community Faecal Management Strategies and Perceptions on Sludge Use in Agriculture.社区粪便管理策略以及对农业污泥利用的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114128.

引用本文的文献

1
Water source, latrine type, and rainfall are associated with detection of non-optimal and enteric bacteria in the vaginal microbiome: a prospective observational cohort study nested within a cluster randomized controlled trial.水源、厕所类型和降雨量与阴道微生物群中检测到的非最佳细菌和肠道细菌有关:一项嵌套在整群随机对照试验中的前瞻性观察队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1419. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10313-3.
2
The Status of Sanitation in Malawi: Is SDG6.2 Achievable?马拉维的环境卫生状况:SDG6.2 目标能否实现?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 5;20(15):6528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156528.
3
Fecal Sludge Management in Low Income Settlements: Case Study of Nakuru, Kenya.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of quality of shared sanitation facilities in informal settlements: case study of Kisumu, Kenya.非正规住区共享卫生设施质量的决定因素:肯尼亚基苏木的案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-4009-6.
2
The Knowledge Base for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal Targets on Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene.实现水供应、环境卫生和个人卫生可持续发展目标指标的知识库。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 27;13(6):536. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060536.
3
Shared sanitation: to include or to exclude?
低收入住区的粪便污泥管理:肯尼亚纳库鲁案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;9:750309. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750309. eCollection 2021.
4
Conceptual Behaviour Underpinning the Occurrence of Nonfaecal Matter in Faecal Sludge in Some Urban Communities, Ghana.加纳部分城市社区粪便污泥中出现非粪便物质的概念行为基础。
J Environ Public Health. 2021 May 10;2021:2672491. doi: 10.1155/2021/2672491. eCollection 2021.
5
COVID-19 pandemic: Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) as a critical control measure remains a major challenge in low-income countries.COVID-19 大流行:水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)作为一项关键控制措施,在低收入国家仍然是一项重大挑战。
Water Res. 2021 Mar 1;191:116793. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116793. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
6
Latrine Ownership and Its Determinants in Rural Villages of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.提格雷北部农村地区厕所拥有情况及其决定因素:基于社区的横断面研究。
J Environ Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;2020:2123652. doi: 10.1155/2020/2123652. eCollection 2020.
共享卫生设施:纳入还是排除?
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016 May;110(5):265-7. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trw029.
4
Seasonal variations and shared latrine cleaning practices in the slums of Kampala city, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市贫民窟的季节变化与共用厕所清洁做法
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3036-7.
5
Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances.撒哈拉以南非洲城市地区的坑式厕所运行情况如何?对使用、填满情况、昆虫及气味滋扰的综述。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 4;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2772-z.
6
The sanitation environment in urban slums: implications for child health.城市贫民窟的卫生环境:对儿童健康的影响。
Popul Environ. 2008 Nov 1;30(1-2):26-47. doi: 10.1007/s11111-008-0074-9.
7
Pit latrine emptying behavior and demand for sanitation services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的坑式厕所清空行为及卫生服务需求
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Feb 27;12(3):2588-611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302588.
8
Assessing the impact of a school-based latrine cleaning and handwashing program on pupil absence in Nyanza Province, Kenya: a cluster-randomized trial.评估肯尼亚尼扬扎省一项以学校为基础的厕所清洁和洗手计划对学生缺勤率的影响:一项整群随机试验。
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Oct;19(10):1185-97. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12360. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
9
Descending the sanitation ladder in urban Uganda: evidence from Kampala Slums.乌干达城市地区卫生水平下降:来自坎帕拉贫民窟的证据
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 19;14:624. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-624.
10
Improving service delivery of water, sanitation, and hygiene in primary schools: a cluster-randomized trial in western Kenya.改善肯尼亚西部小学供水、环境卫生和个人卫生服务:一项集群随机试验。
J Water Health. 2013 Sep;11(3):507-19. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.213.