Matias Margret, Wusik Katie, Neilson Derek, Zhang Xue, Valencia C Alexander, Collins Kathleen
Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Genet Couns. 2019 Apr;28(2):182-193. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1054. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
Whole exome sequencing (WES) is expected to impact patient management, but data surrounding the types of downstream effects and how frequently these effects are observed depending on the type of WES results received is limited. This study investigated changes to medical management and genetic counseling (GC) options following WES for individuals with positive and negative results. Electronic medical records of patients who had positive (n = 37) or negative (n = 41) WES results from Cincinnati Children's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and post-WES management and GC options were analyzed as were differences between positive and negative results. Almost all participants (97%) were observed to have at least one difference in medical management and/or GC options following WES. Comparing pre- and post-WES detected significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in genetic testing, imaging, and metabolic testing regardless of WES results. Participants with positive results also had significant differences in recurrence risk, reproductive options, testing for family members, and support groups. Pre- to post-WES differences were significantly different between participants with positive and negative results in specialist referrals, lifestyle recommendations, recurrence risk, and all GC options (p ≤ 0.05); specifically, participants with positive results were more likely to have differences in these categories. Overall, differences in medical management and/or GC options were observed for participants with both types of WES results (positive and negative). Results from this study may contribute to the understanding of how WES impacts patients and their care and thus improve its utilization.
全外显子组测序(WES)有望影响患者管理,但关于下游效应类型以及根据所获得的WES结果类型观察到这些效应的频率的数据有限。本研究调查了WES结果为阳性和阴性的个体在WES后医疗管理和遗传咨询(GC)选择的变化。回顾性分析了辛辛那提儿童医院WES结果为阳性(n = 37)或阴性(n = 41)的患者的电子病历。分析了WES前后的管理和GC选择以及阳性和阴性结果之间的差异。几乎所有参与者(97%)在WES后在医疗管理和/或GC选择上至少有一项差异。无论WES结果如何,比较WES前后发现基因检测、影像学检查和代谢检查存在显著差异(p≤0.05)。结果为阳性的参与者在复发风险、生殖选择、家庭成员检测和支持小组方面也存在显著差异。WES前后的差异在专科转诊、生活方式建议、复发风险和所有GC选择方面,阳性和阴性结果的参与者之间存在显著差异(p≤0.05);具体而言,结果为阳性的参与者在这些类别中更有可能存在差异。总体而言,两种WES结果(阳性和阴性)的参与者在医疗管理和/或GC选择上均存在差异。本研究结果可能有助于理解WES如何影响患者及其护理,从而提高其利用率。