Toward a Common Agenda for the Public and Private Sectors to Advance Digital Health Communication.
作者信息
Abroms Lorien C, Allegrante John P, Auld M Elaine, Gold Robert S, Riley William T, Smyser Joseph
机构信息
Lorien C. Abroms is with the Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. John P. Allegrante is with the Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. M. Elaine Auld is with the Society for Public Health Education, Washington, DC. Robert S. Gold is with the Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. William T. Riley is with the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Joseph Smyser is with The Public Good Projects, New York, NY.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(2):221-223. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304806.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Toward a Common Agenda for the Public and Private Sectors to Advance Digital Health Communication.迈向公共和私营部门推进数字健康通信的共同议程。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(2):221-223. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304806.
2
Differences in public and private sector adoption of telemedicine: Indian case study for sectoral adoption.公共部门和私营部门在远程医疗采用方面的差异：印度部门采用情况的案例研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:257-68.
3
The great technological divide.巨大的技术鸿沟。
BMJ. 2004 Apr 3;328(7443):788. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7443.788.
4
Digital Health Communication Common Agenda 2.0: An Updated Consensus for the Public and Private Sectors to Advance Public Health.数字健康传播共同议程 2.0：公共和私营部门为推进公共卫生而更新的共识。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Dec;46(2_suppl):124-128. doi: 10.1177/1090198119874086.
5
District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a case study of the potential of public and private sector data in India and Ethiopia.低收入环境下的地区卫生决策：以印度和埃塞俄比亚公共和私营部门数据的潜力为例
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii25-ii34. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw017.
6
Health care of female outpatients in south-central India: comparing public and private sector provision.印度中南部女性门诊患者的医疗保健：公立与私立部门服务比较
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Nov;19(6):402-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh055.
7
The roles of the public and private sectors in health care.
J Health Adm Educ. 1999 Fall;17(4):323-31.
8
Private and public sectors should face same rules.私营部门和公共部门应遵循相同的规则。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1090.
9
Health disparities between diabetic patients under private and public health coverage in Puerto Rico, 2000.2000年波多黎各享有私人医疗保险和公共医疗保险的糖尿病患者之间的健康差异。
P R Health Sci J. 2003 Dec;22(4):363-8.
10
Barriers of mistrust: public and private health sectors' perceptions of each other in Madhya Pradesh, India.不信任的障碍：印度中央邦公共和私营卫生部门对彼此的看法
Qual Health Res. 2008 Jun;18(6):756-66. doi: 10.1177/1049732308318504.
引用本文的文献
1
Social media as a public health tool during the UK mpox outbreak: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences.英国猴痘疫情期间社交媒体作为公共卫生工具的定性研究：利益相关者经历分析
BMJ Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;1(1):e000407. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000407. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Mental Health Stigma Reduction in the Midwestern United States: Evidence from a Digital Campaign Using a Collective Impact Model.美国中西部地区减少心理健康污名化：基于采用集体影响模式的数字运动的证据。
J Community Health. 2022 Dec;47(6):924-931. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01130-3. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Depression, HIV, and COVID-19: A Deadly Trifecta.抑郁症、艾滋病病毒与2019冠状病毒病：致命三重奏。
Public Health Rep. 2022 May-Jun;137(3):420-424. doi: 10.1177/00333549221074389. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
4
"It depends:" a qualitative study on digital health academic-industry collaboration.“视情况而定”：一项关于数字健康领域产学研合作的定性研究
Mhealth. 2021 Oct 20;7:57. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-20-140. eCollection 2021.
5
Preventing COVID-19 and Its Sequela: "There Is No Magic Bullet... It's Just Behaviors".预防新冠病毒及其后遗症：“没有万灵药……关键在于行为” 。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):288-292. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data.通过移动健康用于健康和行为追踪的模式对美国人群进行特征描述：对美国国家癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查数据的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 14;22(5):e16299. doi: 10.2196/16299.
7
Advancing evidence-based digital health through an innovative research environment: an academic-industry collaboration case report.通过创新研究环境推进基于证据的数字健康：一份产学研合作案例报告。
Mhealth. 2019 Sep 20;5:37. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.08. eCollection 2019.
本文引用的文献
1
On the Promise and Peril of Technology for Population Health: A Public Health of Consequence, November 2017.《技术对人群健康的希望与风险：具有重要意义的公共卫生》，2017年11月
Am J Public Health. 2017 Nov;107(11):1703-1705. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304046.
2
The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research.技术变革的速度：对数字健康行为干预研究的启示
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):816-824. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001.
3
From Big Data to Knowledge in the Social Sciences.从大数据到社会科学中的知识
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2015 May 1;659(1):16-32. doi: 10.1177/0002716215570007.
4
Crowdsourcing applications for public health.众包在公共卫生中的应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.016.
5
How behavioral science can advance digital health.行为科学如何推动数字健康发展。
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Sep;3(3):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0234-z.
6
New media for health education: a revolution in progress.健康教育的新媒体：正在进行的一场革命。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Apr;40(2):129-32. doi: 10.1177/1090198113483140.
7
The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential.通过互联网提供公共卫生干预措施：发挥其潜力。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.
Zotero 插件