• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过移动健康用于健康和行为追踪的模式对美国人群进行特征描述:对美国国家癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查数据的分析。

Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data.

作者信息

Rising Camella J, Jensen Roxanne E, Moser Richard P, Oh April

机构信息

Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.

Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 14;22(5):e16299. doi: 10.2196/16299.

DOI:10.2196/16299
PMID:32406865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7256752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple types of mobile health (mHealth) technologies are available, such as smartphone health apps, fitness trackers, and digital medical devices. However, despite their availability, some individuals do not own, do not realize they own, or own but do not use these technologies. Others may use mHealth devices, but their use varies in tracking health, behaviors, and goals. Examining patterns of mHealth use at the population level can advance our understanding of technology use for health and behavioral tracking. Moreover, investigating sociodemographic and health-related correlates of these patterns can provide direction to researchers about how to target mHealth interventions for diverse audiences.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify patterns of mHealth use for health and behavioral tracking in the US adult population and to characterize the population according to those patterns.

METHODS

We combined data from the 2017 and 2018 National Cancer Institute Health Information National Trends Survey (N=6789) to characterize respondents according to 5 mutually exclusive reported patterns of mHealth use for health and behavioral tracking: (1) mHealth nonowners and nonusers report not owning or using devices to track health, behaviors, or goals; (2) supertrackers track health or behaviors and goals using a smartphone or tablet plus other devices (eg, Fitbit); (3) app trackers use only a smartphone or tablet; (4) device trackers use only nonsmartphone or nontablet devices and do not track goals; and (5) nontrackers report having smartphone or tablet health apps but do not track health, behaviors, or goals.

RESULTS

Being in the mHealth nonowners and nonusers category (vs all mHealth owners and users) is associated with males, older age, lower income, and not being a health information seeker. Among mHealth owners and users, characteristics of device trackers and supertrackers were most distinctive. Compared with supertrackers, device trackers have higher odds of being male (odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI 1.55-3.19), older age (vs 18-34 years; 50-64 years: OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.52-5.30; 65+ years: OR 6.28, 95% CI 3.35-11.79), have an annual household income of US $20,000 to US $49,999 (vs US $75,000+: OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.36-3.91), and have a chronic condition (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.14-2.49). Device trackers also have higher odds of not being health information seekers than supertrackers (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.66-5.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings revealed distinctive sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of the population by pattern of mHealth use, with notable contrasts between those who do and do not use devices to track goals. Several characteristics of individuals who track health or behaviors but not goals (device trackers) are similar to those of mHealth nonowners and nonusers. Our results suggest patterns of mHealth use may inform how to target mHealth interventions to enhance reach and facilitate healthy behaviors.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e55/7256752/597fea578b02/jmir_v22i5e16299_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e55/7256752/597fea578b02/jmir_v22i5e16299_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e55/7256752/597fea578b02/jmir_v22i5e16299_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

多种类型的移动健康(mHealth)技术可供使用,如智能手机健康应用程序、健身追踪器和数字医疗设备。然而,尽管有这些技术,一些人并不拥有、没有意识到自己拥有或拥有但不使用这些技术。其他人可能使用移动健康设备,但他们在追踪健康、行为和目标方面的使用情况各不相同。在人群层面研究移动健康的使用模式可以增进我们对健康和行为追踪技术使用的理解。此外,调查这些模式的社会人口统计学和健康相关关联因素可以为研究人员提供方向,指导他们如何针对不同受众开展移动健康干预措施。

目的

本研究的目的是识别美国成年人群中用于健康和行为追踪的移动健康使用模式,并根据这些模式对人群进行特征描述。

方法

我们将2017年和2018年美国国立癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查的数据(N = 6789)相结合,根据报告的5种相互排斥的移动健康用于健康和行为追踪的模式对受访者进行特征描述:(1)移动健康非拥有者和非使用者报告不拥有或不使用设备来追踪健康、行为或目标;(2)超级追踪者使用智能手机或平板电脑以及其他设备(如Fitbit)来追踪健康、行为和目标;(3)应用程序追踪者仅使用智能手机或平板电脑;(4)设备追踪者仅使用非智能手机或非平板电脑设备且不追踪目标;(5)非追踪者报告拥有智能手机或平板电脑健康应用程序,但不追踪健康、行为或目标。

结果

处于移动健康非拥有者和非使用者类别(与所有移动健康拥有者和使用者相比)与男性、年龄较大、收入较低以及不是健康信息寻求者相关。在移动健康拥有者和使用者中,设备追踪者和超级追踪者的特征最为独特。与超级追踪者相比,设备追踪者为男性的几率更高(优势比[OR] 2.22,95%置信区间1.55 - 3.19),年龄较大(与18 - 34岁相比;50 - 64岁:OR 2.83,95%置信区间1.52 - 5.30;65岁及以上:OR 6.28,95%置信区间3.35 - 11.79),家庭年收入为20,000美元至49,999美元(与75,000美元及以上相比:OR 2.31,95%置信区间1.36 - 3.91),并且患有慢性病(OR 1.69,95%置信区间1.14 - 2.49)。设备追踪者不是健康信息寻求者的几率也比超级追踪者更高(OR 2.98,95%置信区间1.66 - 5.33)。

结论

研究结果揭示了按移动健康使用模式划分的人群在社会人口统计学和健康相关方面的独特特征,在使用设备追踪目标和不使用设备追踪目标的人群之间存在显著差异。追踪健康或行为但不追踪目标的个体(设备追踪者)的几个特征与移动健康非拥有者和非使用者相似。我们的结果表明,移动健康使用模式可能为如何针对性地开展移动健康干预措施以扩大覆盖范围并促进健康行为提供参考。

相似文献

1
Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data.通过移动健康用于健康和行为追踪的模式对美国人群进行特征描述:对美国国家癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查数据的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 14;22(5):e16299. doi: 10.2196/16299.
2
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.
3
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.加拿大数字健康自我追踪运动的传播:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.
4
Evaluation of Menstrual Cycle Tracking Behaviors in the Ovulation and Menstruation Health Pilot Study: Cross-Sectional Study.排卵与月经健康试点研究中月经周期跟踪行为评估:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 27;25:e42164. doi: 10.2196/42164.
5
Attitudes Toward Using COVID-19 mHealth Tools Among Adults With Chronic Health Conditions: Secondary Data Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey.慢性病患者对使用 COVID-19 移动医疗工具的态度:COVID-19 影响调查的二次数据分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 17;8(12):e24693. doi: 10.2196/24693.
6
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.美国高血压患者中手机拥有率、健康类应用程序使用情况以及平板电脑使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228.
7
Use of Tablets and Smartphones to Support Medical Decision Making in US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.平板电脑和智能手机在美国成年人中用于支持医疗决策的使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):e19531. doi: 10.2196/19531.
8
Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data.可穿戴健康和活动追踪器数据共享意愿:2019 年健康信息国家趋势调查数据的分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 13;9(12):e29190. doi: 10.2196/29190.
9
mHealth Apps Use and Their Associations With Healthcare Decision-Making and Health Communication Among Informal Caregivers: Evidence From the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey.移动医疗应用程序的使用及其与非专业照护者医疗决策和健康沟通的关联:来自国家癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Jan;38(1):40-52. doi: 10.1177/08901171231202861. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
10
Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach.谁在使用手机健康应用程序,这重要吗?一种二次数据分析方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of fitness technology use on cancer screening behaviors among American women: Mediation by social media communication and cancer worry (2017-2020).健身技术使用对美国女性癌症筛查行为的影响:社交媒体交流和癌症担忧的中介作用(2017 - 2020年)
Digit Health. 2025 May 1;11:20552076251331893. doi: 10.1177/20552076251331893. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
User Experience and Extended Technology Acceptance Model in Commercial Health Care App Usage Among Patients With Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.癌症患者商业医疗保健应用程序使用中的用户体验与扩展技术接受模型:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 18;26:e55176. doi: 10.2196/55176.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于消费者的可穿戴活动追踪器可提高身体活动参与度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 12;7(4):e11819. doi: 10.2196/11819.
2
Trends of online patient-provider communication among cancer survivors from 2008 to 2017: a digital divide perspective.2008 年至 2017 年癌症幸存者的在线医患沟通趋势:数字鸿沟视角。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Apr;13(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00742-4. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
The influence of mobile health applications on patient - healthcare provider relationships: A systematic, narrative review.
Patterns of digital health access and use among US adults: A latent class analysis.
美国成年人使用数字健康的模式:一项潜在类别分析。
BMC Digit Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Twenty-Five Years of Progress-Lessons Learned From JMIR Publications to Address Gender Parity in Digital Health Authorships: Bibliometric Analysis.25 年的进展——从 JMIR 出版物中汲取的经验教训,以解决数字健康著作中的性别均等问题:文献计量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 9;26:e58950. doi: 10.2196/58950.
5
Association between fitness technology use and physical activity mediated by communication behaviors on social media.社交媒体上的沟通行为介导的健身技术使用与身体活动之间的关联。
Digit Health. 2024 Jul 21;10:20552076241266367. doi: 10.1177/20552076241266367. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Leveraging community Wi-Fi and spaces for digital health use.利用社区 Wi-Fi 和空间进行数字健康应用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 7;12:1418627. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1418627. eCollection 2024.
7
Effectiveness of mHealth App-Based Interventions for Increasing Physical Activity and Improving Physical Fitness in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于移动健康应用程序的干预措施对增加儿童和青少年身体活动和改善身体适应性的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Apr 30;12:e51478. doi: 10.2196/51478.
8
Iterative Patient Testing of a Stimuli-Responsive Swallowing Activity Sensor to Promote Extended User Engagement During the First Year After Radiation: Multiphase Remote and In-Person Observational Cohort Study.对一种刺激响应性吞咽活动传感器进行迭代患者测试,以促进放疗后第一年的长期用户参与:多阶段远程和现场观察性队列研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Feb 28;10:e47359. doi: 10.2196/47359.
9
Association Between the Composite Cardiovascular Risk and mHealth Use Among Adults in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study.2017-2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查中成年人复合心血管风险与移动医疗使用之间的关联:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 4;26:e46277. doi: 10.2196/46277.
10
Determinants and outcomes of eHealth literacy in healthy adults: A systematic review.健康成年人电子健康素养的决定因素和结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291229. eCollection 2023.
移动医疗应用对医患关系的影响:系统、叙事性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jun;102(6):1080-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Health intentions and behaviors of health app owners: a cross-sectional study.健康应用程序使用者的健康意向和行为:一项横断面研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2019 Aug;24(7):819-826. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1576911. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Toward a Common Agenda for the Public and Private Sectors to Advance Digital Health Communication.迈向公共和私营部门推进数字健康通信的共同议程。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(2):221-223. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304806.
6
Wearables and the medical revolution.可穿戴设备与医学革命。
Per Med. 2018 Sep;15(5):429-448. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0044. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings.参与远程测量技术管理健康的障碍与促进因素:系统评价及研究结果的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 12;20(7):e10480. doi: 10.2196/10480.
8
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.加拿大数字健康自我追踪运动的传播:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.
9
A Mobile App to Improve Self-Management of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Realist Evaluation.一款用于改善2型糖尿病患者自我管理的移动应用程序:质性实在论评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 16;20(3):e81. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8712.
10
Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Users: Analysis of Trends by Chronic Disease Status.美国手机用户的健康应用使用情况:按慢性病状况分析趋势
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 19;5(12):e197. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7832.