Suppr超能文献

早期引入姑息治疗是否可以限制重症慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的重症监护、急诊和住院治疗?一项初步的随机研究。

Can Early Introduction of Palliative Care Limit Intensive Care, Emergency and Hospital Admissions in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? A Pilot Randomized Study.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Medical Specialties, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland,

Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care, and Emergency, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Respiration. 2019;97(5):406-415. doi: 10.1159/000495312. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite their poor prognosis, patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have little access to palliative care and tend to have a high rate of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during their last year of life.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility of a home palliative care intervention during 1 year versus usual care, and the possible impact of this intervention on emergency, hospital and ICU admissions, survival, mood, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

Prospective controlled study of patients with severe COPD (GOLD stage III or IV) and long-term oxygen therapy and/or home noninvasive ventilation and/or one or more hospital admissions in the previous year for acute exacerbation, randomized to usual care versus usual care with add-on monthly intervention by palliative care specialists at home for 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 315 patients screened, 49 (15.5%) were randomized (26 to early palliative care; 23 to the control group); aged (mean ± SD) 71 ± 8 years; FEV1 was 37 ± 14% predicted; 88% with a COPD assessment test score > 10; 69% on long-term oxygen therapy or home noninvasive ventilation. The patients accepted the intervention and completed the assessment scales. After 1 year, there was no difference between groups in symptoms, HRQL and mood, and there was a nonsignificant trend for higher admission rates to hospital and emergency wards in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Although this pilot study was underpowered to formally exclude a benefit from palliative care in severe COPD, it raises several questions as to patient selection, reluctance to palliative care in this group, and modalities of future trials.

摘要

背景

尽管患有严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者预后较差,但他们很少接受姑息治疗,并且在生命的最后一年往往有很高的住院和重症监护病房(ICU)入院率。

目的

确定在 1 年内进行家庭姑息治疗干预与常规护理相比的可行性,以及该干预对急诊、住院和 ICU 入院、生存、情绪和健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的可能影响。

方法

对患有严重 COPD(GOLD 阶段 III 或 IV)、长期氧疗和/或家庭无创通气和/或在过去一年因急性加重而住院的患者进行前瞻性对照研究,随机分为常规护理组和常规护理组,常规护理组在 12 个月内每月接受姑息治疗专家的家庭附加干预。

结果

在筛选的 315 名患者中,有 49 名(15.5%)被随机分配(26 名接受早期姑息治疗;23 名进入对照组);年龄(平均值±标准差)为 71±8 岁;FEV1 为预计值的 37±14%;88%的患者 COPD 评估测试评分>10;69%的患者接受长期氧疗或家庭无创通气。患者接受了干预并完成了评估量表。1 年后,两组在症状、HRQL 和情绪方面没有差异,干预组的住院和急诊病房入院率有升高的趋势,但无统计学意义。

结论

尽管这项初步研究的效力不足以正式排除姑息治疗对严重 COPD 的益处,但它提出了一些问题,例如患者选择、该组对姑息治疗的不情愿以及未来试验的模式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验