Centre for Health Economics in London, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.
BMJ. 2019 Jan 16;364:k5300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5300.
To investigate the prevalence of financial interests among patient organisations contributing to health technology assessment at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England and the extent to which NICE's disclosure policy ensures that decision making committees are aware of these interests.
Policy review using accounts, annual reports, and websites of patient organisations; payments declared by pharmaceutical manufacturers on their websites and a centralised database (Disclosure UK); declarations of interests by nominated representatives of patient organisations; and responses from patient organisations.
Appraisals of medicines and treatments (technologies) for use in the English and Welsh National Health Service.
53 patient organisations contributing to 41 NICE technology appraisals published in 2015 and 2016, with 117 separate occasions that a patient organisation contributed to the appraisal of a technology.
Prevalence of specific interests (that is, funding from manufacturer(s) of a technology under appraisal or competitor products); proportion of specific interests of which NICE's decision making committees were aware; proportion of unknown specific interests for which disclosure was not required by NICE's policy RESULTS: 38/53 (72%) patient organisations had accepted funding from the manufacturer(s) of a technology or a competitor product in the same year that they had contributed to the appraisal of that technology or the previous year. Specific interests were present on 92/117 (79%) occasions that patient organisations contributed to appraisals in 2015 and 2016. NICE's decision making committees were aware of less than a quarter of specific interests (30/144; 21%). For nearly two thirds of the specific interests not known to committees (71/114; 62%), disclosure by patient organisations was not required by NICE's policy.
Financial interests are highly prevalent among patient organisations contributing to health technology assessment. NICE should review its disclosure policy to ensure that decision making committees are aware of all relevant interests.
调查在英格兰国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)为健康技术评估做出贡献的患者组织中财务利益的普遍程度,以及 NICE 的披露政策在多大程度上确保决策委员会了解这些利益。
使用患者组织的账目、年度报告和网站进行政策审查;制药商在其网站和集中数据库(英国披露)上申报的款项;患者组织提名代表的利益申报;以及患者组织的回应。
用于英格兰和威尔士国民保健服务的药品和治疗方法(技术)评估。
53 个为 2015 年和 2016 年发布的 41 项 NICE 技术评估做出贡献的患者组织,其中 117 次患者组织为技术评估做出贡献。
特定利益的流行程度(即评估中的技术的制造商或竞争对手产品的资金);NICE 决策委员会知晓的特定利益的比例;NICE 政策要求披露但未知的特定利益的比例。
38/53(72%)的患者组织在当年或前一年为评估的技术提供资金,接受了制造商(制造商)或竞争对手产品的资金。2015 年和 2016 年,患者组织在评估中出现特定利益的情况为 92/117(79%)次。NICE 的决策委员会仅了解不到四分之一的特定利益(30/144;21%)。对于委员会不知道的近三分之二的特定利益(71/114;62%),NICE 的政策不需要患者组织披露。
参与健康技术评估的患者组织中财务利益普遍存在。NICE 应审查其披露政策,以确保决策委员会了解所有相关利益。