Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Virol. 2019 Mar 21;93(7). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01846-18. Print 2019 Apr 1.
The goals of preclinical HIV vaccine studies in nonhuman primates are to develop and test different approaches for their ability to generate protective immunity. Here, we compared the impact of 7 different vaccine modalities, all expressing the HIV-1 1086.C clade C envelope (Env), on (i) the magnitude and durability of antigen-specific serum antibody responses and (ii) autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibody capacity. These vaccination regimens included immunization with different combinations of DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), soluble gp140 protein, and different adjuvants. Serum samples collected from 130 immunized monkeys at two key time points were analyzed using the TZM-bl cell assay: at 2 weeks after the final immunization (week 40/41) and on the day of challenge (week 58). Key initial findings were that inclusion of a gp140 protein boost had a significant impact on the magnitude and durability of Env-specific IgG antibodies, and addition of 3M-052 adjuvant was associated with better neutralizing activity against the SHIV1157ipd3N4 challenge virus and a heterologous HIV-1 CRF01 Env, CNE8. We measured neutralization against a panel of 12 tier 2 Envs using a newly described computational tool to quantify serum neutralization potency by factoring in the predetermined neutralization tier of each reference Env. This analysis revealed modest neutralization breadth, with DNA/MVA immunization followed by gp140 protein boosts in 3M-052 adjuvant producing the best scores. This study highlights that protein-containing regimens provide a solid foundation for the further development of novel adjuvants and inclusion of trimeric Env immunogens that could eventually elicit a higher level of neutralizing antibody breadth. Despite much progress, we still do not have a clear understanding of how to elicit a protective neutralizing antibody response against HIV-1 through vaccination. There have been great strides in the development of envelope immunogens that mimic the virus particle, but less is known about how different vaccination modalities and adjuvants contribute to shaping the antibody response. We compared seven different vaccines that were administered to rhesus macaques and that delivered the same envelope protein through various modalities and with different adjuvants. The results demonstrate that some vaccine components are better than others at eliciting neutralizing antibodies with breadth.
临床前 HIV 疫苗研究的目标是开发和测试不同方法的能力,以产生保护性免疫。在这里,我们比较了 7 种不同疫苗模式的影响,所有这些模式都表达了 HIV-1 1086.C 组包膜(Env),(i)抗原特异性血清抗体反应的幅度和持久性,以及(ii)自体和异源中和抗体能力。这些疫苗方案包括用不同组合的 DNA、改良的痘苗病毒安卡拉(MVA)、可溶性 gp140 蛋白和不同佐剂进行免疫接种。在两个关键时间点从 130 只免疫猴子收集的血清样本使用 TZM-bl 细胞测定法进行分析:在最后一次免疫后 2 周(第 40/41 周)和挑战日(第 58 周)。主要的初步发现是,gp140 蛋白加强免疫对 Env 特异性 IgG 抗体的幅度和持久性有显著影响,而添加 3M-052 佐剂与更好的中和活性有关针对 SHIV1157ipd3N4 挑战病毒和异源 HIV-1 CRF01 Env,CNE8。我们使用新描述的计算工具测量了针对 12 种 2 级Env 的中和作用,该工具通过考虑每个参考Env 的预定中和等级来量化血清中和效力。该分析显示中和作用的范围适度,DNA/MVA 免疫接种后,在 3M-052 佐剂中添加 gp140 蛋白可获得最佳评分。这项研究强调,含有蛋白质的方案为进一步开发新型佐剂和包含三聚体Env 免疫原提供了坚实的基础,这些免疫原最终可能引发更高水平的中和抗体广度。尽管取得了很大进展,但我们仍然不了解如何通过疫苗接种引发针对 HIV-1 的保护性中和抗体反应。在开发模拟病毒颗粒的包膜免疫原方面已经取得了很大进展,但对于不同的疫苗模式和佐剂如何影响抗体反应知之甚少。我们比较了七种不同的疫苗,这些疫苗被给予恒河猴,并通过不同的方式和不同的佐剂传递相同的包膜蛋白。结果表明,在引发具有广度的中和抗体方面,一些疫苗成分优于其他成分。