School of Economics and Management, Centre for Economic Demography and Department of Economic History, Lund University, Box 7083, 220 07, Lund, Sweden.
Demography. 2019 Apr;56(2):679-706. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0758-4.
Do early-life effects of investments in public health persist to the oldest-old ages? This article answers this question by using the primary care reform in rural Sweden that between 1890 and 1917 led to the establishment of local health districts, together with openings of hospitals and recruitments of medical personnel, as a natural experiment in early-life environmental conditions. The initiatives undertaken within these districts targeted control of infectious diseases, including various isolation and disinfection measures. This study applies a difference-in-differences method combined with propensity score matching to register-based individual-level data for Sweden from 1968 to 2012 and to multisource, purposely collected data on the reform implementation. Providing pioneering evidence for such a distal relationship (ages 78-95), this study finds that treatment through primary care in the year of birth leads to a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (4 % to 6%) and mortality from cardiovascular diseases (5 % to 6 %) and to an increase in average incomes (2 % to 3 %). The effects are universal and somewhat stronger among individuals from poor socioeconomic backgrounds and at higher baseline levels of disease burden.
投资于公共卫生的早期影响是否会持续到最年长的年龄?本文通过利用瑞典农村地区的初级保健改革作为早期环境条件的自然实验来回答这个问题。1890 年至 1917 年间,这一改革导致了地方卫生区的建立,同时还开设了医院并招募了医务人员。这些地区开展的各项活动旨在控制传染病,包括采取各种隔离和消毒措施。本研究应用了双重差分法结合倾向评分匹配,利用瑞典 1968 年至 2012 年的基于登记的个人层面数据以及针对改革实施情况的多源、有针对性收集的数据。该研究为这种远距离关系(78-95 岁)提供了开创性的证据,发现出生年份通过初级保健进行治疗可显著降低全因死亡率(4%至 6%)和心血管疾病死亡率(5%至 6%),并提高平均收入(2%至 3%)。这些影响是普遍存在的,在社会经济背景较差和疾病负担较高的个体中,影响更为显著。