• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发健康路径以规范基于患者报告结果和临床实践指南的癌症护理路径。

Development of Health Pathways to Standardize Cancer Care Pathways Informed by Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Practice Guidelines.

作者信息

Girgis Afaf, Durcinoska Ivana, Koh Eng-Siew, Ng Weng, Arnold Anthony, Delaney Geoff P

机构信息

Afaf Girgis, Ivana Durcinoska, and Geoff P. Delaney, The University of New South Wales, Sydney; Eng-Siew Koh, Weng Ng, and Geoff P. Delaney, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool; and Anthony Arnold, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00024.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.18.00024
PMID:30652587
Abstract

PURPOSE

High-quality symptom management and supportive care are essential components of comprehensive cancer care. We aimed to describe the development of an evidence-based automated decisional algorithm for patients with cancer that had specific, actionable, clinical, evidence-based recommendations to improve patient care, communication, and management.

METHODS

We reviewed existing literature and clinical practice guidelines to identify priority domains of patient care and potential clinical recommendations. Two multidisciplinary clinical advisory groups used a two-stage consensus decision-making approach to determine domains of care and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and subsequently developed automated algorithms with clear clinical recommendations amendable to intervention in clinical settings.

RESULTS

Algorithms were developed to inform management of patient symptoms, distress, and unmet needs. Three PRO measures were chosen: Distress Thermometer and problem checklist, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, and the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Screening Tool 9. PRO items were mapped to five domains of patient well-being: physical, emotional, practical, social and family, and maintenance of well-being. A total of 15 actionable clinical recommendations tailored to specific issues of concern were established.

CONCLUSION

Using automated algorithms and clinical recommendations provides a platform for streamlining and systematizing the use of PROs to inform risk-stratified guideline-informed care. The series of algorithms, which set out systematized care pathways for the clinical care of patients with cancer, can be used to potentially inform patient-centered care.

摘要

目的

高质量的症状管理和支持性护理是综合癌症护理的重要组成部分。我们旨在描述一种基于证据的自动化决策算法的开发,该算法针对癌症患者,具有具体、可操作、基于临床证据的建议,以改善患者护理、沟通和管理。

方法

我们回顾了现有文献和临床实践指南,以确定患者护理的优先领域和潜在的临床建议。两个多学科临床咨询小组采用两阶段共识决策方法来确定护理领域和患者报告结局(PRO)指标,随后开发了具有明确临床建议的自动化算法,这些建议适用于临床环境中的干预。

结果

开发了算法以指导患者症状、痛苦和未满足需求的管理。选择了三项PRO指标:痛苦温度计和问题清单、埃德蒙顿症状评估量表以及支持性护理需求调查-筛查工具9。PRO项目被映射到患者福祉的五个领域:身体、情感、实际、社会和家庭以及福祉维持。共制定了15条针对特定关注问题的可操作临床建议。

结论

使用自动化算法和临床建议为简化和系统化PRO的使用提供了一个平台,以指导基于风险分层的指南指导护理。这一系列算法为癌症患者的临床护理设定了系统化的护理路径,可用于潜在地指导以患者为中心的护理。

相似文献

1
Development of Health Pathways to Standardize Cancer Care Pathways Informed by Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Practice Guidelines.开发健康路径以规范基于患者报告结果和临床实践指南的癌症护理路径。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00024.
2
Development of generic quality indicators for patient-centered cancer care by using a RAND modified Delphi method.采用 RAND 改良 Delphi 法制定以患者为中心的癌症护理通用质量指标。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):29-37. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318210e3a2.
3
Development of a meta-algorithm for guiding primary care encounters for patients with multimorbidity using evidence-based and case-based guideline development methodology.使用基于证据和基于案例的指南制定方法,开发一种元算法,用于指导患有多种疾病的患者的初级保健诊疗。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 22;7(6):e015478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015478.
4
Interpreting and Acting on the PRO Scores From the Patient-reported Outcomes for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) eHealth System.解读并应用患者报告的个性化治疗和护理结局(PROMPT-Care)电子健康系统的 PRO 评分。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S85-S91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001094.
5
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理的国际循证指南推荐意见。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.
6
Clinical evaluation and management strategy for sexual dysfunction in men and women.男性和女性性功能障碍的临床评估与管理策略
J Sex Med. 2004 Jul;1(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10108.x.
7
Assessment of a personalized and distributed patient guidance system.个性化分布式患者指导系统的评估
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:108-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.基层医疗实践中支持乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的系统不完善。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1148-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3726-y. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Using Qualitative Research to Inform Development of Professional Guidelines: A Case Study of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Family-Centered Care Guidelines.运用定性研究为专业指南的制定提供信息:以危重病医学会家庭为中心的护理指南为例。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;45(8):1352-1358. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002523.
10
Recommendations for the Organization of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care Teams in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病多学科临床护理团队组织建议。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(3):1087-1098. doi: 10.3233/JPD-202078.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and provider assessment of a new oncology network with care pathways for gastrointestinal cancer patients: the collaborative approach.针对胃肠道癌症患者,开发并通过护理路径对新型肿瘤学网络进行提供者评估:协作方法。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14710-y.
2
Physician perspectives on chronic pain management: barriers and the use of eHealth in the COVID-19 era.医生对慢性疼痛管理的看法:COVID-19 时代的障碍和电子健康的使用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):1131. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10157-8.
3
Supportive care needs and related factors among colorectal cancer patients with stoma in the postoperative rehabilitation period from a bio-psycho-social perspective: a cross-sectional study.
从生物-心理-社会角度探讨结直肠癌造口术后康复期患者的支持性照顾需求及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Sep 29;31(10):599. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08067-w.
4
Cancer Care Team's Management of Clinical Alerts Generated by Electronically Collected Patient Reported Outcomes: We Could Do Better.癌症护理团队对电子采集的患者报告结局生成的临床警报的管理:我们可以做得更好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 21;20(3):2001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032001.
5
Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.肿瘤学中的患者报告结局:观念转变——系统综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 May 21;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01987-x.
6
Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care): Multicenter Pragmatic Nonrandomized Trial.基于网络的患者报告结局测量用于个性化治疗和护理(PROMPT-Care):多中心实用非随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e19685. doi: 10.2196/19685.
7
From Patient Engagement to Precision Oncology: Leveraging Informatics to Advance Cancer Care.从患者参与到精准肿瘤学:利用信息学推进癌症护理。
Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug;29(1):235-242. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701983. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Cancer survivorship care during COVID-19-perspectives and recommendations from the MASCC survivorship study group.COVID-19期间的癌症幸存者护理——MASCC幸存者研究小组的观点与建议
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3485-3488. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05544-4.
9
What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence.卫生专业人员对肿瘤学实践中患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的态度是什么?定性证据的混合方法综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4939-7.
10
The day after: correlates of patient-reported outcomes with actigraphy-assessed sleep in cancer patients at home (inCASA project).次日:居家癌症患者的患者报告结局与活动记录仪评估睡眠的相关性(inCASA 项目)。
Sleep. 2019 Oct 9;42(10). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz146.