Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 21;20(3):2001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032001.
Electronically administered patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are effective digital health tools for informing clinicians about cancer patients' symptoms and facilitating timely patient-centred care. This paper describes the delivery of healthcare activities supported by the PROMPT-Care model, including ePROMs generated clinical alerts, cancer care team (CCT) response to alerts, and patients' perceptions of the CCT response and ePROMs system. This mixed-methods study includes cancer patients from four cancer therapy centres in New South Wales, Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected regarding clinical alert activity, CCT response, and patient perceptions of the CCT responses and ePROMs system. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Of the 328 participants whose care was informed by the digital health tool, 70.8% ( = 233) generated at least one alert during the trial period, with 877 alerts generated in total. Although 43.7% ( = 383) were actioned by the CCT, at least 80% of participants found follow-up CCT phone calls beneficial, with multiple benefits confirmed in interviews. The cancer care delivery arm of the PROMPT-Care trial involving clinical alerts to the CCT was positively perceived by most participants, resulting in a diverse range of benefits. However, further work is required, informed by implementation science, to improve the percentage of actioned clinical alerts.
电子患者报告结局测量(ePROMs)是一种有效的数字健康工具,可向临床医生提供癌症患者的症状信息,并促进以患者为中心的及时护理。本文描述了 PROMPT-Care 模型支持的医疗保健活动的实施情况,包括 ePROMs 生成的临床警报、癌症护理团队(CCT)对警报的响应以及患者对 CCT 响应和 ePROMs 系统的看法。这项混合方法研究纳入了来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州四个癌症治疗中心的癌症患者。研究收集了关于临床警报活动、CCT 响应以及患者对 CCT 响应和 ePROMs 系统的看法的定量和定性数据。定性数据采用主题分析法进行分析。在接受数字健康工具提供的护理的 328 名参与者中,有 70.8%(=233)在试验期间至少生成了一个警报,共生成了 877 个警报。尽管 CCT 对 43.7%(=383)个警报采取了行动,但至少 80%的参与者认为 CCT 的后续电话随访有益,访谈中还确认了多种益处。PROMPT-Care 试验中涉及向 CCT 发送临床警报的癌症护理实施情况得到了大多数参与者的积极评价,产生了多种益处。然而,需要进一步的工作,借鉴实施科学,以提高已采取行动的临床警报的百分比。