Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):759-768. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.016.
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an adverse prognosticator of prostate cancer. However, the roles of proportion and architectural patterns of intraductal prostate carcinoma in patient outcomes remain unclear.
We retrospectively analyzed data on 644 patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer between 2010 and 2017. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was identified from 12-core prostate biopsy. We calculated the proportion of intraductal prostate carcinoma and identified patterns according to the 2016 WHO classification. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics between patients with and without intraductal prostate carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used for survival analyses. The end points were castration resistant prostate cancer-free survival and overall survival.
Of the 644 patients 180 (28.0%) harbored intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. A 10% or greater incidence of the carcinoma was independently associated with worse prognosis (castration resistant prostate cancer-free survival HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.51-2.81, p <0.001, and overall survival HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.52-4.16, p <0.001), as was pattern 2 intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.40-2.49, p <0.001, and HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.29-3.46, p = 0.003, respectively). Based on these 2 risk factors all men were classified into 5 groups. Patients in group 0 (no intraductal carcinoma of the prostate) and prostate intraductal carcinoma group 1 (less than 10% intraductal carcinoma, pattern 1) had favorable median castration resistant prostate cancer-free survival (18.0 vs 16.9 months, p = 0.871) and median overall survival (neither reached, p = 0.698). Men in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate group 4 (10% or greater intraductal carcinoma, pattern 2) harbored the worst outcomes (median castration resistant prostate cancer-free and overall survival 8.4 and 29.9 months, respectively). Group 2 (less than 10% intraductal carcinoma, pattern 2, with median castration resistant prostate cancer-free and overall survival 14.2 and 45.9 months) and group 3 (10% or less prostate intraductal carcinoma, pattern 1, with median castration resistant prostate cancer-free and overall survival 11.9 and 39.7 months, respectively) had an intermediate prognosis.
A 10% or greater proportion of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and pattern 2 were 2 unfavorable prognosticators of metastatic prostate cancer. Pathological reporting criteria based on intraductal carcinoma of the prostate could improve the prediction of patient outcomes and optimize treatment decisions.
前列腺导管内癌是前列腺癌的不良预后因素。然而,前列腺导管内癌的比例和结构模式在患者预后中的作用仍不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2017 年间 644 例新发转移性前列腺癌患者的数据。从 12 芯前列腺活检中识别前列腺导管内癌。我们根据 2016 年世卫组织分类计算了前列腺导管内癌的比例,并确定了模式。对有和没有前列腺导管内癌的患者进行倾向评分匹配,以平衡基线特征。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归进行生存分析。终点为去势抵抗性前列腺癌无复发生存和总生存。
在 644 例患者中,180 例(28.0%)存在前列腺导管内癌。10%或以上的癌发生率与预后不良独立相关(去势抵抗性前列腺癌无复发生存 HR 2.06,95%CI 1.51-2.81,p<0.001,总生存 HR 2.52,95%CI 1.52-4.16,p<0.001),模式 2 前列腺导管内癌也是如此(HR 1.86,95%CI 1.40-2.49,p<0.001,HR 2.12,95%CI 1.29-3.46,p=0.003)。基于这两个危险因素,所有男性被分为 5 组。组 0 患者(无前列腺导管内癌)和前列腺导管内癌组 1 患者(<10%导管内癌,模式 1)的中位去势抵抗性前列腺癌无复发生存期(18.0 个月 vs 16.9 个月,p=0.871)和中位总生存期(均未达到,p=0.698)无差异。组 4 患者(10%或以上的前列腺导管内癌,模式 2)的预后最差(中位去势抵抗性前列腺癌无复发生存和总生存分别为 8.4 和 29.9 个月)。组 2(<10%的前列腺导管内癌,模式 2,中位去势抵抗性前列腺癌无复发生存和总生存分别为 14.2 和 45.9 个月)和组 3(<10%的前列腺导管内癌,模式 1,中位去势抵抗性前列腺癌无复发生存和总生存分别为 11.9 和 39.7 个月)的预后为中间型。
前列腺导管内癌的 10%或以上比例和模式 2 是转移性前列腺癌的 2 个不良预后因素。基于前列腺导管内癌的病理报告标准可以提高对患者预后的预测能力,并优化治疗决策。