Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):405-414. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818476. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Knowing yourself requires knowing not only what you are like in general (trait self-knowledge) but also how your personality fluctuates from moment to moment (state self-knowledge). We examined this latter form of self-knowledge. Participants (248 people; 2,938 observations) wore the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), an unobtrusive audio recorder, and completed experience-sampling self-reports of their personality states four times each day for 1 week. We estimated state self-knowledge by comparing self-reported personality states with consensual observer ratings of personality states coded from the EAR files, which formed the criterion for what participants were "actually" like in the moment. People had self-insight into their momentary extraversion, conscientiousness, and likely neuroticism, suggesting that people can accurately detect fluctuations in some aspects of their personality. However, the evidence for self-insight was weaker for agreeableness. This apparent self-ignorance may be partly responsible for interpersonal problems and for blind spots in trait self-knowledge.
了解自己不仅需要知道自己的一般特点(特质自我认知),还需要知道自己的个性如何时刻变化(状态自我认知)。我们研究了后者形式的自我认知。参与者(248 人;2938 次观察)佩戴电子激活记录器(EAR),这是一种不引人注目的音频记录器,并在一周内每天四次完成对人格状态的经验抽样自我报告。我们通过将自我报告的人格状态与从 EAR 文件中编码的共识观察者对人格状态的评分进行比较来估计状态自我认知,这形成了参与者在当下“实际”情况的标准。人们对自己的瞬间外向、尽责和可能的神经质有自我洞察力,这表明人们可以准确地检测到自己个性的某些方面的波动。然而,对于宜人性,自我洞察力的证据较弱。这种明显的自我忽视可能部分解释了人际问题和特质自我认知的盲点。