University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 14;15(1):6375. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50294-0.
Wisdom is the hallmark of social judgment, but how people across cultures recognize wisdom remains unclear-distinct philosophical traditions suggest different views of wisdom's cardinal features. We explore perception of wise minds across 16 socio-economically and culturally diverse convenience samples from 12 countries. Participants assessed wisdom exemplars, non-exemplars, and themselves on 19 socio-cognitive characteristics, subsequently rating targets' wisdom, knowledge, and understanding. Analyses reveal two positively related dimensions-Reflective Orientation and Socio-Emotional Awareness. These dimensions are consistent across the studied cultural regions and interact when informing wisdom ratings: wisest targets-as perceived by participants-score high on both dimensions, whereas the least wise are not reflective but moderately socio-emotional. Additionally, individuals view themselves as less reflective but more socio-emotionally aware than most wisdom exemplars. Our findings expand folk psychology and social judgment research beyond the Global North, showing how individuals perceive desirable cognitive and socio-emotional qualities, and contribute to an understanding of mind perception.
智慧是社会判断的标志,但不同文化背景的人如何识别智慧尚不清楚——不同的哲学传统对智慧的主要特征有不同的看法。我们探索了来自 12 个国家的 16 个具有不同社会经济和文化背景的便利样本中人们对智慧头脑的看法。参与者根据 19 种社会认知特征对智慧典范、非典范和自身进行评估,然后对目标的智慧、知识和理解进行评分。分析揭示了两个正相关的维度——反思取向和社会情感意识。这两个维度在研究的文化区域中是一致的,并且在影响智慧评分时相互作用:被参与者认为最智慧的目标在这两个维度上得分都很高,而最不智慧的目标则不具有反思性,但具有中等的社会情感性。此外,个体认为自己比大多数智慧典范更不具有反思性,但更具有社会情感意识。我们的发现扩展了超越全球北方的民间心理学和社会判断研究,展示了个体如何感知理想的认知和社会情感品质,并有助于理解心理感知。