Suppr超能文献

通过对血清特异性背景噪音进行归一化来降低间接 ELISA 误诊风险:以检测抗 FGFR3 自身抗体为例。

Reducing the risk of misdiagnosis of indirect ELISA by normalizing serum-specific background noise: The example of detecting anti-FGFR3 autoantibodies.

机构信息

Synaptopathies and Autoantibodies, Faculty of Medicine Jacques Lisfranc, University Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, Saint-Étienne, France; Synaptopathies and Autoantibodies, Institut NeuroMyoGene INSERM U1217/CNRS UMR 5310, University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Synaptopathies and Autoantibodies, Faculty of Medicine Jacques Lisfranc, University Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, Saint-Étienne, France; Synaptopathies and Autoantibodies, Institut NeuroMyoGene INSERM U1217/CNRS UMR 5310, University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Biochemistry Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2019 Mar;466:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Abstract

Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is an important diagnostic method as it enables the quantification of the presence of autoantibodies in human blood sera. However, unspecific binding of antibodies to the solid phase causes considerable serum-specific background noise (SSBN), involving the risk of false positive diagnosis. Therefore, we present a simple and concise, yet obvious proof-of-principle of a recently suggested normalization method. The method is based on subtracting SSBN by using non-coated ELISA wells as a control for each serum-of-interest. We performed ELISA to quantify anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) antibody levels in three positive controls (two anti-FGFR3-positive patients and a rabbit antiserum against FGFR3) and 58 negative controls (healthy blood donors). In all subjects, we found considerable unspecific reactivity which strongly varied among subjects. The conventional normalization method was not able to balance this strong SSBN, as demonstrated by 2/58 false positive healthy controls and one FGFR3-positive patient that was hidden in the noise (false negative). SSBN normalization reduced the frequency of false-positives to 0/58. Further, all three anti-FGFR3-positive sera were successfully detected and even doubled their z-score used to determine positivity. Albeit occupying more space on the ELISA plate, we strongly recommend considering this normalization method when working with blood sera. To better put the idea across to the community, we depict the SSBN issue and its solution in a graphic scheme. We conclude that SSBN normalization increases the sensitivity and specificity of indirect ELISA and thereby reduces the risk of false positive and false negative diagnosis. © 2019. Licensed under the Creative Commons [CC BY-NC 4.0 licence, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2019.01.004].

摘要

间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)是一种重要的诊断方法,因为它能够定量检测人血清中自身抗体的存在。然而,抗体对固相的非特异性结合会导致相当大的血清特异性背景噪声(SSBN),从而增加假阳性诊断的风险。因此,我们提出了一种简单明了但又明显的最近提出的归一化方法的原理证明。该方法基于使用非包被的 ELISA 孔作为每个感兴趣血清的对照来减去 SSBN。我们进行了 ELISA 实验以定量测定三个阳性对照(两个抗 FGFR3 阳性患者和针对 FGFR3 的兔抗血清)和 58 个阴性对照(健康献血者)中的抗成纤维细胞生长因子受体 3(FGFR3)抗体水平。在所有受试者中,我们发现了相当大的非特异性反应性,这种反应性在受试者之间差异很大。传统的归一化方法无法平衡这种强烈的 SSBN,这表现在 58 个健康对照中有 2 个出现假阳性,一个 FGFR3 阳性患者被噪声所掩盖(假阴性)。SSBN 归一化将假阳性的频率降低至 0/58。此外,所有三个抗 FGFR3 阳性血清都被成功检测到,甚至将用于确定阳性的 z 分数提高了一倍。尽管在 ELISA 板上占用了更多的空间,但我们强烈建议在处理血清时考虑这种归一化方法。为了更好地向社区传达这个想法,我们以图形方案描绘了 SSBN 问题及其解决方案。我们得出结论,SSBN 归一化提高了间接 ELISA 的灵敏度和特异性,从而降低了假阳性和假阴性诊断的风险。2019 年版权所有。根据 CC BY-NC 4.0 许可 获得许可,允许非商业性使用、复制和传播。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验