Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Sex Med. 2019 Feb;16(2):278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
Studies of pain measurement in women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) use various methods of capturing pain intensity. The degree to which these different measures of pain correspond with one another is not known.
To compare 3 different measures of pain intensity in sexually active women with PVD participating in a clinical treatment study.
A total of 64 women (mean age 30.9 years) provided baseline measures of pain intensity using (i) a numeric rating scale that provided a self-report of pain during recalled vaginal penetration; (ii) the pain subscale of the female sexual function index; and (iii) pain elicited with a vulvalgesiometer, an objective method of eliciting pain.
Correlations among these 3 measures of pain were moderate in size (range r = 0.39-0.61). Moreover, the numeric rating scale of pain was more likely to be associated with self-reported measures of pain catastrophizing and pain hypervigilance than were scores on the pain subscale of the female sexual function index or scores from the vulvalgesiometer.
Overall, there was a moderate level of correlation between different often-used measures of pain in women with PVD. These findings suggest that, in addition to measuring a common dimension, these different measures tap into different aspects of women's experiences with vulvovaginal pain, and researchers should consider how the chosen measure addresses their primary research question when selecting pain measures in future PVD research.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A strength of this study was the large sample size (n = 64 sexually active women) who had received confirmed clinical diagnoses of PVD. 1 limitation of the findings is that our self-report outcome measures are based on retrospective ratings of pain over 4 weeks, and it is possible that other variables, such as mood, could have impacted scores on these measures.
This study showed statistically significant and moderate correlations among 3 different pain measures widely used in PVD research and treatment. In addition, only 1 pain measure showed a significant independent association with emotion function measures. These findings provide a rationale for including multiple measures of pain and emotional function in treatment outcome studies of PVD. Wammen Rathenborg FL, Zdaniuk B, Brotto LA. What Do Different Measures of Pain Tell Us? A Comparison in Sexually Active Women With Provoked Vestibulodynia. J Sex Med 2019;16:278-288.
研究在患有诱发性外阴痛(PVD)的女性中疼痛测量使用了各种捕捉疼痛强度的方法。这些不同的疼痛测量方法之间的相互关系尚不清楚。
比较参与临床治疗研究的患有 PVD 的有性生活的女性中 3 种不同的疼痛强度测量方法。
共有 64 名女性(平均年龄 30.9 岁)使用(i)数字评分量表提供回忆阴道插入时疼痛的自我报告;(ii)女性性功能指数的疼痛分量表;和(iii)外阴测痛计诱发的疼痛来提供基线疼痛强度测量。外阴测痛计是一种诱发疼痛的客观方法。
这 3 种疼痛测量方法之间的相关性中等(范围 r=0.39-0.61)。此外,数字评分量表疼痛与自我报告的疼痛灾难化和疼痛警觉性测量指标的相关性大于女性性功能指数的疼痛分量表或外阴测痛计的评分。
总的来说,患有 PVD 的女性中不同的常用疼痛测量方法之间存在中等水平的相关性。这些发现表明,除了测量共同维度外,这些不同的测量方法还反映了女性在阴道疼痛方面的不同体验,研究人员在未来的 PVD 研究中选择疼痛测量方法时,应考虑所选方法如何解决他们的主要研究问题。
本研究的一个优势是有大量(n=64 名有性生活的女性)患有经过确认的临床诊断的 PVD 的女性参与。研究结果的局限性之一是,我们的自我报告结局测量基于对过去 4 周的疼痛的回顾性评分,并且其他变量(例如情绪)可能会影响这些评分。
本研究表明在 PVD 研究和治疗中广泛使用的 3 种不同疼痛测量方法之间存在统计学上显著的中等相关性。此外,只有 1 种疼痛测量方法与情绪功能测量指标有显著的独立关联。这些发现为在 PVD 的治疗结局研究中纳入多种疼痛和情绪功能测量方法提供了依据。