Lev-Sagie Ahinoam, Rayan-Gharra Nosaiba, Allouche-Kam Hadas, Granot Michal
Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Clalit Health Organization, Jerusalem, Israel.
Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Jul 1;16:1199-1210. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S441863. eCollection 2024.
A diagnostic algorithm was recently suggested to address the underlying mechanisms of provoked-vestibulodynia (PVD). It delineates four subgroups (Hormonal-associated, Augmented-anterior, Hymenal-associated and Hypertonicity-associated), each manifesting a distinctive vulvar pain-hypersensitivity regarding location (circumferential vs posterior-only vestibulodynia) and pain characteristics. We aimed to explore the significance of various experimentally induced vulvar pain measures in the manifestation of pain hypersensitivity in each subgroup.
Women with PVD (n = 113) and 43 controls reported pain intensity provoked during vaginal penetration and tampon insertion. Vestibular tenderness (anterior and posterior) was assessed by Q-tip test, and pressure stimulation delivered to the puborectalis assessed muscle tenderness. Pain thresholds were measured using a vulvar-algesiometer. These measures were compared between patients and controls and among the PVD subgroups. Correlations between the clinical and experimentally induced-pain measures were assessed. Finally, to address whether the association between experimentally induced-pain measures and dyspareunia severity is mediated by hypertonicity, the conditional indirect effect was analyzed in each subgroup.
Compared to controls, augmented vulvar pain-hypersensitivity and hypertonicity were observed among patients (p < 0.001). ANOVA revealed no subgroup differences in dyspareunia severity. Nevertheless, some experimentally induced-pain measures were differently correlated with dyspareunia intensity in each subgroup, allowing discrimination of subgroups according to the unique findings of vulvar pain-hypersensitivity. The degree of pelvic floor muscle-hypertonicity mediated the association between vulvar pain-hypersensitivity and dyspareunia severity, emphasizing the key role of hypertonicity in distinguishing between subgroups.
The findings offer more evidence of variations among PVD subtypes, demonstrating that insertional dyspareunia may originate from dissimilar alterations in the mucosal and muscular tissues. The results also emphasize the significance of utilizing a wide battery of tests to capture different experimentally induced-pain measures, revealing the unique patterns of vulvar pain-hypersensitivity in each subgroup.
最近有人提出一种诊断算法来探讨激发性前庭痛(PVD)的潜在机制。该算法划分出四个亚组(激素相关型、增强型前部、处女膜相关型和高张相关型),每个亚组在外阴疼痛超敏反应的位置(圆周性与仅后部前庭痛)和疼痛特征方面都表现出独特性。我们旨在探讨各种实验诱导的外阴疼痛测量指标在每个亚组疼痛超敏反应表现中的意义。
113名PVD女性患者和43名对照者报告了阴道插入和使用卫生棉条时引发的疼痛强度。通过棉签试验评估前庭压痛(前部和后部),并通过对耻骨直肠肌施加压力刺激来评估肌肉压痛。使用外阴痛觉计测量疼痛阈值。对患者和对照者以及PVD亚组之间的这些测量指标进行比较。评估临床和实验诱导的疼痛测量指标之间的相关性。最后,为了探讨实验诱导的疼痛测量指标与性交困难严重程度之间的关联是否由高张介导,在每个亚组中分析条件间接效应。
与对照者相比,患者中观察到外阴疼痛超敏反应增强和高张(p < 0.001)。方差分析显示性交困难严重程度在亚组间无差异。然而,一些实验诱导的疼痛测量指标在每个亚组中与性交困难强度的相关性不同,这使得能够根据外阴疼痛超敏反应的独特发现区分亚组。盆底肌肉高张程度介导了外阴疼痛超敏反应与性交困难严重程度之间的关联,强调了高张在区分亚组中的关键作用。
这些发现为PVD亚型之间的差异提供了更多证据,表明插入性性交困难可能源于黏膜和肌肉组织的不同改变。结果还强调了使用多种测试来获取不同实验诱导的疼痛测量指标的重要性,揭示了每个亚组中外阴疼痛超敏反应的独特模式。