• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降钙素原和C反应蛋白评估对成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克重症监护病房患者的预后意义:59例回顾性分析

Prognostic significance of PCT and CRP evaluation for adult ICU patients with sepsis and septic shock: retrospective analysis of 59 cases.

作者信息

Cui Na, Zhang Hongwei, Chen Zhi, Yu Zhanbiao

机构信息

1 Department of ICU, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, P. R. China.

These authors contributed equally to this work.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2019 Apr;47(4):1573-1579. doi: 10.1177/0300060518822404. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1177/0300060518822404
PMID:30656987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6460616/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with sepsis and those with septic shock.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients were divided into sepsis and septic shock groups, as well as survivor and non-survivor groups, according to the severity of the disease and patient survival. Serum PCT and CRP measurements at the time of hospitalization in the intensive care unit were examined.

RESULTS

On the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th days, the CRP level was higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group, and the serum CRP level was higher in patients in the septic shock group than in patients in the sepsis group. Regarding changes in serum PCT level in each group, the levels of PCT were significantly different between non-survivor and survivor groups, whereas they did not differ between patients in the sepsis and septic shock groups. Serum PCT kinetics (ΔPCT) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum PCT and CRP have good clinical diagnostic and prognostic value for patients with sepsis and septic shock. Kinetic studies of PCT and CRP can improve sensitivity and accuracy when evaluating the prognosis of patients with sepsis and those with septic shock.

摘要

目的

探讨血清降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)在脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者中的预后意义。

方法

根据疾病严重程度和患者生存情况,将59例患者分为脓毒症组和脓毒性休克组,以及生存组和非生存组。检测重症监护病房住院时的血清PCT和CRP水平。

结果

在第2、3和5天,非生存组的CRP水平高于生存组,脓毒性休克组患者的血清CRP水平高于脓毒症组患者。关于每组血清PCT水平的变化,非生存组和生存组之间的PCT水平有显著差异,而脓毒症组和脓毒性休克组患者之间的PCT水平无差异。各组间血清PCT动力学(ΔPCT)相似。

结论

血清PCT和CRP对脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者具有良好的临床诊断和预后价值。PCT和CRP的动力学研究在评估脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者的预后时可提高敏感性和准确性。

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of PCT and CRP evaluation for adult ICU patients with sepsis and septic shock: retrospective analysis of 59 cases.降钙素原和C反应蛋白评估对成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克重症监护病房患者的预后意义:59例回顾性分析
J Int Med Res. 2019 Apr;47(4):1573-1579. doi: 10.1177/0300060518822404. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
The usefulness of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to predict prognosis in septic shock patients: A multicenter prospective registry-based observational study.C 反应蛋白和降钙素原在预测脓毒性休克患者预后中的作用:一项基于多中心前瞻性登记的观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 29;9(1):6579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42972-7.
3
Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults.白细胞介素-6 比降钙素原和 C 反应蛋白更能预测抗生素治疗的成功吗?一项重症成人患者的单中心研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2.
4
Diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6, pentraxin 3, and procalcitonin levels among sepsis and septic shock patients: a prospective controlled study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions.白细胞介素-6、五聚素 3 和降钙素原水平在脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者中的诊断和预后价值:根据 Sepsis-3 定义的前瞻性对照研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4618-7.
5
[The predictor value of peripheral blood procalcitonin levels in the evaluation of prognosis of patients with septic shock].[外周血降钙素原水平在脓毒性休克患者预后评估中的预测价值]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Aug;24(8):470-3.
6
Comparison of procalcitonin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock in the oldest old patients.降钙素原与高敏C反应蛋白在高龄患者脓毒症和脓毒性休克诊断中的比较
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0566-5.
7
Diagnostic and prognostic utility of soluble CD 14 subtype (presepsin) for severe sepsis and septic shock during the first week of intensive care treatment.可溶性CD14亚型(前降钙素)在重症监护治疗第一周对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的诊断及预后评估价值
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 5;18(5):507. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0507-z.
8
[Prognostic value of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein combined with sequential organ failure assessment score in elderly patients with sepsis induced by pulmonary infection].降钙素原与C反应蛋白联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分在老年肺部感染所致脓毒症患者中的预后价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):562-565. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.008.
9
The value of sepsis biomarkers and their kinetics in the prognosis of septic shock due to bacterial infections.细菌感染所致脓毒性休克中脓毒症生物标志物及其动力学的预后价值。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(4):312-318. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.108624.
10
[Prognostic value of lipopolysaccharide binding protein and procalcitonin in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to intensive care].[脂多糖结合蛋白和降钙素原在入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者中的预后价值]
Med Intensiva. 2015 May;39(4):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prognostic Utility of Pathophysiologically Distinct Biomarkers for Renal Outcomes in Sepsis: A Prospective ICU Cohort Study.脓毒症中病理生理特征不同的生物标志物对肾脏预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性重症监护病房队列研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 30;14(15):5370. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155370.
2
Study of the Role of C-reactive Protein/Procalcitonin Ratio as a Prognostic Tool in ICU Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.C反应蛋白/降钙素原比值作为脓毒症重症监护病房患者预后评估工具的作用研究:一项前瞻性观察研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec;28(12):1130-1138. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24855. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
3
Prognostic indicators and outcome in patients with acute liver failure, sepsis and with and without shock: a retrospective cohort study.急性肝衰竭、脓毒症伴或不伴休克患者的预后指标及结局:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2438833. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2438833. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
Identification of cuproptosis-related genes in septic shock based on bioinformatic analysis.基于生物信息学分析的脓毒症休克中铜死亡相关基因的鉴定
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0315219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315219. eCollection 2024.
5
Systemic immune-inflammation index values are associated with non-melanoma skin cancers: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-2018.全身免疫炎症指数值与非黑色素瘤皮肤癌相关:来自2010 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查的证据。
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Aug 19;20(4):1128-1137. doi: 10.5114/aoms/177345. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of Trends of Procalcitonin and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients of Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房脓毒症患者降钙素原与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值变化趋势的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):942-951. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24804. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
The predictive value of peripheral blood cell mitochondrial gene expression in identifying the prognosis in pediatric sepsis at preschool age.外周血细胞线粒体基因表达在学龄前儿童脓毒症预后判断中的预测价值
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jul 24;14:1413103. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1413103. eCollection 2024.
8
Review of the Predictive Value of Biomarkers in Sepsis Mortality.脓毒症死亡率生物标志物预测价值综述
Emerg Med Int. 2024 Jun 5;2024:2715606. doi: 10.1155/2024/2715606. eCollection 2024.
9
Clinical predictive value of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index for prognosis of critically ill patients with sepsis in intensive care unit: a retrospective single-center observational study.基于 CRP-白蛋白-淋巴细胞指数对 ICU 脓毒症危重症患者预后的临床预测价值:一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1395134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395134. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers in Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis Patients.培养阳性与培养阴性脓毒症患者的临床特征及生物标志物比较
Cureus. 2024 Apr 21;16(4):e58682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58682. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist as a biomarker of sepsis in neutropenic haematological patients.白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂作为中性粒细胞减少血液学患者脓毒症的生物标志物
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Aug 12. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13161.
2
Elevated serum S-100β in patients with septic shock is associated with delirium.血清 S-100β 水平升高与感染性休克患者的谵妄有关。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Jan;63(1):69-73. doi: 10.1111/aas.13228. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
3
Diagnostic and prognostic value of procalcitonin in patients with sepsis.降钙素原在脓毒症患者中的诊断和预后价值
Med Glas (Zenica). 2018 Aug 1;15(2):93-100. doi: 10.17392/963-18.
4
[Value of Hepcidin as a diagnostic biomarker of sepsis in critically ill adults].[铁调素作为危重症成年患者脓毒症诊断生物标志物的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jul;30(7):652-657. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.07.007.
5
Research on the diagnostic effect of PCT level in serum on patients with sepsis due to different pathogenic causes.探讨不同病因所致脓毒症患者血清 PCT 水平的诊断效果。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(13):4238-4242. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15418.
6
Diagnostic value of decoy receptor 3 combined with procalcitonin and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor for sepsis.诱饵受体 3 联合降钙素原和可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体对脓毒症的诊断价值。
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2018 May 9;23:22. doi: 10.1186/s11658-018-0087-z. eCollection 2018.
7
Clinical significance of the detection of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中降钙素原和C反应蛋白检测的临床意义
Exp Ther Med. 2018 May;15(5):4265-4270. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5960. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
How should procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels be interpreted in haemodialysis patients?在血液透析患者中,应该如何解读降钙素原和C反应蛋白水平?
Intern Med J. 2018 Oct;48(10):1222-1228. doi: 10.1111/imj.13952.
9
Removal of Procalcitonin and Selected Cytokines during Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis Using High Cutoff Hemofilters in Patients with Sepsis and Acute Kidney Injury.在脓毒症和急性肾损伤患者中使用高通量血液滤过器进行连续静脉-静脉血液透析时降钙素原和选定细胞因子的清除。
Blood Purif. 2018;46(2):153-159. doi: 10.1159/000488929. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
10
[Predictive value of inflammatory markers for acute kidney injury in sepsis patients: analysis of 753 cases in 7 years].[炎症标志物对脓毒症患者急性肾损伤的预测价值:7年753例病例分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Apr;30(4):346-350. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.04.012.