• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电话健康调查估计:无应答和样本限制的影响。

Telephone health survey estimates: Effects of nonresponse and sample limitations.

机构信息

Center for Survey Research, UMass Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Applied Statistics and Operations Research, Bowling Green University, Bowling Green, Ohio.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):700-706. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13110. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13110
PMID:30657170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6505407/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess nonresponse error in telephone health survey data based on an address-based sample.

DATA SOURCES

Telephone and in-person interviews in Greater Boston.

STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: Interviewers attempted telephone interviews at addresses that were matched to telephone numbers using questions drawn from federal health surveys. In-person household interviews were carried out with telephone nonrespondents and at addresses without matching telephone numbers.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

After adjusting for demographic differences, only eight of 15 estimates based on the telephone interviews lay within two standard errors of the estimates when data from all three groups were included.

CONCLUSIONS

For health surveys of address-based samples, many estimates based on telephone respondents differ from the total population in ways that cannot be corrected with simple demographic adjustments.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估基于地址抽样的电话健康调查数据中的无应答误差。

数据来源

大波士顿地区的电话和入户访谈。

研究设计/数据收集:访员使用从联邦健康调查中抽取的问题,根据电话号码匹配地址,尝试进行电话访谈。对于电话未应答者和无匹配电话号码的地址,进行入户家庭访谈。

主要发现

在调整人口统计学差异后,当纳入所有三组数据时,只有 15 个估计值中的 8 个基于电话访谈的估计值在两个标准误差范围内。

结论

对于基于地址抽样的健康调查,许多基于电话应答者的估计值与总人口存在差异,无法通过简单的人口统计学调整来纠正。

相似文献

1
Telephone health survey estimates: Effects of nonresponse and sample limitations.电话健康调查估计:无应答和样本限制的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):700-706. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13110. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members.采用电话访谈以减少健康计划成员邮件调查中的无应答偏倚。
Med Care. 2002 Mar;40(3):190-200. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200203000-00003.
3
Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys.邮件和电话调查中的无应答偏差以及早期应答者与所有应答者的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Aug;120(2):291-301. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113892.
4
A comparison of responses to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey.混合模式健康调查中邮寄问卷与电话访谈的应答比较
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov;126(5):962-71. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114734.
5
Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys.健康调查中的面对面家庭访谈与电话访谈
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Apr;21(2):134-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01672.x.
6
Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013.澳大利亚利用电话人口调查的慢性病和风险因素监测系统所获健康评估的偏差:2010年至2013年澳大利亚一项代表性面对面调查的结果
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Apr 18;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0145-z.
7
Telephone surveys in public health research.公共卫生研究中的电话调查。
Med Care. 1986 Feb;24(2):97-112. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198602000-00002.
8
Survey research with a random digit dial national mobile phone sample in Ghana: Methods and sample quality.在加纳使用随机数字拨号全国手机样本进行的调查研究:方法与样本质量。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0190902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190902. eCollection 2018.
9
Quantifying bias in a health survey: modeling total survey error in the national immunization survey.量化健康调查中的偏差:国家免疫调查中总调查误差的建模。
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 28;30(5):505-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.3911. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
10
Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys.用于家庭药物使用调查的电话访谈与面对面访谈
Int J Addict. 1992 Jan;27(1):71-91. doi: 10.3109/10826089109063463.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring barriers to IVR surveys and the effectiveness of human follow-up calls: insights from a mixed methods study in Uganda.探索交互式语音应答(IVR)调查的障碍以及人工跟进电话的有效性:来自乌干达一项混合方法研究的见解
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2025 Aug 16;3:oqaf017. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqaf017. eCollection 2025.
2
Trend analyses and comparison of characteristics of current-, former- and never-drinkers among young adults in France from 2000 to 2021.2000年至2021年法国年轻人中当前饮酒者、既往饮酒者和从不饮酒者特征的趋势分析与比较。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22405-z.
3
Will patient data collection methods change after a pandemic? A systematic review of the strengths, challenges and opportunities of this new scenario.疫情大流行后患者数据收集方法会改变吗?对这种新情况的优势、挑战和机遇的系统综述。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 13;35(1):113. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04223-6.
4
Disparities in Influenza, Pneumococcal, COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in High-Risk Adults Aged 19 to 64 Years in Southeastern Minnesota, 2010-2021.明尼苏达州东南部 19 至 64 岁高危成年人中流感、肺炎球菌和 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的差异,2010-2021 年。
Chest. 2024 Jul;166(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.049. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
5
Follow-up Rates After Teleretinal Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: Assessing Patient Barriers to Care.糖尿病视网膜病变远程视网膜筛查后的随访率:评估患者的护理障碍
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023 Feb 21;7(2):125-131. doi: 10.1177/24741264221147103. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
6
Evolution of Clinical Complexity, Treatment Burden, Health Care Use, and Diabetes-Related Outcomes Among Commercial and Medicare Advantage Plan Beneficiaries With Diabetes in the U.S., 2006-2018.美国商业保险和医疗保险优势计划糖尿病患者临床复杂性、治疗负担、医疗保健使用和糖尿病相关结局的演变:2006-2018 年。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2299-2308. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2623.
7
Factors influencing inappropriate use of antibiotics: Findings from a nationwide survey of the general public in Malaysia.影响抗生素不合理使用的因素:来自马来西亚全国公众调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0258698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258698. eCollection 2021.
8
Leading Factors for Weight Gain during COVID-19 Lockdown in a Spanish Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.新冠肺炎封锁期间西班牙人群体重增加的主要因素:一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Mar 10;13(3):894. doi: 10.3390/nu13030894.
9
Factors Accounting for Obesity and Its Perception among the Adult Spanish Population: Data from 1,000 Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews.影响西班牙成年人肥胖及其认知的因素:1000 次计算机辅助电话访谈数据。
Obes Facts. 2020;13(4):322-332. doi: 10.1159/000508111. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.减少全国电话调查中的无回应率的后果。
Public Opin Q. 2000 Summer;64(2):125-48. doi: 10.1086/317759.