Begnaud Abbie L, Joseph Anne M, Lindgren Bruce R
All authors: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-6. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00033.
Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography is endorsed by the US Preventive Services Task Force, but many eligible patients have yet to be offered screening. Major barriers to the implementation of screening are physician and system related-the requirement for a detailed smoking history, including pack-years, to determine eligibility. We conducted this pilot to determine the feasibility of lung cancer screening (LCS) promotion that would offer screening to eligible persons and patient completion of smoking history to estimate the size of the population of former smokers who may be eligible for LCS in a single health care system.
Two hundred participants were randomly selected from former smokers who were seen at the University of Minnesota Health in the past 2 years and assigned to control (usual care) and electronic promotion, stratified by age. Electronic messages to promote LCS were sent to an intervention group, including a link to complete a detailed smoking history in the electronic health record.
Of 99 participants, 66 (67%) in the intervention group read the message, 24 (36%) of 66 responded, and 19 (79%) of 24 respondents completed the smoking history. Ten intervention participants and 13 usual care participants were eligible for screening on the basis of pack-year history. Four eligible participants underwent screening in the intervention group compared with one participant in the usual care group.
Electronic promotion may help identify patients who are eligible for LCS but will not reliably reach all patients because of low response rates. In this sample of former smokers, the majority are ineligible for LCS on the basis of pack-year history. Electronic methods can improve documentation of smoking history.
美国预防服务工作组认可使用低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌,但许多符合条件的患者尚未接受筛查。筛查实施的主要障碍与医生和系统相关,即需要详细的吸烟史(包括吸烟包年数)来确定是否符合条件。我们开展了这项试点研究,以确定肺癌筛查(LCS)推广的可行性,该推广将为符合条件的人提供筛查,并让患者完成吸烟史记录,以估计在单一医疗系统中可能符合LCS条件的既往吸烟者群体的规模。
从明尼苏达大学健康中心在过去2年中就诊的既往吸烟者中随机选取200名参与者,按年龄分层后分为对照组(常规护理)和电子推广组。向干预组发送促进LCS的电子信息,包括在电子健康记录中完成详细吸烟史的链接。
在99名参与者中,干预组有66名(67%)阅读了信息,66名中有24名(36%)做出回应,24名回应者中有19名(79%)完成了吸烟史记录。根据吸烟包年数,10名干预组参与者和13名常规护理组参与者符合筛查条件。干预组有4名符合条件的参与者接受了筛查,而常规护理组只有1名。
电子推广可能有助于识别符合LCS条件的患者,但由于回应率低,无法确保覆盖所有患者。在这个既往吸烟者样本中,大多数人根据吸烟包年数不符合LCS条件。电子方法可以改善吸烟史的记录。