Wang Chenyang, Wainberg Zev A, Raldow Ann, Lee Percy
All authors: University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-9. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00099.
Studies have shown an increased risk for all-cause mortality with right-sided colon cancer (RCC) as compared with left-sided colon cancer (LCC). However, these studies were unable to directly account for mortality events unrelated to cancer, known as other-cause mortality. We investigated the difference in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) between RCC and LCC at localized, regional, and metastatic stages, according to the Fine and Gray proportional hazards model, while accounting for other-cause mortality as a competing risk.
Using the SEER database, we identified 90,635 patients with LCC (ie, involving the splenic flexure, descending, sigmoid, and rectosigmoid colon) and 112,679 patients with RCC (ie, involving the cecum, ascending, hepatic flexure, and transverse colon) diagnosed from 1998 to 2013. We performed a competing risk analysis for CSM using the Fine and Gray proportional hazard model, adjusting for age, sex, race, tumor grade, surgery status, year of diagnosis, and tumor laterality, with two-sided testing and a statistical significance threshold of 0.05.
Compared with LCC, RCC demonstrated statistically significant decreased CSM at the localized stage (adjusted hazards ratio [AHR], 0.865; P < .001), equivalent CSM at the regional stage (AHR, 0.990; P = .440), and increased CSM at the metastatic stage (AHR, 1.175; P < .001).
Using a competing risk model, we have shown that RCC, compared with LCC, is associated with lower CSM at the localized stage, equivalent CSM at the regional stage, and higher CSM at the metastatic stage. This pattern may correlate with variation in genetic factors, including known decreased prevalence of microsatellite instability in RCC with regional and metastatic disease.
研究表明,与左侧结肠癌(LCC)相比,右侧结肠癌(RCC)的全因死亡率风险增加。然而,这些研究无法直接解释与癌症无关的死亡事件,即其他原因导致的死亡率。我们根据Fine和Gray比例风险模型,在将其他原因导致的死亡率作为竞争风险进行考量的情况下,研究了局限性、区域性和转移性阶段RCC和LCC之间的癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)差异。
利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,我们确定了1998年至2013年期间诊断出的90635例LCC患者(即累及脾曲、降结肠、乙状结肠和直肠乙状结肠)和112679例RCC患者(即累及盲肠、升结肠、肝曲和横结肠)。我们使用Fine和Gray比例风险模型对CSM进行竞争风险分析,调整年龄、性别、种族、肿瘤分级、手术状态、诊断年份和肿瘤位置,采用双侧检验,统计显著性阈值为0.05。
与LCC相比,RCC在局限性阶段显示出CSM显著降低(调整后风险比[AHR],0.865;P <.001),在区域性阶段CSM相当(AHR,0.990;P = 0.440),在转移性阶段CSM增加(AHR,1.175;P <.001)。
使用竞争风险模型,我们发现与LCC相比,RCC在局限性阶段与较低CSM相关,在区域性阶段CSM相当,在转移性阶段CSM较高。这种模式可能与遗传因素的差异相关,包括已知RCC中微卫星不稳定性在区域性和转移性疾病中的患病率降低。