Islam Hashim, Edgett Brittany A, Bonafiglia Jacob T, Shulman Talya, Ma Andrew, Quadrilatero Joe, Simpson Craig A, Gurd Brendon J
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
IMPART Team Canada Investigator Network, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Exp Physiol. 2019 Mar;104(3):407-420. doi: 10.1113/EP087401. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
What is the central question of this study? Are individual changes in exercise-induced mRNA expression repeatable (i.e. representative of the true response to exercise rather than random error)? What is the main finding and its importance? Exercise-induced changes in mRNA expression are not repeatable even under identical experimental conditions, thereby challenging the use of mRNA expression as a biomarker of adaptive potential and/or individual responsiveness to exercise.
It remains unknown if (1) the observed change in mRNA expression reflects an individual's true response to exercise or random (technical and/or biological) error, and (2) the individual responsiveness to exercise is protocol-specific. We examined the repeatability of skeletal muscle PGC-1α, PDK4, NRF-1, VEGF-A, HSP72 and p53 mRNA expression following two identical endurance exercise (END) bouts (END-1, END-2; 30 min of cycling at 65% of peak work rate (WR ), n = 11) and inter-individual variability in PGC-1α and PDK4 mRNA expression following END and sprint interval training (SIT; 8 × 20 s cycling intervals at ∼170% WR , n = 10) in active young males. The repeatability of key gene analysis steps (RNA extraction, reverse transcription, qPCR) and within-sample fibre-type distribution (n = 8) was also determined to examine potential sources of technical error in our analyses. Despite highly repeatable exercise bout characteristics (work rate, heart rate, blood lactate; ICC > 0.71; CV < 10%; r > 0.85, P < 0.01), gene analysis steps (ICC > 0.73; CV < 24%; r > 0.75, P < 0.01), and similar group-level changes in mRNA expression, individual changes in PGC-1α, PDK4, VEGF-A and p53 mRNA expression were not repeatable (ICC < 0.22; CV > 20%; r < 0.21). Fibre-type distribution in two portions of the same muscle biopsy was highly variable and not significantly related (ICC = 0.39; CV = 26%; r = 0.37, P = 0.37). Since individual changes in mRNA expression following identical exercise bouts were not repeatable, inferences regarding individual responsiveness to END or SIT were not made. Substantial random error exists in changes in mRNA expression following acute exercise, thereby challenging the use of mRNA expression for analysing individual responsiveness to exercise.
本研究的核心问题是什么?运动诱导的mRNA表达的个体变化是否具有可重复性(即代表对运动的真实反应而非随机误差)?主要发现及其重要性是什么?即使在相同的实验条件下,运动诱导的mRNA表达变化也不具有可重复性,这对将mRNA表达用作适应性潜力和/或个体对运动反应性的生物标志物提出了挑战。
目前尚不清楚:(1)观察到的mRNA表达变化是反映个体对运动的真实反应还是随机(技术和/或生物学)误差;(2)个体对运动的反应是否具有方案特异性。我们研究了11名活跃年轻男性在两次相同的耐力运动(END)(END-1、END-2;以峰值工作率(WR)的65%进行30分钟骑行)后,骨骼肌PGC-1α、PDK4、NRF-1、VEGF-A、HSP72和p53 mRNA表达的可重复性,以及在END和冲刺间歇训练(SIT;以约170%WR进行8×20秒骑行间歇,n = 10)后PGC-1α和PDK4 mRNA表达的个体间变异性。还确定了关键基因分析步骤(RNA提取、逆转录、qPCR)和样本内纤维类型分布(n = 8)的可重复性,以检查我们分析中潜在的技术误差来源。尽管运动 bout 特征(工作率、心率、血乳酸;ICC>0.71;CV<10%;r>0.85,P<0.01)、基因分析步骤(ICC>0.73;CV<24%;r>0.75,P<0.01)具有高度可重复性,且mRNA表达在组水平上有类似变化,但PGC-1α、PDK4、VEGF-A和p53 mRNA表达的个体变化不具有可重复性(ICC<0.22;CV>20%;r<0.21)。同一肌肉活检的两部分中的纤维类型分布高度可变且无显著相关性(ICC = 0.39;CV = 26%;r = 0.37,P = 0.37)。由于相同运动 bout 后mRNA表达的个体变化不具有可重复性,因此未对个体对END或SIT的反应性进行推断。急性运动后mRNA表达变化中存在大量随机误差,这对使用mRNA表达分析个体对运动的反应性提出了挑战。