Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Wildlife Preservation Canada, Native Pollinator Initiative, Guelph, Canada.
J Insect Sci. 2019 Jan 1;19(1):7. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iey139.
Bumble bees are an important group of pollinating insects that are of increasing conservation concern due to relatively recent and dramatic species-specific declines. Nesting ecology can vary significantly between species, and nest site selection may be affected by many factors, including heredity, individual experience, and habitat availability. Data on bumble bee nesting ecology are inherently difficult to collect in the wild as nests are often cryptic. Artificial domiciles (nest boxes) can be a useful tool for gathering information on species-specific nesting behavior to inform conservation management of native pollinator populations. The aim of this study was to examine the use of three different domicile designs for monitoring bumble bees: aboveground, underground, and false underground, while collecting information on occupying species identity and richness to compare with sampling with traditional netting survey methods. Across Ontario, the majority of sites had at least one domicile occupied, with the aboveground installation method proving most successful whereas no false-underground domiciles were occupied. Occupied domiciles appeared to preferentially sample certain species compared to netting surveys, and rarefied species richness of both methods was similar. Given that some bumble bees did occupy artificial domiciles, and species richness relative to sample size was high, with further refinement, this method may be useful for bumble bee research and monitoring: filling in nesting ecology knowledge gaps and potentially as a conservation management tool.
大黄蜂是一种重要的传粉昆虫,由于相对较近和显著的物种特异性下降,它们越来越受到保护关注。筑巢生态学在物种之间可能有很大的差异,巢址选择可能受到许多因素的影响,包括遗传、个体经验和栖息地的可用性。由于巢穴通常是隐蔽的,因此在野外收集大黄蜂筑巢生态学的数据本质上是困难的。人工住所(巢箱)可以成为收集有关特定物种筑巢行为信息的有用工具,为保护本地传粉者种群提供信息。本研究的目的是检查三种不同的住所设计在监测大黄蜂时的使用情况:地上、地下和假地下,并收集有关占用物种身份和丰富度的信息,以便与传统的网捕调查方法进行比较。在安大略省,大多数地点至少有一个住所被占用,地上安装方法最为成功,而没有假地下住所被占用。与网捕调查相比,被占用的住所似乎优先选择某些物种进行采样,两种方法的稀有物种丰富度相似。鉴于一些大黄蜂确实占据了人工住所,并且相对于样本量的物种丰富度较高,随着进一步的改进,这种方法可能对大黄蜂的研究和监测有用:填补筑巢生态学知识的空白,并可能作为保护管理工具。