Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0249248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249248. eCollection 2021.
Bumble bees are among the most imperiled pollinators. However, habitat use, especially nest site selection, remains relatively unknown. Methods to locate nests are invaluable to better understand habitat requirements and monitor wild populations. Building on prior study findings, we report constraints and possibilities observed while training detection dogs to locate bumble bee nests. Three conservation detection dogs were initially trained to three species of bumble bee nest material, first within glass jars concealed in a row of cinder blocks, then placed in the open or partially hidden for area searches. The next intended training step was to expose the dogs to natural nests located by community science volunteers. However, significant effort (> 250 hrs), yielded only two confirmed, natural nests suitable for dog training purposes. Although the dogs did not progress past the formative training stage valuable insight was gained. Maximum observed detection distance for bumble bee nest material during initial controlled training was 15 m, which decreased significantly (< 1 m) once training progressed to buried samples and natural nests. Three main considerations around future training and usage of detection dogs were identified. First, dogs might benefit from transitional training via exposures to known natural nests, regardless of species. However, it may be too difficult for people to find natural nests for this, and prior work demonstrated the ability of dogs to generalize and find natural nests after testing to artificially-buried nest material. Second, confirming a dog's nest find, via resident bee presence, is nuanced. Third, future study design and objectives must harness strengths, and reflect limitations of detection dog surveys and search strategies, as extensively discussed in this paper. Prospective studies involving detection dogs for locating bumble bee nests would benefit from considering the drawbacks and opportunities discussed and can mitigate limitations through incorporating these considerations in their study design.
熊蜂是受威胁最严重的传粉媒介之一。然而,它们的栖息地利用情况,尤其是筑巢地点选择情况,仍然知之甚少。寻找巢穴的方法对于更好地了解栖息地需求和监测野生种群非常有价值。基于先前的研究结果,我们报告了在训练探蜂犬寻找熊蜂巢穴时观察到的限制因素和可能性。三只保护探蜂犬最初接受了三种熊蜂巢材料的训练,首先是在一排煤渣砖中隐藏在玻璃罐中的巢材料,然后将其放置在开放或部分隐藏的地方进行区域搜索。下一步的训练步骤是让这些狗接触到社区科学志愿者发现的自然巢穴。然而,尽管付出了巨大的努力(超过 250 小时),只发现了两个适合犬类训练目的的确认的自然巢穴。尽管这些狗没有超过形成性训练阶段,但我们还是获得了宝贵的洞察力。在最初的受控训练中,观察到熊蜂巢材料的最大检测距离为 15 米,一旦训练进展到埋藏样本和自然巢穴,这个距离就会显著下降(<1 米)。确定了未来训练和使用探蜂犬的三个主要考虑因素。首先,无论物种如何,通过接触已知的自然巢穴,狗可能会从过渡性训练中受益。但是,对于人们来说,找到自然巢穴可能太难了,而且之前的工作表明,狗有能力在经过人工埋藏的巢材测试后,找到自然巢穴。其次,通过居住蜜蜂的存在来确认狗的巢穴发现是很微妙的。第三,正如本文中广泛讨论的那样,未来的研究设计和目标必须利用探测犬调查和搜索策略的优势,并反映其局限性。涉及使用探测犬寻找熊蜂巢穴的前瞻性研究将受益于考虑到所讨论的缺点和机会,并通过在研究设计中纳入这些考虑因素来减轻其局限性。