Suppr超能文献

成人和老年人吸气肌的表面肌电图:一项系统评价。

Surface electromyography in inspiratory muscles in adults and elderly individuals: A systematic review.

作者信息

Dos Reis Ivanize Mariana Masselli, Ohara Daniela Gonçalves, Januário Letícia Bergamin, Basso-Vanelli Renata Pedrolongo, Oliveira Ana Beatriz, Jamami Mauricio

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos/SP, Brazil; Spirometry and Respiratory Physiotherapy Laboratory (LEFiR) at UFSCar, São Carlos/SP, Brazil.

Department of Physical Therapy, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos/SP, Brazil; Federal University of Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá/AP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Feb;44:139-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electromyography (EMG) helps to evaluate disorders and pulmonary behavior, as impairments in respiratory muscle function are associated with the development of diseases. There is a wide range of methods and protocols used to record and analyze EMG obtained from respiratory muscles, demonstrating a lack of standardization.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most common procedures used to record surface EMG (sEMG) of inspiratory muscles in adults and elderly individuals through a systematic review (primary), and to evaluate the quality of the report presented by the studies (secondary).

METHOD

Studies published from January 1995 until June 2018 were searched for in the Web of Science, PubMed, LILACS, EBSCO and Embase databases. Only studies evaluating sEMG of inspiratory muscles were included.

RESULTS

The electronic search retrieved a total of 6697 titles and 92 of them were included. A great variability on the methods applied to both recording and processing/analyzing data was found. Therefore, the synthesis of practical/clinical evidence to support immediate recommendations was impaired. In general, the descriptions presented by the studies are poor.

CONCLUSION

The most common procedures used for sEMG were identified. Methodological studies with objective comparisons were fundamental for improving standardization, given the impossibility of recommendations from this review.

摘要

引言

肌电图(EMG)有助于评估疾病和肺部行为,因为呼吸肌功能受损与疾病的发展相关。用于记录和分析从呼吸肌获得的肌电图的方法和方案多种多样,这表明缺乏标准化。

目的

通过系统评价(主要目的)确定用于记录成人和老年人吸气肌表面肌电图(sEMG)的最常见程序,并评估研究报告的质量(次要目的)。

方法

在科学网、PubMed、LILACS、EBSCO和Embase数据库中检索1995年1月至2018年6月发表的研究。仅纳入评估吸气肌sEMG的研究。

结果

电子检索共检索到6697个标题,其中92个被纳入。发现应用于记录和处理/分析数据的方法存在很大差异。因此,支持即时建议的实践/临床证据的综合受到损害。总体而言,研究给出的描述很差。

结论

确定了用于sEMG的最常见程序。鉴于本综述无法给出建议,进行客观比较的方法学研究对于提高标准化至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验