Extent and Predictors of Poor Glycaemic Control among Elderly Pakistani Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Atif Muhammad, Saleem Quratulain, Asghar Saima, Malik Iram, Ahmad Nafees

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta 87300, Pakistan.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jan 17;55(1):21. doi: 10.3390/medicina55010021.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between glycaemic control and factors that may influence this among elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Lahore, Pakistan. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Jinnah and Sir Ganga Ram Hospitals, Lahore using convenience sampling techniques between 1 December 2015 and 28 February 2016. The sample consisted of elderly (>65 years) T2DM patients. Glycaemic values and patient characteristics were obtained from medical charts. Consenting patients were interviewed to complete the Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Clinical Frailty Scale, Iowa Pain Thermometer Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool, Mini Nutritional Assessment Scale-Short Form and Self Care Inventory-Revised Version. Multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the predictors of poor glycaemic control. A total of 490 patients were approached and 400 agreed to participate. Overall, nearly one-third (32.2%, = 129) of patients had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at the target level. Fasting and random plasma glucose levels were within the target range to much the same extent; (36.8%, = 147) and (27%, = 108), respectively. HbA1c levels were also higher in patients with co-morbidities (67.4%, = 229) with diabetes-related complications (73.5%, = 227). Significant predictors of impaired glycaemic control (HbA1c) included poor diabetes self-care (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95, 0.98), not being prescribed oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) (AOR 6.22; 95% CI 2.09, 18.46), regular hypoglycaemic attacks (AOR 2.53; 95% CI 1.34, 4.81) and falling tendency (AOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.10, 0.36). Poor glycaemic control prevailed among the majority of elderly Pakistani diabetic patients in this study. Triggering factors of poor glycaemic control should be taken into consideration by the healthcare professionals in targeting multifaceted interventions to achieve good glycaemic control.

摘要

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索