Suppr超能文献

经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中持续抗凝与间断抗凝的比较,以及术后抗凝管理对房颤患者结局的影响。

Continued Versus Interrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Impact of Postoperative Anticoagulant Management on Outcome in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

Heart Center Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany.

Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;123(7):1134-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.042. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

The role of continued versus interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis is uncertain. The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the impact (1) of continued versus interrupted OAC on early safety and (2) of postoperative anticoagulant management on the 1-year mortality in patients with AF who underwent TF-TAVI. Consecutive patients with AF and on OAC at admission (n = 598) were stratified according to interrupted (iVKA) versus continued vitamin K antagonist (cVKA) versus continued direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) at the time of TF-TAVI. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 early safety was the primary outcome measure. Patients with iVKA (n = 299), cVKA (n = 117), and DOAC (n = 182) had comparable baseline characteristics including age (p = 0.25), gender (p = 0.33), and STS-Score (p = 0.072). The proportion of patients having a CHADS-VASc-Score ≥3 (p = 0.791) and HAS-BLED-Score ≥3 (p = 0.185) was not different between groups. The rate of early safety events (with lower values indicating superior safety) was lowest in DOAC (13.2%) and not increased in cVKA (19.7%) compared to iVKA (23.1%) (p = 0.029). Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 defined stroke (p = 0.527) and bleeding (p = 0.097) did not differ between groups. Renal failure occurred more often in iVKA compared to cVKA and DOAC (p = 0.02). All-cause 1-year mortality was 20.1% in iVKA, 13.7% in cVKA, and 8.8% in DOAC (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed DOAC to be associated with reduced all-cause 1-year mortality (HR 0.56 (95%-CI 0.32 to 0.99), p = 0.047) whereas cVKA was comparable to iVKA (HR 0.75 (95%-CI 0.43 to 1.31), p = 0.307). In conclusion, cVKA did not increase the rate for the composite end point of early safety at 30 days in this cohort of patients. Treatment with a DOAC was associated with a significantly reduced rate of early safety end points at 30 days and lower 1-year mortality.

摘要

在因严重主动脉瓣狭窄行经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TF-TAVI)的房颤(AF)患者中,持续或中断口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的作用尚不确定。本回顾性研究旨在评估(1)持续 OAC 与中断 OAC 对早期安全性的影响,以及(2)术后抗凝管理对 AF 患者 TF-TAVI 后 1 年死亡率的影响。连续入选因 AF 且入院时正在接受 OAC 治疗的患者(n=598),根据 TF-TAVI 时是否中断(iVKA)、持续维生素 K 拮抗剂(cVKA)或持续直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)进行分层。 Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 早期安全性是主要观察终点。iVKA 组(n=299)、cVKA 组(n=117)和 DOAC 组(n=182)的基线特征相似,包括年龄(p=0.25)、性别(p=0.33)和 STS 评分(p=0.072)。各组 CHADS-VASc 评分≥3(p=0.791)和 HAS-BLED 评分≥3(p=0.185)的患者比例无差异。早期安全性事件发生率(数值越低表明安全性越高)以 DOAC 组最低(13.2%),cVKA 组(19.7%)与 iVKA 组(23.1%)相比无增加(p=0.029)。 Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 定义的卒中(p=0.527)和出血(p=0.097)在各组间无差异。与 cVKA 和 DOAC 组相比,iVKA 组更常发生肾功能衰竭(p=0.02)。iVKA 组、cVKA 组和 DOAC 组的 1 年全因死亡率分别为 20.1%、13.7%和 8.8%(p=0.015)。多变量分析显示,DOAC 与 1 年全因死亡率降低相关(HR 0.56(95%CI 0.32 至 0.99),p=0.047),而 cVKA 与 iVKA 相比无差异(HR 0.75(95%CI 0.43 至 1.31),p=0.307)。结论,在本研究队列中,cVKA 并未增加 30 天时的早期安全性复合终点发生率。与 iVKA 相比,使用 DOAC 治疗与早期安全性终点发生率显著降低和 1 年死亡率降低相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验