Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 26;12(16):1580-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.001.
The study sought to determine the patterns of antithrombotic therapy and association with clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CHADS-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) score ≥2 following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
The impact of antithrombotic regimens on clinical outcomes in patients with AF and severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVR is unknown.
In the randomized PARTNER II (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve II) trial and associated registries, 1,621 patients with prior AF and CHADS-VASc score ≥2 comprised the study cohort. Outcomes were analyzed according to antithrombotic therapy.
During the 5-year enrollment period, 933 (57.6%) patients were discharged on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC). Uninterrupted antiplatelet therapy (APT) for at least 6 months or until an endpoint event was used in 544 of 933 (58.3%) of patients on OAC and 77.5% of patients not on OAC. At 2 years, patients on OAC had a similar rate of stroke (6.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.53) and the composite outcome of death or stroke (29.7% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.33), compared with no OAC. OAC with APT was associated with a reduced rate of stroke (5.4% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.03) and death or stroke (29.7% vs. 40.1%; p = 0.01), compared with no OAC or APT. Following adjustment, OAC with APT and APT alone were both associated with reduced rates of stroke compared with no OAC or APT (hazard ratio for OAC+APT: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.22 to 0.85; p = 0.015; hazard ratio for APT alone: 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 0.65; p = 0.002), while OAC alone was not.
Among patients with prior AF undergoing TAVR, antiplatelet with or without anticoagulant therapy was associated with a reduced risk of stroke at 2 years, implicating multifactorial stroke mechanisms in this population.
本研究旨在探讨经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后合并心房颤动(AF)和 CHADS-VASc(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄≥75 岁、糖尿病、既往卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作或血栓栓塞、血管疾病、65-74 岁、性别)评分≥2 的患者的抗栓治疗模式及其与临床结局的关系。
目前尚不清楚 AF 合并严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经 TAVR 治疗后抗栓方案对临床结局的影响。
在随机 PARTNER II(主动脉瓣经导管置换 II 期)试验及相关登记研究中,共有 1621 例既往有 AF 和 CHADS-VASc 评分≥2 的患者纳入研究队列。根据抗栓治疗情况对结局进行分析。
在 5 年入组期间,933 例(57.6%)患者出院时接受口服抗凝治疗(OAC)。933 例接受 OAC 治疗的患者中,544 例(58.3%)至少接受 6 个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)或直至出现终点事件,77.5%未接受 OAC 治疗的患者接受 DAPT。2 年时,与未接受 OAC 治疗的患者相比,接受 OAC 治疗的患者卒中发生率相似(6.6% vs. 5.6%;p=0.53),复合终点(死亡或卒中)发生率相似(29.7% vs. 31.8%;p=0.33)。与未接受 OAC 或 DAPT 治疗的患者相比,接受 OAC 联合 DAPT 治疗的患者卒中发生率较低(5.4% vs. 11.1%;p=0.03),死亡或卒中发生率较低(29.7% vs. 40.1%;p=0.01)。调整混杂因素后,与未接受 OAC 或 DAPT 治疗的患者相比,接受 OAC 联合 DAPT 或 DAPT 治疗的患者卒中发生率均较低(OAC+DAPT:风险比 0.43,95%置信区间:0.22 至 0.85;p=0.015;DAPT 单药:风险比 0.32,95%置信区间:0.16 至 0.65;p=0.002),而 OAC 单药治疗则不然。
在接受 TAVR 的既往有 AF 病史的患者中,抗血小板治疗联合或不联合抗凝治疗可降低 2 年时的卒中风险,提示该人群中存在多种卒中机制。