• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与健康相关的生活质量和焦虑在 PAN-CAN 肺癌筛查队列中。

Health-related quality of life and anxiety in the PAN-CAN lung cancer screening cohort.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Integrative Oncology, The British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024719.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024719
PMID:30659040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6340441/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT (LDCT) on participants' anxiety levels and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important consideration in the implementation of such programmes. We aimed to describe changes in anxiety and HRQoL in a high-risk Canadian cohort undergoing LDCT lung cancer screening.

METHODS

2537 subjects who had 2% or greater lung cancer risk over 6 years using a risk prediction tool were recruited from eight centres across Canada in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (2008-2010). We compared HRQoL and anxiety levels before and after screening of 1237 participants with LDCT (excluding a subset of 1300 participants who also underwent autofluorescence bronchoscopy screening), as well as after investigations performed because of a positive screening examination. The 12-item short-form Physical and Mental Component Scales (SF-12), EQ-5D-3L scores and State Trait Anxiety Inventory-State anxiety were used at each assessment.

RESULTS

Overall, there were no clinically significant differences in HRQoL outcomes between baseline and each of the survey time points following initial screening. No mean change in anxiety in the overall cohort was noted following baseline LDCT, but more participants had clinically significant increase in anxiety versus decrease after baseline screening (increase >minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (n=180) vs decrease >MCID (n=50), p<0.001). This finding persisted but to a lesser degree at the 12 month time point (increase >MCID (n=146) vs decrease >MCID (n=87), p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CT screening for lung cancer has no major overall impact on HRQoL among participants, although a minority of participants (number-needed-to-harm=7 after baseline screening and 18 at 1 year) demonstrated clinically significant increased anxiety levels.

TRIALREGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00751660; Results.

摘要

目的

肺癌筛查中使用低剂量胸部 CT(LDCT)对参与者焦虑水平和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响是实施此类计划的一个重要考虑因素。我们旨在描述在加拿大高风险队列中进行 LDCT 肺癌筛查时焦虑和 HRQoL 的变化。

方法

2008-2010 年,从加拿大 8 个中心招募了 2537 名使用风险预测工具 6 年内肺癌风险为 2%或更高的受试者,参与 Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study(PCLCS)。我们比较了 1237 名接受 LDCT 筛查(排除了另外 1300 名接受 autofluorescence bronchoscopy 筛查的参与者子集)的参与者以及因阳性筛查检查而进行的调查后,HRQoL 和焦虑水平的变化。在每次评估中,使用 12 项简短式健康调查量表物理和精神成分量表(SF-12)、EQ-5D-3L 评分和状态特质焦虑量表状态焦虑。

结果

总体而言,在初始筛查后的每个调查时间点,HRQoL 结果没有临床显著差异。在基线 LDCT 后,整个队列的焦虑没有平均变化,但与基线筛查后相比,更多的参与者焦虑程度增加(增加>最小临床重要差异(MCID)(n=180)vs 减少>MCID(n=50),p<0.001)。这一发现持续存在,但在 12 个月时程度较小(增加>MCID(n=146)vs 减少>MCID(n=87),p<0.001)。

结论

肺癌 CT 筛查对参与者的 HRQoL 没有总体重大影响,尽管少数参与者(基线筛查后为 7 人,1 年后为 18 人)表现出临床显著的焦虑水平增加。

试验注册

NCT00751660;结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/620edcb6ed81/bmjopen-2018-024719f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/501479a2369f/bmjopen-2018-024719f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/7b30393c1c5e/bmjopen-2018-024719f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/3a1673f66cdd/bmjopen-2018-024719f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/f14eb2543adf/bmjopen-2018-024719f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/4373ad875a9d/bmjopen-2018-024719f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/1b41d9f68ebe/bmjopen-2018-024719f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/9cdb283ed339/bmjopen-2018-024719f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/620edcb6ed81/bmjopen-2018-024719f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/501479a2369f/bmjopen-2018-024719f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/7b30393c1c5e/bmjopen-2018-024719f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/3a1673f66cdd/bmjopen-2018-024719f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/f14eb2543adf/bmjopen-2018-024719f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/4373ad875a9d/bmjopen-2018-024719f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/1b41d9f68ebe/bmjopen-2018-024719f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/9cdb283ed339/bmjopen-2018-024719f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5433/6340441/620edcb6ed81/bmjopen-2018-024719f08.jpg

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life and anxiety in the PAN-CAN lung cancer screening cohort.与健康相关的生活质量和焦虑在 PAN-CAN 肺癌筛查队列中。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024719.
2
Impact of lung cancer screening results on participant health-related quality of life and state anxiety in the National Lung Screening Trial.肺癌筛查结果对全国肺癌筛查试验中参与者健康相关生活质量和状态焦虑的影响。
Cancer. 2014 Nov 1;120(21):3401-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28833. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial).计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌对一项随机对照试验(NELSON试验)参与者的影响。
Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):396-404. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23590.
4
Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.采用风险模型进行肺癌筛查的研究对象选择(泛加拿大肺癌早期检测[PanCan]研究):一项单臂前瞻性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30597-1. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Low Prevalence of High-Grade Lesions Detected With Autofluorescence Bronchoscopy in the Setting of Lung Cancer Screening in the Pan-Canadian Lung Cancer Screening Study.泛加拿大肺癌筛查研究中,在肺癌筛查背景下经自发荧光支气管镜检查发现的高级别病变患病率较低。
Chest. 2016 Nov;150(5):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
6
Short-term health-related quality of life consequences in a lung cancer CT screening trial (NELSON).肺癌 CT 筛查试验(NELSON)中的短期健康相关生活质量后果。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):27-34. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605459. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
7
Long-term effects of lung cancer computed tomography screening on health-related quality of life: the NELSON trial.肺癌计算机断层扫描筛查对健康相关生活质量的长期影响:NELSON 试验。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Jul;38(1):154-61. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00123410. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
8
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).
9
Short-term psychosocial outcomes of adding a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan to the thoracic CT within lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查中增加非对比腹部 CT 扫描对短期心理社会结果的影响。
BJU Int. 2024 May;133(5):539-547. doi: 10.1111/bju.16260. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
10
Short-term impact of breast cancer screening intervention on health-related quality of life in China: A multicentre cross-sectional survey.乳腺癌筛查干预对中国健康相关生活质量的短期影响:一项多中心横断面调查。
Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1836-1844. doi: 10.1002/pon.5160. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned From International Lung Cancer Screening Trials; People at Risk Deserve Screening for Early Detection.从国际肺癌筛查试验中吸取的经验教训;高危人群值得进行筛查以实现早期发现。
Respirology. 2025 Sep;30(9):802-816. doi: 10.1111/resp.70097. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
2
Effectiveness of an eye movement desensitization and reprocessing intervention for the prevention of post- traumatic symptoms in perinatal loss: a randomized pilot controlled trial.眼动脱敏与再加工干预对预防围产期丧亲创伤后症状的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 9;16:1593306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1593306. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.采用风险模型进行肺癌筛查的研究对象选择(泛加拿大肺癌早期检测[PanCan]研究):一项单臂前瞻性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30597-1. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
The EQ-5D-5L is More Discriminative Than the EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Diabetes in Singapore.在新加坡糖尿病患者中,EQ-5D-5L比EQ-5D-3L更具区分能力。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 May;9:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial.
Exploring the psychological burden in a pancreatic cancer surveillance programme based on high-risk individuals: a Swedish cross-sectional study.
基于高危个体的胰腺癌监测项目中的心理负担探索:一项瑞典横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 30;15(4):e097814. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097814.
4
Effect of a Single Live Group Music Therapy Intervention on Anxiety-State and Well-Being Levels During Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol.单次现场团体音乐疗法干预对化疗期间焦虑状态和幸福感水平的影响:一项多中心随机临床试验方案
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024 Dec 26;13:27536130241310241. doi: 10.1177/27536130241310241. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Short-term impact of cardiovascular screening by traditional risk assessment or coronary artery calcium score on health-related quality of life: the ROBINSCA trial.传统风险评估或冠状动脉钙化评分进行心血管筛查对健康相关生活质量的短期影响:ROBINSCA试验
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 23;4(5):oeae080. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae080. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
[Current Status of Self-transcendence among Lung Cancer Patients 
and Its Influencing Factors].[肺癌患者自我超越的现状及其影响因素]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 20;27(7):523-528. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.16.
7
Participant factors associated with psychosocial impacts of lung cancer screening: A systematic review.与肺癌筛查的心理社会影响相关的参与者因素:系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(15):e70054. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70054.
8
Validation of the psychosocial consequences of screening in lung cancer questionnaire in the international lung screen trial Australian cohort.国际肺癌筛查试验澳大利亚队列中肺癌筛查问卷心理社会后果的验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jan 25;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02225-8.
9
The aggregate value of cancer screenings in the United States: full potential value and value considering adherence.美国癌症筛查的总价值:充分潜力价值和考虑依从性的价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09738-4.
10
Current and Future Perspectives on Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Roadmap From 2023 to 2027 From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.当前和未来视角下的肺癌计算机断层扫描筛查:2023 至 2027 年国际肺癌研究协会路线图
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Jan;19(1):36-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.07.019. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
低剂量CT筛查的长期社会心理结局:英国肺癌筛查随机对照试验的结果
Thorax. 2016 Nov;71(11):996-1005. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208283. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Low Prevalence of High-Grade Lesions Detected With Autofluorescence Bronchoscopy in the Setting of Lung Cancer Screening in the Pan-Canadian Lung Cancer Screening Study.泛加拿大肺癌筛查研究中,在肺癌筛查背景下经自发荧光支气管镜检查发现的高级别病变患病率较低。
Chest. 2016 Nov;150(5):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
5
Psychological Burden Associated With Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.肺癌筛查相关的心理负担:一项系统综述。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):315-324. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Statistical Challenges in the Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials.癌症临床试验中与健康相关的生活质量分析中的统计学挑战。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1953-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7974. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
7
Recommendations on screening for lung cancer.肺癌筛查建议。
CMAJ. 2016 Apr 5;188(6):425-432. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151421. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data.转换还是不转换:使用广义线性混合模型分析反应时间数据。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 7;6:1171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171. eCollection 2015.
9
Catalog and comparison of societal preferences (utilities) for lung cancer health states: results from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study.肺癌健康状态的社会偏好(效用)分类与比较:癌症护理结果研究与监测(CanCORS)研究的结果
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):371-87. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15570364. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Psychosocial consequences in the Danish randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial (DLCST).丹麦肺癌随机对照筛查试验(DLCST)中的社会心理后果。
Lung Cancer. 2015 Jan;87(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20.