University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland Rehabilitation and Orthopaedic Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Spinal Cord. 2019 Jun;57(6):471-481. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0239-7. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
Randomized dual center controlled clinical trial.
To determine and compare the cardiorespiratory impact of 3 months of aquatic and robotic therapy for individuals with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury (CMISCI).
Two rehabilitation specialty hospitals.
Thirty-one individuals with CMISCI with neurological level between C2-T12 at least 1 year post injury were randomized to either aquatic or robotic treadmill therapy for 36 sessions. Customized sessions lasted 40-45 min at 65-75% heart rate reserve intensity with peak oxygen consumption (peak VO) measured during arm ergometry at baseline and post intervention. Additional peak robotic treadmill VO assessments were obtained before and after training for participants randomized to robotic intervention.
Peak VO measured with arm ergometry was not significantly different with either aquatic intervention (8.1%, p = 0.14, n = 15) or robotic intervention (-0.7%, p = 0.31, n = 17). Peak VO measured with robotic treadmill ergometry demonstrated a statistical improvement (14.7%, p = 0.03, n = 17, two-tailed t-test) across the robotic intervention. Comparison between the two interventions demonstrated a trend favoring aquatic therapy for improving arm ergometry peak VO (ANOVA, p = 0.063).
Neither 3-month exercise interventions statistically improved arm cycle ergometry peak VO, our cardiorespiratory surrogate marker, although percent improvement was greater in the aquatic exercise condition. Robotic ergometry peak VO did improve for the robotic intervention, confirming previous work. These results suggest that either intervention may hold utility in improving cardiorespiratory fitness in CMISCI, but peak VO measurement technique appears critical in detecting effects.
DOD CDMRP SCI Research Program Clinical Trial Award SC090147, FY 2009. This study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01407354.
随机双中心对照临床试验。
确定并比较 3 个月的水上和机器人疗法对慢性运动不完全性脊髓损伤(CMISCI)患者的心肺影响。
两家康复专科医院。
31 名神经损伤水平为 C2-T12 的 CMISCI 患者,损伤后至少 1 年,随机分为水上或机器人跑步机治疗组,每组 36 次。个性化治疗持续 40-45 分钟,强度为心率储备的 65-75%,在基线和干预后通过手臂测功计测量峰值摄氧量(peak VO)。对随机接受机器人干预的参与者,在训练前后进行额外的峰值机器人跑步机 VO 评估。
手臂测功计测量的 peak VO 在水上干预(8.1%,p=0.14,n=15)或机器人干预(-0.7%,p=0.31,n=17)中均无显著差异。机器人跑步机测功计测量的 peak VO 显示出在机器人干预中存在统计学上的改善(14.7%,p=0.03,n=17,双侧 t 检验)。两种干预措施之间的比较显示,改善手臂测功计 peak VO 方面,水上治疗有趋势(ANOVA,p=0.063)。
两种 3 个月的运动干预均未显著改善手臂循环测功计 peak VO,即我们的心肺替代标志物,但水上运动条件下的改善百分比更大。机器人测功计 peak VO 确实因机器人干预而提高,这证实了之前的研究。这些结果表明,两种干预措施都可能有助于改善 CMISCI 的心肺适应性,但峰值 VO 测量技术在检测效果方面至关重要。
DOD CDMRP SCI 研究计划临床研究奖 SC090147,2009 财年。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,标识符:NCT01407354。