Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, via Amendola, 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; Specialization school of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Campi, 287, 41126 Modena, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Campi, 287, 41126 Modena, Italy.
Epidemiology Unit, AUSL of Modena, Strada Martiniana, 21, 41126 Modena, Italy; Department of Economics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, San Giobbe, Cannaregio, 873, 30121 Venice, Italy.
Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
Screening programmes have been proposed as a privileged setting for health promotion interventions. We aim to assess the associations between behavioural risk factors, chronic conditions and diseases and cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Secondly, we aim to assess whether these associations are due to underlying differences in socioeconomic characteristics. In Italy, a random sample was interviewed by the PASSI surveillance (106,000 interviews) in 2014-2016. Screening uptake adjusted for age and gender alone and for age, gender and socioeconomic characteristics (educational attainment and self-reported economic difficulties) were estimated using multivariate Poisson regression models. Screening uptake was 79%, 73% and 45% for cervical (age 25-64), breast (women aged 50-69) and colorectal cancer (both sexes age 50-69), respectively. People with low consumption of vegetables and fruits and those with insufficient physical activity had lower uptake than people with healthy behaviours (20-22% and 8-15% lower, respectively), as did those obese and diabetic compared to healthier people (7-10% and 5-8% lower, respectively). Those with high-risk drinking behaviour, self-reported driving after drinking alcohol, and former smokers had higher screening uptake (3-7%, 3-6%, and 7-14% higher, respectively). Differences in uptake decreased after adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics, but trends were unvaried. In conclusion, screening uptake is negatively associated with unfavourable behaviours and health conditions that are also risk factors for breast and colorectal cancer incidence. Socioeconomic characteristics do not fully explain these differences. Health promotion interventions targeting diet and physical activity nested in screening programmes might miss part of the at-risk population.
筛查项目被提议作为健康促进干预的一个有利环境。我们旨在评估行为风险因素、慢性疾病和疾病与宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查参与率之间的关联。其次,我们旨在评估这些关联是否归因于社会经济特征的潜在差异。在意大利,PASSI 监测(106000 次访谈)于 2014-2016 年对随机样本进行了访谈。使用多变量泊松回归模型单独调整年龄和性别以及年龄、性别和社会经济特征(教育程度和自我报告的经济困难)后,估计了筛查参与率。宫颈癌(25-64 岁)、乳腺癌(50-69 岁女性)和结直肠癌(50-69 岁男女)的筛查参与率分别为 79%、73%和 45%。蔬菜和水果摄入量低以及身体活动不足的人比行为健康的人(分别低 20-22%和 8-15%)的筛查参与率低,肥胖和糖尿病患者比健康人群(分别低 7-10%和 5-8%)的筛查参与率低。有高风险饮酒行为、自述酒后驾车和曾经吸烟的人筛查参与率更高(分别高 3-7%、3-6%和 7-14%)。调整社会经济特征后,参与率的差异有所下降,但趋势保持不变。总之,筛查参与率与不良行为和健康状况呈负相关,这些行为和健康状况也是乳腺癌和结直肠癌发病的危险因素。社会经济特征并不能完全解释这些差异。嵌套在筛查项目中的针对饮食和身体活动的健康促进干预措施可能会错过一部分高危人群。