Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt B):607-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.042.
Increasing social acceptance of sexual and gender minorities may not translate to parity in health care access and health outcomes. Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) may continue to contribute to differences in preventive health behavior including cancer screening. Our purpose was to estimate the independent effect of SOGI on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening adherence.
We used sampling weighted data from 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We defined breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening using the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. All survey data were self-reported including demographic and medical information. We calculated the prevalence of screening by sexual orientation (straight, lesbian or gay, bisexual) and gender identity (cisgender, transgender). The term "sexual and gender minorities" in our study refers to lesbian or gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Logistic regression models assessed independent effect of SOGI on screening adherence.
Prevalence of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening varied significantly by SOGI. After adjusting for other variables, bisexual persons had significantly lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38-0.93) of breast cancer screening adherence. Lesbian or gay persons had significantly decreased likelihood (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.29-0.95) of cervical cancer screening adherence. Although rate of colorectal cancer screening adherence varied significantly by SOGI, we did not find an independent effect of SOGI and colorectal cancer screening adherence after adjusting for other variables. No independent effect of gender identity categories on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening adherence was detected. Social determinants of health, such as health care access and insurance, that disproportionately disadvantaged bisexual individuals independently influenced screening adherence.
SOGI can affect cancer screening adherence. Bisexual individuals had worse health care access and socioeconomic hardships among sexual and gender minorities. Given the independent effects of social determinants of health on cancer screening adherence, more attention needs to be paid to sexual and gender minorities, especially bisexual population.
增加社会对性少数群体和性别少数群体的接受度可能不会转化为获得医疗保健和健康结果方面的平等。性取向和性别认同(SOGI)可能继续导致预防保健行为的差异,包括癌症筛查。我们的目的是估计 SOGI 对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查依从性的独立影响。
我们使用了 2016 年行为风险因素监测系统的抽样加权数据。我们使用美国预防服务工作组的指南来定义乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。所有调查数据均为自我报告,包括人口统计学和医疗信息。我们根据性取向(异性恋、同性恋或双性恋)和性别认同(顺性别、跨性别)计算了筛查的患病率。在我们的研究中,“性和性别少数群体”一词是指同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者。逻辑回归模型评估了 SOGI 对筛查依从性的独立影响。
SOGI 对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的患病率有显著影响。在调整了其他变量后,双性恋者的乳腺癌筛查依从性显著降低(比值比[OR] = 0.60,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.38-0.93)。同性恋或双性恋者的宫颈癌筛查依从性显著降低(OR = 0.53,95%CI = 0.29-0.95)。虽然 SOGI 对结直肠癌筛查的依从率有显著影响,但在调整了其他变量后,我们没有发现 SOGI 与结直肠癌筛查的依从性有独立关系。性身份类别对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的依从性没有独立影响。健康保健的可及性和保险等社会决定因素对双性恋者造成了不成比例的不利影响,这些因素独立影响了筛查的依从性。
SOGI 会影响癌症筛查的依从性。双性恋者在性少数群体中面临更差的医疗保健可及性和社会经济困难。鉴于社会决定因素对癌症筛查的依从性有独立影响,需要更多地关注性少数群体,特别是双性恋群体。