Barolin G S
Neurologische Abteilung, Landes-Nervenkrankenhaus Valduna, Rankweil.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1988 Dec 31;138(23-24):584-90.
Acute and increasing headaches after traumatism may be a signal for important complications, namely: subarachnoid hemorrhage, infections from the sinus, subdural hematoma. In chronic posttraumatic headaches we do not see one single clear cut entity of "posttraumatism". The trauma acts mainly (pathophysiologically) via vasolability and via cervical spine. The important role of cervical spine for posttraumatic headaches is greatly underestimated, especially if the cranial trauma is looked at isolated, just by valuing X-rays and duration of unconsciousness. If we look at traumatism as a triggering respectively modifying factor it makes clear that we can not postulate an everlasting causation of headache by traumatism, but have to see posttraumatic headache in a fluent transition from trauma-etiology to a constitionally caused personality-etiology. Difficulties arise in giving a clear cut limit between the two causations. A time span of about two years is a ruff measure. Our multidimensional concept of headache etiology demands a clear analysis of the different factors. On the basis of this we can build up a polypragmatic way of therapy that acts as specific and complex as possible. This creates higher efficacy.
创伤后急性且逐渐加重的头痛可能是重要并发症的信号,即:蛛网膜下腔出血、鼻窦感染、硬膜下血肿。在慢性创伤后头痛中,我们看不到单一明确的“创伤后”实体。创伤主要通过血管舒缩性和颈椎(在病理生理方面)起作用。颈椎在创伤后头痛中的重要作用被大大低估了,尤其是在仅通过评估X射线和昏迷持续时间孤立地看待颅脑创伤时。如果我们将创伤视为一个触发或改变因素,就会清楚地认识到我们不能假定创伤会导致永久性头痛,而必须将创伤后头痛视为从创伤病因到体质性人格病因的流畅过渡。在明确区分这两种病因之间的界限时会出现困难。大约两年的时间跨度是一个粗略的衡量标准。我们对头痛病因的多维概念要求对不同因素进行清晰分析。在此基础上,我们可以建立一种尽可能具体和复杂的综合治疗方法。这将产生更高的疗效。