Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK; Alliance for Research in Exericse, Nutrition & Activity (ARENA) and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Apr;27(4):659-666. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
To investigate the demographic, symptomatic, clinical and structural foot characteristics associated with potential phenotypes of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA).
Cross-sectional study of 533 community-dwelling adults aged ≥50 years with foot pain in the past year. Health questionnaires and clinical assessments of symptoms, foot structure and function were undertaken. Potential midfoot OA phenotypes were defined by the pattern of radiographic joint involvement affecting either the medial midfoot (talonavicular, navicular-1 cuneiform, or cuneiform-1 metatarsal joint), central midfoot (2 cuneiform-metatarsal joint), or both medial and central midfoot joints. Multivariable regression models with generalised estimating equations were used to investigate the associations between patterns of midfoot joint involvement and symptomatic, clinical and structural characteristics compared to those with no or minimal midfoot OA.
Of 879 eligible feet, 168 had medial midfoot OA, 103 central midfoot OA, 76 both medial and central midfoot OA and 532 no/minimal OA. Having both medial and central midfoot OA was associated with higher pain scores, dorsally-located midfoot pain (OR 2.54, 95%CI 1.45, 4.45), hallux valgus (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.02, 3.05), flatter foot posture (β 0.44, 95%CI 0.12, 0.77), lower medial arch height (β 0.02, 95%CI 0.01, 0.03) and less subtalar inversion and 1 MTPJ dorsiflexion. Isolated medial midfoot OA and central midfoot OA had few distinguishing clinical characteristics.
Distinct phenotypes of midfoot OA appear challenging to identify, with substantial overlap in symptoms and clinical characteristics. Phenotypic differences in symptoms, foot posture and function were apparent in this study only when both the medial and central midfoot were involved.
研究与中足骨关节炎(OA)潜在表型相关的人口统计学、症状学、临床和足部结构特征。
对 533 名年龄≥50 岁、过去一年足部疼痛的社区居民进行横断面研究。进行健康问卷调查和症状、足部结构和功能的临床评估。潜在的中足 OA 表型通过影响内侧中足(距跟、跟舟或舟楔 1 跖骨关节)、中央中足(2 楔骨-跖骨关节)或两者的内侧和中央中足关节的放射影像学关节受累模式来定义。使用广义估计方程的多变量回归模型来研究与无或最小中足 OA 相比,中足关节受累模式与症状、临床和结构特征之间的关联。
在 879 只符合条件的足部中,168 只患有内侧中足 OA,103 只患有中央中足 OA,76 只患有内侧和中央中足 OA,532 只患有无/最小中足 OA。同时患有内侧和中央中足 OA 与更高的疼痛评分、中足背侧疼痛(OR 2.54,95%CI 1.45,4.45)、踇外翻(OR 1.76,95%CI 1.02,3.05)、足弓平坦(β 0.44,95%CI 0.12,0.77)、内侧足弓高度降低(β 0.02,95%CI 0.01,0.03)和较少的距下关节内翻和 1 MTPJ 背屈有关。孤立性内侧中足 OA 和中央中足 OA 几乎没有明显的临床特征。
中足 OA 的不同表型似乎难以识别,症状和临床特征有很大的重叠。只有当内侧和中央中足都受累时,本研究才会出现症状、足弓和功能方面的表型差异。