Lithgow Merridy J, Maharaj Jayishni N, Buldt Andrew K, Munteanu Shannon E, Mentiplay Benjamin F, Menz Hylton B
Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70054. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70054.
Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) affects one in eight people over 50, yet its impact on foot and lower limb kinematics remains poorly understood. This study compared foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA.
Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last 4 weeks and radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints. Cases aged ≥ 45 years were matched 1:1 for sex and age (± 5 years) to controls. A 10-camera motion analysis system was used to capture foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing, which were analysed with a validated multi-segmental lower limb model. Group differences were analysed using independent samples t-tests and effect sizes for discrete angles, whereas statistical parametric mapping compared kinematic patterns between groups.
We included 24 midfoot OA cases (mean age 64.4, SD 9.5) matched to 24 controls (mean age 65.2, SD 10.1). During level walking, people with midfoot OA walked slower and displayed absolute joint angles that showed less hip extension throughout stance, less knee flexion in early and late stance, less ankle dorsiflexion throughout stance (medium to large effects), greater subtalar pronation in late stance, and greater tarsometatarsal supination during early stance (medium effects). There were few differences during stair ascent and descent.
People with midfoot OA walk slower and demonstrate medium to large differences in sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle kinematics, and medium differences in subtalar and tarsometatarsal kinematics. These findings offer insights into the walking patterns of people with midfoot OA and the mechanisms that may contribute to or result from the condition. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the temporal relationship between these factors and midfoot OA development.
中足骨关节炎(OA)在50岁以上人群中的发病率为八分之一,但人们对其对足部和下肢运动学的影响仍知之甚少。本研究比较了有症状的影像学中足OA患者和无该疾病患者在平地上行走和上下楼梯时的足部和下肢运动学特征。
有症状的影像学中足OA定义为在过去4周内出现中足疼痛且在一个或多个中足关节存在影像学OA。年龄≥45岁的病例按性别和年龄(±5岁)与对照组1:1匹配。使用10台摄像机的运动分析系统在平地上行走和上下楼梯时捕捉足部和下肢运动学特征,并使用经过验证的多节段下肢模型进行分析。使用独立样本t检验分析组间差异,并计算离散角度的效应量,而统计参数映射比较组间运动学模式。
我们纳入了24例中足OA病例(平均年龄64.4岁,标准差9.5),与24例对照组(平均年龄65.2岁,标准差10.1)匹配。在平地上行走时,中足OA患者行走速度较慢,在整个站立期显示出较小的髋关节伸展绝对角度、在站立前期和后期较小的膝关节屈曲角度、在整个站立期较小的踝关节背屈角度(中等到较大效应)、在站立后期较大的距下关节内旋角度以及在站立前期较大的跗跖关节旋前角度(中等效应)。在上下楼梯过程中差异较少。
中足OA患者行走速度较慢,在矢状面髋关节、膝关节和踝关节运动学上表现出中等到较大差异,在距下关节和跗跖关节运动学上表现出中等差异。这些发现有助于深入了解中足OA患者的行走模式以及可能导致该疾病或由该疾病导致的机制。需要进行前瞻性研究以阐明这些因素与中足OA发展之间的时间关系。