Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Water Res. 2019 Apr 1;152:61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.053. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Conditioning can drastically improve the dewaterability of sewage sludge and thus it is widely practiced in most wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). In WWTPs, various antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) present in sewage are concentrated in the sewage sludge, but the effect of sludge conditioning on ARGs in sewage sludge remains unclear. Here, we evaluated and compared the effectiveness of four sludge conditioning methods (namely chemical conditioning with polyacrylamide (PAM), chemical conditioning with Fe[III]/CaO, bioleaching conditioning, and chemical acidification conditioning) and an aerobic incubation control in removing 46 target ARGs and intI1 from a municipal sewage sludge. The damage of sludge microbial cells and the change in the sludge bacterial community during the various sludge conditioning treatments were also characterized. The results suggested that the chemical conditioning with PAM and aerobic incubation treatment did not remove ARGs and intI1 from the sewage sludge. The chemical acidification reduced the absolute abundances of most ARGs and intI1, but increased their relative abundances. However, the chemical conditioning with Fe[III]/CaO and bioleaching conditioning reduced both the absolute and relative abundances of most ARGs and removed a majority of extracellular ARGs in the sludge. During sludge conditioning treatments, the sludge microbial cells were severely damaged to decrease the total bacterial biomass in sludge, and accordingly the bacterial hosts carrying ARGs and intI were effectively damaged to reduce the absolute abundances of most ARGs and intI1. In addition, the sludge bacterial community in conditioned sludge determined the relative abundances of residual ARGs. Our findings suggest that sludge conditioning can be an important sludge treatment process in attenuating antibiotic resistance in sewage sludge, and bioleaching and chemical conditioning with Fe[III]/CaO can be employed as effective conditioning ways to reduce ARGs in sewage sludge, potentially limiting their release to the environment.
调理可以显著改善污水污泥的脱水性能,因此它在大多数污水处理厂(WWTP)中得到广泛应用。在 WWTP 中,污水中存在的各种抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)集中在污水污泥中,但污泥调理对污水污泥中 ARGs 的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们评估并比较了四种污泥调理方法(即聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)化学调理、Fe[III]/CaO 化学调理、生物浸出调理和化学酸化调理)和有氧孵育对照在去除城市污水污泥中的 46 个目标 ARGs 和 intI1 的效果。还研究了在各种污泥调理处理过程中污泥微生物细胞的损伤以及污泥细菌群落的变化。结果表明,PAM 化学调理和有氧孵育处理都没有从污水污泥中去除 ARGs 和 intI1。化学酸化降低了大多数 ARGs 和 intI1 的绝对丰度,但增加了它们的相对丰度。然而,Fe[III]/CaO 化学调理和生物浸出调理降低了大多数 ARGs 和 intI1 的绝对和相对丰度,并去除了污泥中大部分的胞外 ARGs。在污泥调理处理过程中,污泥微生物细胞受到严重破坏,降低了污泥中的总细菌生物量,从而有效地破坏了携带 ARGs 和 intI 的细菌宿主,降低了大多数 ARGs 和 intI1 的绝对丰度。此外,调理污泥中的污泥细菌群落决定了残留 ARGs 的相对丰度。我们的研究结果表明,污泥调理可以是一种重要的污泥处理过程,可用于减轻污水污泥中的抗生素抗性,生物浸出和 Fe[III]/CaO 化学调理可以作为减少污水污泥中 ARGs 的有效调理方法,潜在地限制它们向环境的释放。