Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto; University of Toronto.
Frederick W. Thompson Anxiety Disorders Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto; University of Toronto.
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, less is known about how obsessions and compulsions change during treatment, either in tandem, sequentially, or independently. The current study used latent difference score analysis to show path-analytic dynamic modeling of OCD symptom change during CBT. Four competing models of the temporal relationship between obsessions and compulsions were examined: no coupling (obsessions and compulsions are not dynamically related), goal directed (obsessions lead to subsequent changes in compulsions), habit driven (compulsions lead to subsequent changes in obsessions), and reciprocal. Treatment seeking participants (N = 84) with a principal diagnosis of OCD completed 12 weeks of CBT group therapy and completed measures assessing obsession and compulsion severity at pretreatment, Sessions 4 and 8, and end of treatment. Bivariate results supported the goal directed traditional CBT model, where obsession scores are temporally associated with subsequent changes in compulsion scores. These results have implications for theoretical and treatment modelling of obsessions and compulsions in OCD treatment.
认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗强迫症(OCD)的有效方法。然而,对于在治疗过程中强迫观念和强迫行为是如何同步、顺序还是独立地发生变化,我们知之甚少。本研究使用潜在差异分数分析来展示 OCD 症状在 CBT 过程中的变化的路径分析动态模型。考察了强迫观念和强迫行为之间时间关系的四种竞争模型:无耦合(强迫观念和强迫行为没有动态关系)、目标导向(强迫观念导致随后强迫行为的变化)、习惯驱动(强迫行为导致随后强迫观念的变化)和相互作用。寻求治疗的 OCD 患者(N=84)参加了为期 12 周的 CBT 团体治疗,并在治疗前、第 4 次和第 8 次治疗时以及治疗结束时完成了评估强迫观念和强迫严重程度的测量。双变量结果支持目标导向的传统 CBT 模型,即强迫观念分数与随后强迫行为分数的变化存在时间关联。这些结果对 OCD 治疗中强迫观念和强迫行为的理论和治疗模型具有重要意义。