• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非阻塞性高危斑块但冠脉 CTA 未见钙化,以及 G 评分预测缺血。

Non obstructive high-risk plaque but not calcified by coronary CTA, and the G-score predict ischemia.

机构信息

Dept. Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.

Dept. Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov-Dec;13(6):305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2019.01.010
PMID:30661963
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association of plaque morphology with ischemia in non-obstructive lesions has not been fully eludicated: Calcium density and high-risk plaque features have not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

to assess whether high-risk plaque or calcified, and global mixed including non-calcified plaque burden (G-score) by coronary CTA predict ischemia in non-obstructive lesions using non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

In 106 patients with low-to-intermediate pre-test probability referred to coronary 128-slice dual source CTA, lesion-based and distal FFR were computated. The 4 high-risk-plaque criteria: Low-attenuation-plaque, Napkin Ring Sign, positive remodelling and spotty calcification were recorded. Plaque density (HU) and stenosis (MLA,MLD,%area,%diameter stenosis) were quantified. Plaque composition was classified as type 1-4:1 = calcified, 2 = mixed (calcified > non-calcified), 3 = mixed (non-calcified > calcified), 4 = non-calcified, and expressed by the G-score: Z = Sum of type 1-4 per segment. The total plaque segment involvement score (SIS) and the Coronary Calcium Score (Agatston) were calculated.

RESULTS

89 non-obstructive lesions were included. Both lesion-based and distal FFR were lower in high-risk-plaque as compared to calcified (0.85 vs 0.93, p < 0.001 and 0.79 vs 0.86, p = 0.002). The prevalence of lesion-based ischemia (FFR<0.8) was higher in high-risk-plaque as compared to calcified (25% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.007). Similarly, the rate of distal ischemia (40% vs 17.5%) was higher, respectively. Lower plaque density (HU) indicating higher lipid plaque component (p = 0.024) predicted lesion based FFR in low attenuation plaque. For all lesions (n = 89) including calcified (p = 0.003), the correlation enhanced. Positive remodelling and an increasing non-calcified plaque burden (G-score) in relation to calcified were associated with lower FFR distal (p = 0.042), but not the SIS and calcium score.

CONCLUSION

High-risk-plaque but not calcified, an increasing lipid-necrotic-core component and non-calcified mixed plaque burden (G-score) predict ischemia in non-obstructive lesions (INOCA), while an increasing calcium compactness acts contrary.

摘要

背景

非阻塞性病变中斑块形态与缺血之间的关系尚未完全阐明:尚未探讨钙密度和高危斑块特征。

目的

使用非侵入性的血流储备分数(FFR)评估冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CTA)中高风险斑块或钙化以及整体混合(包括非钙化斑块负担)(G 评分)是否可预测非阻塞性病变中的缺血。

方法

在低至中度的 106 名患者中,进行了冠状动脉 128 层双源 CTA 检查,基于病变和远端的 FFR 计算。记录了 4 种高危斑块标准:低衰减斑块,Napkin Ring Sign,正性重构和点状钙化。量化斑块密度(HU)和狭窄(MLA、MLD、%面积、%直径狭窄)。斑块成分分为 1-4 型:1=钙化,2=混合(钙化>非钙化),3=混合(非钙化>钙化),4=非钙化,并用 G 评分表示:Z=每个节段的 1-4 型总和。总斑块节段受累评分(SIS)和冠状动脉钙评分(Agatston)也进行了计算。

结果

共纳入 89 处非阻塞性病变。与钙化斑块相比,高危斑块的病变基础和远端 FFR 更低(0.85 比 0.93,p<0.001 和 0.79 比 0.86,p=0.002)。与钙化斑块相比,高危斑块的病变基础缺血(FFR<0.8)的发生率更高(25%比 2.5%,p=0.007)。同样,远端缺血的发生率也更高(40%比 17.5%)。较低的斑块密度(HU)表明脂质斑块成分较高(p=0.024),这与低衰减斑块的病变基础 FFR 相关。对于所有病变(n=89),包括钙化病变(p=0.003),相关性增强。正性重构和非钙化斑块负担(G 评分)相对于钙化的增加与远端 FFR 降低相关(p=0.042),但与 SIS 和钙评分无关。

结论

与钙化斑块相比,高危斑块(但不是钙化斑块)、脂质坏死核心成分的增加和非钙化混合斑块负担(G 评分)可预测非阻塞性病变中的缺血(INOCA),而钙密度的增加则相反。

相似文献

1
Non obstructive high-risk plaque but not calcified by coronary CTA, and the G-score predict ischemia.非阻塞性高危斑块但冠脉 CTA 未见钙化,以及 G 评分预测缺血。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov-Dec;13(6):305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
2
Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up.冠状动脉CT血管造影定量斑块评估在5年随访期间的增量预后价值。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Mar-Apr;10(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
3
Non-invasive fractional flow reserve in vessels without severe obstructive stenosis is associated with coronary plaque burden.无严重狭窄病变血管的无创性血流储备分数与冠状动脉斑块负荷相关。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Sep-Oct;12(5):379-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events.冠状动脉CT血管造影衍生的定量标志物对主要不良心脏事件预测的预后意义。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov-Dec;10(6):458-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Coronary computed tomographic angiography-derived anatomic and hemodynamic plaque characteristics in prediction of cardiovascular events.基于冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影的解剖学和血流动力学斑块特征预测心血管事件。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug;40(8):1641-1652. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03149-0. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
6
Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial.冠状动脉钙化对 CT 血管造影衍生 FFR 在冠状动脉疾病诊断性能的影响:NXT 试验的子研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;8(9):1045-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
Relative atherosclerotic plaque volume by CT coronary angiography trumps conventional stenosis assessment for identifying flow-limiting lesions.通过CT冠状动脉造影术得出的相对动脉粥样硬化斑块体积在识别血流限制性病变方面比传统狭窄评估更为重要。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;33(11):1847-1855. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1186-z. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.在实际临床实践中,基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的血流储备分数测量的可行性和诊断性能。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;33(2):271-281. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0995-9. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
9
Differences in the association of total versus local coronary artery calcium with acute coronary syndrome and culprit lesions in patients with acute chest pain: The coronary calcium paradox.在急性胸痛患者中,总冠状动脉钙与局部冠状动脉钙与急性冠状动脉综合征和罪犯病变的关联存在差异:冠状动脉钙悖论。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Jul;274:251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
Calcification remodeling index assessed by cardiac CT predicts severe coronary stenosis in lesions with moderate to severe calcification.心脏 CT 评估的钙化重塑指数可预测中重度钙化病变中严重冠状动脉狭窄。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jan-Feb;12(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Combination of coronary CT angiography, FFR , and risk factors in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients suspected CAD.联合冠状动脉 CT 血管造影、FFR 和危险因素预测疑似 CAD 患者的主要不良心血管事件。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 May;46(5):494-501. doi: 10.1002/clc.23989. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
The Roles of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Characterizing Coronary Plaque: Screening, Treatment, and Prevention.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影在冠状动脉斑块特征分析中的作用:筛查、治疗与预防
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jan 24;10(2):43. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020043.
3
The Effect of Vitamin D on Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Propensity Score Matched Case-Control Coronary CTA Study.
维生素D对冠状动脉粥样硬化的影响:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照冠状动脉CTA研究。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Jul 25;8(8):85. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8080085.
4
Gender Differences in the Atherosclerosis Profile by Coronary CTA in Coronary Artery Calcium Score Zero Patients.冠状动脉钙化积分零分患者中冠状动脉CTA显示的动脉粥样硬化特征的性别差异
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 15;10(6):1220. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061220.
5
Machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve assessment in acute chest pain: first experience.基于机器学习的急性胸痛患者CT血流储备分数评估:初步经验
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Aug;10(4):820-830. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-381.
6
Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Safely Defers Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的血流储备分数可安全推迟稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的有创冠状动脉造影检查。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 24;9(2):604. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020604.