• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔相效率的定量评估:咀嚼和吞咽固体测试(TOMASS)的验证。

Quantitative assessment of oral phase efficiency: validation of the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS).

机构信息

Laura Fergusson Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of Communication Disorders, The University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):444-450. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12450. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.12450
PMID:30663183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS) has been developed to provide clinicians with objective data regarding the efficiency of oral phase function and solid bolus ingestion.

AIMS

To determine if the TOMASS will detect changes in the oral phase of swallowing imposed by topical anaesthesia, thus providing validation of its clinical utility.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: Per the standard protocol, 10 healthy participants ate one-quarter of an Arnotts Salada biscuit. The number of bites per cracker, number of masticatory cycles, number of swallows and total time taken were recorded at baseline, following application of topical oral anaesthetic; this was additionally compared with a post-anaesthetic condition. Median and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to evaluate trial effect, and Friedman's tests were used to detect differences in the number of bites, number of swallows, number of chews and time taken to eat the crackers.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Results indicated that the number of both bites and swallows did not significantly change across conditions (χ²(2) = 0.105, p = 0.949, χ²(2) = 1.357, p = 0.507); however, the number of chews for the anaesthetic condition was significantly higher when compared with the baseline (p = 0.02) and post-anaesthesia conditions (p = 0.02). Further, the durations of ingestion in the anaesthetic condition were significantly longer than the baseline (p = 0.01) and post-anaesthesia (p = 0.01) conditions. Across all measures, there were no differences between baseline and post-anaesthesia conditions.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Although further exploration is required, these early data suggest the TOMASS is a sensitive measure in the evaluation of the oral-phase preparation of solid textures.

摘要

背景

咀嚼和吞咽固体测试(TOMASS)的开发是为了向临床医生提供有关口腔阶段功能和固体团块摄入效率的客观数据。

目的

确定 TOMASS 是否会检测到局部麻醉对吞咽口腔阶段的影响,从而验证其临床实用性。

方法和程序

按照标准方案,10 名健康参与者吃了四分之一块 Arnotts Salada 饼干。在基线时,记录每个饼干的咬数、咀嚼周期数、吞咽次数和总用时,在应用局部口腔麻醉后记录;这还与麻醉后条件进行了比较。计算中位数和四分位距(IQR)。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验评估试验效果,并使用 Friedman 检验检测咬数、吞咽数、咀嚼数和吃饼干时间的差异。

结果

结果表明,在不同条件下,咬数和吞咽数均无显著变化(χ²(2) = 0.105,p = 0.949,χ²(2) = 1.357,p = 0.507);然而,与基线(p = 0.02)和麻醉后(p = 0.02)条件相比,麻醉条件下的咀嚼次数显著增加。此外,麻醉条件下的摄入持续时间明显长于基线(p = 0.01)和麻醉后(p = 0.01)条件。在所有测量中,基线和麻醉后条件之间没有差异。

结论和意义

尽管需要进一步探索,但这些早期数据表明 TOMASS 是评估固体质地口腔准备阶段的敏感指标。

相似文献

1
Quantitative assessment of oral phase efficiency: validation of the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS).口腔相效率的定量评估:咀嚼和吞咽固体测试(TOMASS)的验证。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):444-450. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12450. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): reliability, validity and international normative data.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):信度、效度及国际常模数据
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):144-156. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12332. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Reliability and validity in patients with dysphagia.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):吞咽困难患者的信度和效度
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):558-566. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12613. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
International standardisation of the test of masticating and swallowing solids in children.儿童咀嚼和吞咽固体食物测试的国际标准化
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Feb;46(2):161-169. doi: 10.1111/joor.12728. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
5
The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids and the Timed Water Swallow Test: Reliability, associations, age and gender effects, and normative data.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试及限时饮水吞咽测试:可靠性、相关性、年龄和性别效应及常模数据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):67-81. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12768. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
The test of masticating and swallowing solids (ToMaSS): An investigation of applicability and clinical utility in children with orofacial myofunctional disorders.咀嚼吞咽固体测试(ToMaSS):在口面肌肉功能障碍儿童中应用和临床实用性的研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Oct;51(10):1966-1972. doi: 10.1111/joor.13776. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
7
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for two crackers available in the Scandinavian and international markets.咀嚼吞咽固体测试(TOMASS):两种在斯堪的纳维亚和国际市场上可获得的饼干的常模数据。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-337. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1800090. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Test of mastication and swallowing solids in healthy individuals aged 6 to 20 years: A normative study in an Indian context.6 至 20 岁健康个体的咀嚼和吞咽固体测试:印度背景下的一项规范研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Sep;51(9):1839-1847. doi: 10.1111/joor.13741. Epub 2024 May 20.
9
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for the adult Indian population.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):印度成年人群的规范数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Mar 18;35:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106958. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
Chewing skills in two and three year old children: Gender and age comparisons on an adapted version of the test of mastication and swallowing (TOMASS-C).2 岁和 3 岁儿童的咀嚼技能:咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS-C)适应版的性别和年龄比较。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Feb;26(1):38-44. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2152867. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Within-subject assessment of swallowing threshold and efficiency for maxillary implant assisted overdentures with and without palatal coverage.对上颌种植体支持覆盖与未覆盖腭部的覆盖义齿吞咽阈值和效率的受试者内评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 15;29(5):249. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06271-y.
2
Comparison of Oropharyngeal Efficiency Between Two Popular Brands of Marie Biscuits.两种流行品牌的玛丽饼干的口咽效率比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1687-1693. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03709-1. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
3
The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids and the Timed Water Swallow Test: Reliability, associations, age and gender effects, and normative data.
固体咀嚼和吞咽测试及限时饮水吞咽测试:可靠性、相关性、年龄和性别效应及常模数据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):67-81. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12768. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for the Adult Indian Population.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):印度成年人群的信度、效度和常模数据
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep;73(3):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02429-8. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for the adult Indian population.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):印度成年人群的规范数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Mar 18;35:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106958. eCollection 2021 Apr.