• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种流行品牌的玛丽饼干的口咽效率比较

Comparison of Oropharyngeal Efficiency Between Two Popular Brands of Marie Biscuits.

作者信息

Bhattarai Biraj, Vijayan Syam Krishna, Swapna N

机构信息

MSc. SLP, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, India.

Junior Research Fellow, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1687-1693. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03709-1. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-03709-1
PMID:37636620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10447802/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the study was to compare four measures of TOMASS (number of bites, number of masticatory cycles, number of swallowing and total time taken) across brands of Marie biscuits and gender.

METHODOLOGY

The study employed a cross-sectional design with nonrandomized convenience sampling. A total of 60 participants (30 females and 30 males) were recruited for the study in the age range of 18 to 26 years. Prior to enrolment in the study, the participants were screened for potential speech and swallowing issues. Two commercially available crackers (biscuits) in India, Sunfeast Marie Light and Britannia Marie Gold were used. Video recordings of the participants eating the biscuits were analyzed to document four measures of TOMASS.

RESULTS

The mean values obtained on all the measures for males were lesser than mean values for females for both the biscuits. Mann-Whitney U test revealed a statistically significant difference across number of swallows and total time taken across gender. There were no significant differences across biscuits on the four TOMASS measures.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the TOMASS measures were near similar for both brands of Marie biscuits. Thus, any of these two brands of Marie could be used for clinical swallow evaluation. However, gender needs to be kept in mind, while interpreting the results of TOMASS. Future studies need to be conducted with other brands of Marie biscuit and in other age groups.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较不同品牌玛丽饼干以及不同性别的四项TOMASS指标(咬的次数、咀嚼周期数、吞咽次数和总用时)。

方法

本研究采用非随机便利抽样的横断面设计。共招募了60名年龄在18至26岁之间的参与者(30名女性和30名男性)。在纳入研究之前,对参与者进行了潜在言语和吞咽问题的筛查。使用了印度市场上两种可买到的饼干(薄脆饼干),即阳光玛丽轻盐饼干和 Britannia 玛丽金牌饼干。对参与者吃饼干的视频记录进行分析,以记录TOMASS的四项指标。

结果

两种饼干的所有指标在男性中的均值均低于女性中的均值。曼-惠特尼U检验显示,吞咽次数和总用时在不同性别之间存在统计学上的显著差异。在四项TOMASS指标上,不同饼干之间没有显著差异。

结论

可以得出结论,两种品牌的玛丽饼干的TOMASS指标相近。因此,这两种品牌的玛丽饼干中的任何一种都可用于临床吞咽评估。然而,在解释TOMASS结果时需要考虑性别因素。未来需要对其他品牌的玛丽饼干以及其他年龄组进行研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Oropharyngeal Efficiency Between Two Popular Brands of Marie Biscuits.两种流行品牌的玛丽饼干的口咽效率比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1687-1693. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03709-1. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
2
The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids and the Timed Water Swallow Test: Reliability, associations, age and gender effects, and normative data.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试及限时饮水吞咽测试:可靠性、相关性、年龄和性别效应及常模数据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):67-81. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12768. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Test of mastication and swallowing solids in healthy individuals aged 6 to 20 years: A normative study in an Indian context.6 至 20 岁健康个体的咀嚼和吞咽固体测试:印度背景下的一项规范研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Sep;51(9):1839-1847. doi: 10.1111/joor.13741. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for two crackers available in the Scandinavian and international markets.咀嚼吞咽固体测试(TOMASS):两种在斯堪的纳维亚和国际市场上可获得的饼干的常模数据。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-337. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1800090. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for the Adult Indian Population.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):印度成年人群的信度、效度和常模数据
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep;73(3):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02429-8. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): reliability, validity and international normative data.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):信度、效度及国际常模数据
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):144-156. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12332. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for the adult Indian population.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):印度成年人群的规范数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Mar 18;35:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106958. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Reliability and validity in patients with dysphagia.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):吞咽困难患者的信度和效度
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):558-566. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12613. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
The test of masticating and swallowing solids (ToMaSS): An investigation of applicability and clinical utility in children with orofacial myofunctional disorders.咀嚼吞咽固体测试(ToMaSS):在口面肌肉功能障碍儿童中应用和临床实用性的研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Oct;51(10):1966-1972. doi: 10.1111/joor.13776. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
10
Quantitative assessment of oral phase efficiency: validation of the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS).口腔相效率的定量评估:咀嚼和吞咽固体测试(TOMASS)的验证。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):444-450. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12450. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Swallowing and Mastication Using the Swallowing Proficiency for Eating and Drinking Protocol Among Healthy Adults.使用饮食吞咽能力评估方案对健康成年人的吞咽和咀嚼功能进行评估。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):2590-2600. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04575-1. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for the adult Indian population.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):印度成年人群的规范数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Mar 18;35:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106958. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Reliability and validity in patients with dysphagia.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):吞咽困难患者的信度和效度
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):558-566. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12613. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for two crackers available in the Scandinavian and international markets.咀嚼吞咽固体测试(TOMASS):两种在斯堪的纳维亚和国际市场上可获得的饼干的常模数据。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-337. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1800090. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Aging and Sex Effects on Mastication Performance in Healthy, Nondysphagic, Community-Dwelling Adults.健康、无吞咽困难的社区成年人咀嚼性能的衰老和性别影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 May 8;29(2):705-713. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00097. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Two mastication tests used in children with down syndrome: A feasibility study.两种用于唐氏综合征儿童的咀嚼测试:一项可行性研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Apr;64(4):280-286. doi: 10.1111/jir.12693. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Quantitative assessment of oral phase efficiency: validation of the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS).口腔相效率的定量评估:咀嚼和吞咽固体测试(TOMASS)的验证。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):444-450. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12450. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
7
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): reliability, validity and international normative data.固体咀嚼和吞咽测试(TOMASS):信度、效度及国际常模数据
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):144-156. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12332. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Age-related changes in mastication.咀嚼功能的年龄相关性变化。
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Apr;44(4):299-312. doi: 10.1111/joor.12478. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
Skill training for swallowing rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者吞咽康复的技能训练
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jul;95(7):1374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Self-reports of eating quickly are related to a decreased number of chews until first swallow, total number of chews, and total duration of chewing in young people.年轻人自述进食速度快与首次吞咽前的咀嚼次数减少、总咀嚼次数和总咀嚼时间有关。
Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Jul;57(7):981-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 28.