UK NEQAS Haematology, Watford, UK.
University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2019 Apr;41(2):262-270. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12966. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
The accurate determination of Hb A is a key marker when screening for a β-thalassaemia carrier. Data from external quality assessment (EQA) exercises have shown a lack of alignment of Hb A quantitation both within and between methods. The only reference material available for Hb A quantitative assay at the time of writing is the World Health Organization International Reference Reagent (89/666; WHO IRR) prepared in the 1980s and not validated for all current methodologies.
The WHO IRR was analysed for Hb A concentration by 52 laboratories using a representative range of high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis analysers. The results of the analysis were compared to those of a whole blood EQA specimen of similar Hb A concentration, distributed in the same week.
The mean Hb A value obtained for the WHO IRR was 5.17%, compared to the assigned value of 5.3%. The range of results returned was wide (4.0%-6.2%), with differences in the results observed by between and within analyser groups. A similar range of results was seen with the whole blood sample, although the bias observed between analyser types was different from that seen with the WHO IRR.
The results may indicate a lack of commutability of the WHO IRR material, resulting from deterioration, matrix effects or changes in reagent formulation or calibration parameters. Further examination of the suitability of the WHO IRR (89/666) for continued use is required.
准确测定 HbA 是筛查β-地中海贫血携带者的关键标志物。外部质量评估 (EQA) 数据表明,HbA 定量方法在内部和方法之间缺乏一致性。在撰写本文时,唯一可用于 HbA 定量检测的参考物质是 20 世纪 80 年代制备的世界卫生组织国际参考试剂 (89/666; WHO IRR),但尚未针对所有当前方法进行验证。
52 个实验室使用代表性的高效液相色谱和毛细管电泳分析仪分析 WHO IRR 的 HbA 浓度。分析结果与同一周内分发的具有相似 HbA 浓度的全血 EQA 标本的结果进行了比较。
WHO IRR 的平均 HbA 值为 5.17%,而赋值为 5.3%。结果的范围很广(4.0%-6.2%),不同分析仪器组之间和组内的结果存在差异。全血样本也出现了类似的结果范围,尽管分析仪器类型之间观察到的偏差与 WHO IRR 不同。
结果可能表明 WHO IRR 材料缺乏互换性,这可能是由于其变质、基质效应或试剂配方或校准参数发生变化所致。需要进一步检查 WHO IRR(89/666)是否适合继续使用。