Holmes Emily A, Friedman Debra L, Connelly James A, Dulek Daniel E, Zhao Zhiguo, Esbenshade Adam J
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019 Aug;41(6):423-428. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001415.
Monitoring serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in pediatric oncology patients and treating subtherapeutic levels with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may prevent infections; however, evidence is limited. This retrospective study assessed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients diagnosed 2006 to 2011 to evaluate if monitoring/supplementing IgG would reduce febrile illnesses during maintenance chemotherapy. A subject was categorized as "ever IgG monitored" if they had ≥1 IgG levels checked and their risk days were stratified into not IgG monitored days and IgG monitored days. IgG monitored days were further stratified into IgG monitored with IVIG supplementation, monitored with no IVIG supplementation (IgG level >500 mg/dL) and monitored with no IVIG supplementation days (IgG level <500 mg/dL). Generalized linear mixed effects poisson models were used to compare events (febrile episode, positive blood culture, and febrile upper respiratory infection rates among these groups. In 136 patients, the febrile episode rate was higher in the ever IgG monitored cohort than the never monitored cohort (5.26 vs. 3.78 episodes/1000 d). Among monitored patients, IVIG monitoring and supplementation did not significantly impact the febrile episode, febrile upper respiratory infection, or the positive blood culture rates. These data suggest that monitoring/supplementing low IgG is not indicated for infection prophylaxis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients during maintenance chemotherapy.
监测儿科肿瘤患者的血清免疫球蛋白G(IgG)水平并用静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗低于治疗水平的IgG可能预防感染;然而,证据有限。这项回顾性研究评估了2006年至2011年诊断的儿科急性淋巴细胞白血病患者,以评估监测/补充IgG是否会减少维持化疗期间的发热性疾病。如果受试者有≥1次IgG水平检查,则将其分类为“曾监测IgG”,其风险天数分为未监测IgG天数和监测IgG天数。监测IgG天数进一步分为补充IVIG监测的IgG天数、未补充IVIG监测的IgG天数(IgG水平>500mg/dL)和未补充IVIG监测的天数(IgG水平<500mg/dL)。使用广义线性混合效应泊松模型比较这些组中的事件(发热发作、血培养阳性和发热性上呼吸道感染率)。在136例患者中,曾监测IgG队列的发热发作率高于未监测队列(5.26对3.78次发作/1000天)。在监测患者中,IVIG监测和补充对发热发作、发热性上呼吸道感染或血培养阳性率没有显著影响。这些数据表明,在急性淋巴细胞白血病患者维持化疗期间,监测/补充低IgG对预防感染并无必要。