Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Mental Health Service, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States of America; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Center for Clinical Management Research, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America; University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, Addiction Center, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, Addiction Center, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America; University of Michigan, Injury Prevention Center, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Mar;98:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Physical aggression (towards partners or non-partners) is common among patients in treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs), including among Veteran samples; however, few treatment programs provide adjunct intervention approaches targeting reduction or prevention of aggression. The primary objectives of this comparative efficacy study were to examine the impact of adjunct aggression interventions delivered during treatment on aggression and substance use outcomes, including: a) an acute treatment phase 6-session integrated Motivational Interviewing-Cognitive Behavioral Treatment intervention (MI-CBT) for aggression and substance use prevention, b) MI-CBT plus a 12-week telephone-based Continuing Care (MI-CBT + CC) intervention, and c) an acute phase single session control condition [including some discussion of violence prevention and local violence prevention resources (Enhanced Treatment as Usual (E-TAU))]. Participants (N = 180; 165 males and 15 females) were Veterans with SUD problems and past-year severe aggression who were randomized to one of three conditions: MI-CBT, MI-CBT + CC, or E-TAU. Primary 12-month outcomes included physical aggression and injury to partners, non-partners, and total aggression (collapsing across partner and non-partner relationships). Substance use outcomes included heavy drinking, marijuana use, cocaine use, and overall illicit substance use. Due to low representation in the sample (n = 4 women in each group at follow-up), women were excluded from primary analyses. According to unadjusted analyses of male participants, all groups showed similar significant declines in aggression over time, with the MI-CBT and MI-CBT + CC groups showing significant reductions in more substance use outcomes (heavy drinking, cocaine use, overall illicit drug use) than the E-TAU group. The only significant group x time interaction was for partner physical aggression by men (those in the MI-CBT + CC group showed a significantly greater decrease from baseline to follow-up). Also, neither the MI-CBT nor MI-CBT + CC groups reported any injuring of partners during the follow-up. For heavy drinking, cocaine, marijuana and overall illicit drug use, there were significant reductions over time, but no group by time interaction effects. The findings illustrate significant reductions in aggression and substance use over time for those involved in VA SUD treatment, and a potential modest benefit of additional integrated treatment approaches (MI-CBT, MI-CBT + CC) on reducing aggression. Future studies should examine dissemination efforts in the VA, cost-effectiveness, and moderators of outcome.
身体攻击(针对伴侣或非伴侣)在接受物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗的患者中很常见,包括退伍军人样本;然而,很少有治疗计划提供针对减少或预防攻击的附加干预方法。这项比较疗效研究的主要目的是检查治疗期间附加攻击干预对攻击和物质使用结果的影响,包括:a)急性治疗阶段 6 节综合动机访谈-认知行为治疗干预(MI-CBT)用于预防攻击和物质使用,b)MI-CBT 加 12 周基于电话的持续护理(MI-CBT+CC)干预,以及 c)急性阶段单一疗程对照条件[包括一些关于暴力预防和当地暴力预防资源的讨论(增强治疗常规(E-TAU))]。参与者(N=180;165 名男性和 15 名女性)是患有 SUD 问题和过去一年严重攻击行为的退伍军人,他们被随机分配到三种条件之一:MI-CBT、MI-CBT+CC 或 E-TAU。主要的 12 个月结果包括对伴侣、非伴侣和总攻击的身体攻击和伤害(跨越伴侣和非伴侣关系)。物质使用结果包括重度饮酒、大麻使用、可卡因使用和整体非法物质使用。由于样本中女性代表人数较少(每组只有 4 名女性在随访中),因此从主要分析中排除了女性。根据对男性参与者的未调整分析,所有组在时间上都显示出类似的攻击性显著下降,MI-CBT 和 MI-CBT+CC 组在更多物质使用结果(重度饮酒、可卡因使用、整体非法药物使用)方面显示出显著减少,而 E-TAU 组则显示出显著减少。唯一的显著组间时间交互作用是男性对伴侣的身体攻击(MI-CBT+CC 组从基线到随访的下降幅度明显更大)。此外,MI-CBT 或 MI-CBT+CC 组在随访期间均未报告对伴侣造成任何伤害。对于重度饮酒、可卡因、大麻和整体非法药物使用,随着时间的推移,这些药物的使用均有显著减少,但没有组间时间交互作用。这些发现表明,参与 VA SUD 治疗的患者的攻击性和物质使用随着时间的推移而显著减少,并且额外的综合治疗方法(MI-CBT、MI-CBT+CC)在减少攻击性方面可能具有适度的益处。未来的研究应检查 VA 中的传播工作、成本效益以及结果的调节因素。